Quality assurance of serial tomotherapy for head and neck patient treatments.

PURPOSE: A commercial serial tomotherapy intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning (Peacock, NOMOS Corp., Sewickley, PA) and delivery system is in clinical use. The dose distributions are highly conformal, with large dose gradients often surrounding critical structures, and require accurate localization and dose delivery. Accelerator and patient-specific quality assurance (QA) procedures have been developed that address the localization, normalization, and delivery of the IMRT dose distributions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The dose distribution delivered by serial tomotherapy is highly sensitive to the accuracy of the longitudinal couch motion. There is also an unknown sensitivity of the dose distribution on the dynamic mutlileaf collimator alignment. QA procedures were implemented that assess these geometric parameters. Evaluations of patient positioning accuracy and stability were conducted by exposing portal films before (single exposure) and after (single or double exposure) treatments. The films were acquired with sequential exposures using the largest available fixed multileaf portal (3.36 x 20 cm2). Comparison was made against digitally reconstructed radiographs generated using independent software and appropriate beam geometries. The delivered dose was verified using homogeneous cubic phantoms. Radiographic film was used to determine the localization accuracy of the delivered isodose distributions, and ionization chambers and thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD) chips were used to verify absolute dose at selected points. Ionization chamber measurements were confined to the target dose regions and TLD measurements were obtained throughout the irradiated volumes. Because many more TLD measurements were made, a statistical evaluation of the measured-to-calculated dose ratio was possible. RESULTS: The accelerator QA techniques provided adequate monitoring of the geometric patient movement and dynamic multileaf collimator alignment and positional stability. The absolute delivered dose as measured with the ionization chamber varied from 0.94 to 0.98. Based on these measurements, the delivered monitor units for both subsequent QA measurements and patient treatments were adjusted by the ratio of measured to calculated dose. TLD measurements showed agreement, on average, with the ionization chamber measurements. The distribution of TLD measurements in the high-dose regions indicated that measured doses agreed within 4.2% standard deviation of the calculated doses. In the low-dose regions, the measured doses were on average 5% greater than the calculated doses, due to a lack of leakage dose in the dose calculation algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: The QA system provided adequate determination of the geometric and dosimetric quantities involved in the use of IMRT for the head and neck. Ionization chamber and TLD measurements provided accurate determination of the absolute delivered dose throughout target volumes and critical structures, and radiographic film yielded precise dose distribution localization verification. Portal film acquisition and subsequent portal film analysis using 3.36 x 20 cm2 portals proved useful in the evaluation of patient immobilization quality. Adequate bony landmarks were imaged when carefully selected portals were used.

Phantoms for IMRT dose distribution measurement and treatment verification.

BACKGROUND: The verification of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) patient treatment dose distributions is currently based on custom-built or modified dose measurement phantoms. The only commercially available IMRT treatment planning and delivery system (Peacock, NOMOS Corp.) is supplied with a film phantom that allows accurate spatial localization of the dose distribution using radiographic film. However, measurements using other dosimeters are necessary for the thorough verification of IMRT. METHODS: We have developed a phantom to enable dose measurements using a cylindrical ionization chamber and the localization of prescription isodose curves using a matrix of thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD) chips. The external phantom cross-section is identical to that of the commercial phantom, to allow direct comparisons of measurements. A supplementary phantom has been fabricated to verify the IMRT dose distributions for pelvis treatments. RESULTS: To date, this phantom has been used for the verification of IMRT dose distributions for head and neck and prostate cancer treatments. Designs are also presented for a phantom insert to be used with polymerizing gels (e.g., BANG-2) to obtain volumetric dose distribution measurements. CONCLUSION: The phantoms have proven useful in the quantitative evaluation of IMRT treatments.

