COVID-19 Hospitalization Trends in Rural Versus Urban Areas in the United States.

Since the summer of 2020, the rate of coronavirus cases in the United States has been higher in rural areas than in urban areas, raising concerns that patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) will overwhelm under-resourced rural hospitals. Using data from the University of Minnesota COVID-19 Hospitalization Tracking Project and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, we document disparities in COVID-19 hospitalization rates between rural and urban areas. We show that rural-urban differences in COVID-19 admission rates were minimal in the summer of 2020 but began to diverge in fall 2020. Rural areas had statistically higher hospitalization rates from September 2020 through early 2021, after which rural-urban admission rates re-converged. The insights in this article are relevant to policymakers as they consider the adequacy of hospital resources across rural and urban areas during the COVID-19 pandemic.

US Trends in COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization and Mortality Rates Before and After Reopening Economies.

Importance: After abrupt closures of businesses and public gatherings in the US in late spring 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, by mid-May 2020, most states reopened their economies. Owing in part to a lack of earlier data, there was little evidence on whether state reopening policies influenced important pandemic outcomes-COVID-19-related hospitalizations and mortality-to guide future decision-making in the remainder of this and future pandemics. Objective: To investigate changes in COVID-19-related hospitalizations and mortality trends after reopening of US state economies. Design Setting and Participants: Using an interrupted time series approach, this cross-sectional study examined trends in per-capita COVID-19-related hospitalizations and deaths before and after state reopenings between April 16 and July 31, 2020. Daily state-level data from the University of Minnesota COVID-19 Hospitalization Tracking Project on COVID-19-related hospitalizations and deaths across 47 states were used in the analysis. Exposures: Dates that states reopened their economies. Main Outcomes and Measures: State-day observations of COVID-19-related hospitalizations and COVID-19-related new deaths per 100 000 people. Results: The study included 3686 state-day observations of hospitalizations and 3945 state-day observations of deaths. On the day of reopening, the mean number of hospitalizations per 100 000 people was 17.69 (95% CI, 12.54-22.84) and the mean number of daily new deaths per 100 000 people was 0.395 (95% CI, 0.255-0.536). Both outcomes displayed flat trends before reopening, but they started trending upward thereafter. Relative to the hospitalizations trend in the period before state reopenings, the postperiod trend was higher by 1.607 per 100 000 people (95% CI, 0.203-3.011; P = .03). This estimate implied that nationwide reopenings were associated with 5319 additional people hospitalized for COVID-19 each day. The trend in new deaths after reopening was also positive (0.0376 per 100 000 people; 95% CI, 0.0038-0.0715; P = .03), but the change in mortality trend was not significant (0.0443; 95% CI, -0.0048 to 0.0933; P = .08). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study conducted over a 3.5-month period across 47 US states, data on the association of hospitalizations and mortality with state reopening policies may provide input to state projections of the pandemic as policy makers continue to balance public health protections with sustaining economic activity.

The impact of a large-scale population-based asthma management program on pediatric asthma patients and their caregivers.

BACKGROUND: The consequences of pediatric asthma include missed school attendance, limitations in physical activity, and increased health care utilization and costs. Caregivers of asthmatic children are affected through missed work days and decreased job productivity. In response to these issues, a disease management program encompassing asthmatic children and their caregivers was developed as part of the core services offered to members of a large, national health care plan. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of the asthma management program on pediatric asthma patients and their caregivers over a 12-month period. METHODS: In this longitudinal study, 401 randomly selected member households with asthmatic children from 17 regional markets completed surveys before and after 12 months of participation in the asthma management program. Program interventions, which were tailored according to risk and need status, included various staggered educational mailings, reminder aids, videos, a peak expiratory flow rate meter, and telephonic case management. The Asthma Quality Assessment System survey, a battery of self-reported quality indicators, was used to solicit information from parents or caregivers of asthmatic children on issues pertaining to quality of life, asthma management skills and knowledge, and lost work/school days related to asthma. RESULTS: Statistically significant postprogram outcomes were observed in various domains, including a reduction in adverse utilization, symptomatology, and restricted activity days for children and lost work days for adult caretakers. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that a large-scale population-based intervention program can produce measurable clinical and economic benefits, thereby lessening the burden of asthma on the family unit.