Quantitative dosimetric verification of an IMRT planning and delivery system.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The accuracy of dose calculation and delivery of a commercial serial tomotherapy treatment planning and delivery system (Peacock. NOMOS Corporation) was experimentally determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: External beam fluence distributions were optimized and delivered to test treatment plan target volumes, including three with cylindrical targets with diameters ranging from 2.0 to 6.2 cm and lengths of 0.9 through 4.8 cm, one using three cylindrical targets and two using C-shaped targets surrounding a critical structure, each with different dose distribution optimization criteria. Computer overlays of film-measured and calculated planar dose distributions were used to assess the dose calculation and delivery spatial accuracy. A 0.125 cm3 ionization chamber was used to conduct absolute point dosimetry verification. Thermoluminescent dosimetry chips, a small-volume ionization chamber and radiochromic film were used as independent checks of the ion chamber measurements. RESULTS: Spatial localization accuracy was found to be better than +/-2.0 mm in the transverse axes (with one exception of 3.0 mm) and +/-1.5 mm in the longitudinal axis. Dosimetric verification using single slice delivery versions of the plans showed that the relative dose distribution was accurate to +/-2% within and outside the target volumes (in high dose and low dose gradient regions) with a mean and standard deviation for all points of -0.05% and 1.1%, respectively. The absolute dose per monitor unit was found to vary by +/-3.5% of the mean value due to the lack of consideration for leakage radiation and the limited scattered radiation integration in the dose calculation algorithm. To deliver the prescribed dose, adjustment of the monitor units by the measured ratio would be required. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment planning and delivery system offered suitably accurate spatial registration and dose delivery of serial tomotherapy generated dose distributions. The quantitative dose comparisons were made as far as possible from abutment regions and examination of the dosimetry of these regions will also be important. Because of the variability in the dose per monitor unit and the complex nature of the calculation and delivery of serial tomotherapy, patient-specific quality assurance procedures will include a measurement of the delivered target dose.

Systematic verification of a three-dimensional electron beam dose calculation algorithm.

A three-dimensional electron beam dose calculation algorithm implemented on a commercial radiotherapy treatment planning system is described. The calculation is based on the M. D. Anderson Hospital (M.D.A.H.) pencil beam model, which uses the Fermi-Eyges theory of thick-target multiple Coulomb scattering. To establish the calculation algorithm's accuracy as well as its limitations, it was systematically and extensively tested and evaluated against a set of benchmark measurements. Various levels of dose and spatial tolerances were used to validate the calculation quantitatively. Results are presented in terms of the percentage of data points meeting a specific tolerance level. The algorithm's ability to accurately simulate commonly used clinical setup geometries, including standard or extended SSDs, blocked fields, irregular surfaces, and heterogeneities, is demonstrated. Regions of disagreement between calculations and measurements are also shown. The clinical implication of such disagreements is addressed, and the algorithmic assumptions involved are discussed.

Prospective clinical evaluation of an electronic portal imaging device.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the clinical implementation of an electronic portal imaging device can improve the precision of daily external beam radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 1991, an electronic portal imaging device was installed on a dual energy linear accelerator in our clinic. After training the radiotherapy technologists in the acquisition and evaluation of portal images, we performed a randomized study to determine whether online observation, interruption, and intervention would result in more precise daily setup. The patients were randomized to one of two groups: those whose treatments were actively monitored by the radiotherapy technologists and those that were imaged but not monitored. The treating technologists were instructed to correct the following treatment errors: (a) field placement error (FPE) > 1 cm; (b) incorrect block; (c) incorrect collimator setting; (d) absent customized block. Time of treatment delivery was recorded by our patient tracking and billing computers and compared to a matched set of patients not participating in the study. After the patients radiation therapy course was completed, an offline analysis of the patient setup error was planned. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were treated to 34 anatomical sites in this study. In 893 treatment sessions, 1,873 fields were treated (1,089 fields monitored and 794 fields unmonitored). Ninety percent of the treated fields had at least one image stored for offline analysis. Eighty-seven percent of these images were analyzed offline. Of the 1,011 fields imaged in the monitored arm, only 14 (1.4%) had an intervention recorded by the technologist. Despite infrequent online intervention, offline analysis demonstrated that the incidence of FPE > 10 mm in the monitored and unmonitored groups was 56 out of 881 (6.1%) and 95 out of 595 (11.2%), respectively; p < 0.01. A significant reduction in the incidence of FPE > 10 mm was confined to the pelvic fields. The time to treat patients in this study was 10.78 min (monitored) and 10.10 min (unmonitored). Features that were identified that prevented the technologists from recognizing more errors online include poor image quality inherent to the portal imaging device used in this study, artifacts on the portal images related to table supports, and small field size lacking sufficient anatomical detail to detect FPEs. Furthermore, tools to objectively evaluate a portal image for the presence of field placement error were lacking. These include magnification factor corrections between the simulation of portal image, online measurement tools, image enhancement tools, and image registration algorithms. CONCLUSION: The use of an electronic portal imaging device in our clinic has been implemented without a significant increase in patient treatment time. Online intervention and correction of patient positioning occurred rarely, despite FPEs of > 10 mm being present in more than 10% of the treated fields. A significant reduction in FPEs exceeding 10 mm was made in the group of patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy. It is likely that this improvement was made secondarily to a decrease in systematic error and not because of online interventions. More significant improvements in portal image quality and the availability of online image registration tools are required before substantial improvements can be made in patient positioning with online portal imaging.

Patterns of care survey results: treatment planning for carcinoma of the prostate.

PURPOSE: Treatment planning has been defined differently at various institutions to encompass tasks ranging from the initial evaluation of the patient to the delivery of the treatment as well as a more narrow view, focused primarily on isodose computation. To evaluate the impact of much of the new treatment-planning technology that has become available, it is necessary to define and develop recommended guidelines for the treatment-planning process. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The 1989 Patterns of Care Study (PCS) included questionnaires to access treatment planning practices currently in use for the entire census of oncology facilities in the United States. These questionnaires were developed by a consensus committee consisting of both physicists and radiation oncologists whose charge was to formulate a description of current treatment-planning practices. The description was based on the committee's experience and knowledge of the treatment-planning process considered to be widely available and in general use, as well as a review of the literature. From the description of the treatment-planning process, a set of guidelines for treatment planning was developed for prostate as well as each of the other disease sites included in the PCS. Data from the study defined the general structure, methodology, process, and tools used by each institution involved in the Patterns of Care Survey Study. National averages for all of the variables were calculated with weighted averages, with the weights reflecting the sample design and number of patients in the different types of facilities. The data were stratified according to academic, hospital, or free-standing facility and were compared with the Consensus Guidelines for Treatment Planning of the Prostate. DISCUSSION: Based on the consensus statement, the treatment-planning process was separated into the following categories: (a) Treatment-Planning Workup, (b) Treatment Plan Implementation, (c) Treatment Delivery, (d) Treatment Verification, and (e) Quality Assurance. The results from the survey were summarized for each category and compared with the consensus statement. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is an increasing trend toward using computed tomography (CT) information to acquire individualized patient data, volume definition and localization are often completed in the simulator without the direct use of CT information (47%). As more sophisticated beam arrangements and blocking are used, one needs to look at the full three-dimensional (3D) volume to ensure that there are no marginal misses due to blocking and beam arrangement. Improved and more widespread use of immobilization devices is also required with conformal treatments and reduced margins. The results of the survey helped to identify and establish the standard of practice for treatment planning of the prostate as well as to provide documentation for better defining a complete description of the treatment planning process. Well-documented guidelines will provide more consistent treatment of patients, which should have an impact on outcome.

Treatment planning structure and process in the United States: a "Patterns of Care" study.

PURPOSE: To conduct a study of the structure and process of treatment planning in the United States. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A Patterns of Care treatment planning consensus committee developed a survey form that was used to gather data for 106 items relating to the structure and process of treatment planning. These questions were general in nature and not specific to any particular disease site. Seventy-three facilities were randomly selected for site visits from the 1321 radiation therapy facilities in the United States: 21 academic, 26 hospital, and 26 free-standing. During the site visit the facility physicist, assisted by the site-visit physicist, completed the form. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of facilities have cobalt-60 machines; 25% have 4 MV linacs; 75% have photon energies in the range of 5-8 MV; and less than 10% have energies greater than 20 MV. Academic facilities led hospital and free-standing facilities by about 30 percentage points in the availability of all electron energies (88 vs. 58%, approximately, in the range 4-13 MeV and scaling downward to about 60 vs. 30% at the highest energies). The national averages for the availability of Cs-137, Ir-192, and I-125 were 87, 73, and 44%, respectively. Computerized tomography (CT) scanning is not available or not used in 15% of hospital and free-standing facilities. Ninety-six percent of facilities have treatment planning computers; at 10% of facilities physicians do not participate in treatment planning. The estimated national averages of facilities having formal quality assurance (QA) programs for treatment planning systems, simulators, film processors, and blocking systems are 44, 79, 62, and 55%, respectively. Sixty-three percent of facilities obtain independent machine calibrations. CONCLUSION: This is the first patterns of treatment planning study carried out in the United States and the results reported here will establish a baseline for future studies. The present study has identified some elements that were unexpected, such as the percentage of facilities lacking formal QA programs for treatment planning systems; however, it has not established any impact of such findings. It is recommended that future studies include the availability of new technologies such as multileaf collimation, dynamic wedges, digital portal imaging, and CT simulation. With the increasing nationwide concern with the cost of health care, we must continue to monitor the implementation, use, and impact on treatment outcome of new and expensive technologies.

The Electronic View Box: a software tool for radiation therapy treatment verification.

PURPOSE: We have developed a software tool for interactively verifying treatment plan implementation. The Electronic View Box (EVB) tool copies the paradigm of current practice but does so electronically. A portal image (online portal image or digitized port film) is displayed side by side with a prescription image (digitized simulator film or digitally reconstructed radiograph). The user can measure distances between features in prescription and portal images and "write" on the display, either to approve the image or to indicate required corrective actions. The EVB tool also provides several features not available in conventional verification practice using a light box. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The EVB tool has been written in ANSI C using the X window system. The tool makes use of the Virtual Machine Platform and Foundation Library specifications of the NCI-sponsored Radiation Therapy Planning Tools Collaborative Working Group for portability into an arbitrary treatment planning system that conforms to these specifications. The present EVB tool is based on an earlier Verification Image Review tool, but with a substantial redesign of the user interface. A graphical user interface prototyping system was used in iteratively refining the tool layout to allow rapid modifications of the interface in response to user comments. RESULTS: Features of the EVB tool include 1) hierarchical selection of digital portal images based on physician name, patient name, and field identifier; 2) side-by-side presentation of prescription and portal images at equal magnification and orientation, and with independent grayscale controls; 3) "trace" facility for outlining anatomical structures; 4) "ruler" facility for measuring distances; 5) zoomed display of corresponding regions in both images; 6) image contrast enhancement; and 7) communication of portal image evaluation results (approval, block modification, repeat image acquisition, etc.). CONCLUSION: The EVB tool facilitates the rapid comparison of prescription and portal images and permits electronic communication of corrections in port shape and positioning.

An evaluation of two methods of anatomical alignment of radiotherapy portal images.

PURPOSE: Two techniques have been developed at our institution to allow anatomical registration of digitized portal images to a simulation film. Accuracy of the portal image alignment methods is tested and single intrauser and multiple interuser variation is examined using each technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Method one requires the identification of anatomical fiducial points on a simulation image and its corresponding portal image. The parameters required to align the corresponding points are calculated by a least squares fit algorithm. Method two uses an anatomical template generated from the simulation image and superimposing it upon a portal image. The template is then adjusted by a computer mouse to obtain the best subjective anatomical fit on the portal image. Megavoltage portal images of a skull phantom with various known shifts and eight clinical image files were aligned by each method. Each data set was aligned several times by both a single user and multiple users. RESULTS: Alignment of the anatomical phantom portal images demonstrates an accuracy of less than 0.8 +/- 0.9 mm and 0.7 +/- 1.0 degrees with either method. As out of plane rotation increased from 0 to 5 degrees, simulating out of plane malpositioning, alignment orthogonal to the plane of rotation worsened to 1.5 +/- 1.1 mm with the point method and 2.4 +/- 1.6 mm with the template method. Alignment parallel to the axis of the gantry rotation was insensitive to this change and remained constant as did the rotational alignment parameters. For the clinical image files the magnitude of variation for a single user is typically less than +/- 1 mm or +/- 1 degree. The magnitude of variation of alignment increased when multiple users aligned the same image files. The variation was dependent upon anatomical site and to a lesser degree the method of alignment used. The root mean square deviation of translational shifts range from +/- 0.68 mm when using the template method in the pelvis to as high as +/- 2.94 mm with the template method to align abdominal portal images. In the thorax and pelvis translational alignments along the horizontal axis were more precise than along the vertical axis. Multiple user variability was in part due to poor image quality, user experience, non rigidity of the anatomical features, and the difficulty in locating an exact point on a continuous anatomical structure. CONCLUSION: In well controlled phantom studies both the fiducial point and template method provide similar and adequate results. The phantom studies show that alignment error and variance increase with distortion in anatomical features secondary to out of plane rotations. In clinical situations intrauser variation is small, however, multiple interuser variation is larger. The magnitude of variation is dependent upon the anatomical site aligned.

Independent collimator dosimetry for a dual photon energy linear accelerator.

PURPOSE: The independent collimator feature in medical linear accelerators can define radiation fields that are asymmetric with respect to the flattening filter and oblique to the incident surface. Prior to clinical implementation, it is necessary to evaluate the dosimetry of this non-standard treatment delivery technique. An investigation of the independent collimator dosimetry for 6 MV and 18 MV x-ray beams has been undertaken. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dose to tissue in free space, percent depth dose and dose distribution were measured and compared to that for symmetric field collimation. RESULTS: The dosimetry results were consistent for both photon modes. Dose in free space with asymmetric collimation can be calculated from the corresponding symmetric field dose in free space to within 1.2 +/- 0.7% by applying an appropriate off-axis factor. Asymmetric field percent depth dose differs from symmetric field percent depth dose on average by 1.1 +/- 0.7% for 6 MV and by 0.7 +/- 0.5% for 18 MV for field sizes ranging from 5 x 5 to 20 x 20, centered 3 cm and 10 cm off-axis. The measured isodose curves demonstrate divergence effects and reduced doses (less than 3%) adjacent to the field edge closest to the flattening filter center. This dose asymmetry result is identical to that from secondary collimation. CONCLUSION: The methodology for clinical implementation of the independent collimator feature is straightforward. However, accurate representation of the isodose distributions by commercial radiotherapy treatment planning systems requires special dose calculation algorithms.

The use of on-line image verification to estimate the variation in radiation therapy dose delivery.

PURPOSE: On-line radiotherapy imaging systems provide data that allow us to study the geometric nature of treatment variation. It is more clinically relevant to examine the resultant dosimetric variation. In this work, daily beam position as recorded by the on-line images is used to recalculate the treatment plan to show the effect geometric variation has on dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Daily 6 MV or 18 MV x-ray portal images were acquired using a fiberoptic on-line imaging system for 12 patients with cancers in the head and neck, thoracic, and pelvic regions. Each daily on-line portal image was aligned with the prescription simulation image using a template of anatomical structures defined on the latter. The outline of the actual block position was then superimposed on the prescription image. Daily block positions were cumulated to give a summary image represented by the block overlap isofrequency distribution. The summary data were used to analyze the amount of genometric variation relative to the prescription boundary on a histogram distribution plot. Treatment plans were recalculated by considering each aligned portal image as an individual beam. RESULTS: On-Line Image Verification (OLIV) data can differentiate between systematic and random errors in a course of daily radiation therapy. The data emphasize that the type and magnitude of patient set-up errors are unique for individual patients and different clinical situations. Head and neck sites had the least random variation (average 0-100% block overlap isofrequency distribution width = 7 mm) compared to thoracic (average 0-100% block overlap isofrequency distribution width = 12 mm) or pelvic sites (average 0-100% block overlap isofrequency distribution width = 14 mm). When treatment delivery is analyzed case by case, systematic as well as random errors are represented. When the data are pooled by anatomical site, individuality of variations is lost and variation appears random. Recalculated plans demonstrated dosimetric deviations from the original plans. The differences between the two dosimetric distributions were emphasized using a technique of plan subtraction. This allowed quick identification of relative "hot and cold spots" in the recalculated plans. The magnitude and clinical significance of dosimetric variation was unique for each patient. CONCLUSIONS: OLIV data are used to study geometric uncertainties because of the unique nature for individual patients. Dose recalculation is helpful to illustrate the dosimetric consequences of set-up errors.

On-line image verification in radiation therapy: an early USA experience.

The intense effort in the past 5 to 10 years to develop on-line image verification (OLIV) systems is made partly in anticipation of the increased verification demands of complex 3-dimensional (3D) conformal radiation therapy, and partly to improve on the current practice of weekly treatment verification. These systems allow convenient acquisition of daily portal images or many images during one treatment session. Systems based on fluoroscopic and scanning approaches can now be purchased from various vendors and are being evaluated at several radiation therapy centers. The performances of these systems vary, but all appear to be adequate for clinical use. At the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, we have been conducting clinical on-line imaging for the past 3 years using a fiber-optic fluoroscopic system. Daily operation of the system requires coordinated participation of the physics and radiation therapy technology staff. The major consideration is in the management and evaluation of the large amount of verification images about each individual patient. At present, it is not clear whether the technology would be cost-effective in the clinical setting. However, it is clear that OLIV provides a powerful tool in enhancing our knowledge of treatment variation. The information will be invaluable in the development of improved treatment techniques. It is also likely that these systems will play a important part in the verification of 3D conformal radiation therapy.

Verification data for electron beam dose algorithms.

The Collaborative Working Group (CWG) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) electron beam treatment planning contract has performed a set of 14 experiments that measured dose distributions for 28 unique beam-phantom configurations that simulated various patient anatomic structures and beam geometries. Multiple dose distributions were measured with film or diode detectors for each configuration, resulting in 78, 2-D planar dose distributions and one, 1-D depth-dose distribution. Measurements were made for 9- and 20-MeV electron beams, using primarily 6 x 6- and 15 x 15-cm applicators at several SSDs. Dose distributions were measured for shaped fields, irregular surfaces, and inhomogeneities (1-D, 2-D, and 3-D), which were designed to simulate many clinical electron treatments. The data were corrected for asymmetries, and normalized in an absolute manner. This set of measured data can be used for verification of electron beam dose algorithms and is available to others for that purpose.

Study of treatment variation in the radiotherapy of head and neck tumors using a fiber-optic on-line radiotherapy imaging system.

On-line radiotherapy imaging systems allow convenient daily acquisition of portal images for treatment verification. The information can also be used to study treatment variability. Using a prototype fiber-optic imaging system, we have measured the treatment variation of 17 head and neck patients. Daily digital portal images were acquired for the on-cord left and right lateral fields. Treatment variations were quantified using the Cumulative Verification Image Analysis (CVIA) method developed at our institute. In the CVIA method, daily portal images were aligned according to three anatomical points predefined on a digitized simulation, or prescription, image. After each image alignment, the block position was cumulated in a bit-map and superimposed on the prescription image to give a cumulative verification summary image. Iso-frequency distributions, or contours, of the block overlap were calculated and examined with respect to the prescription treatment area. The range of the treatment variation was large for the 17 patients. On average, separation of the 0% to 100% block overlap contours was about 10 mm, and the 20% to 80%, 5 mm. The block overlap contours were also used to calculate the frequency with which the prescription area as defined on the simulation film had been treated. The fraction of the prescription area treated depended on the accuracy of the treatment setup and patient repositioning, as expected. At best, approximately 95% of the prescribed area was irradiated 100% of the time during the entire course of radiotherapy. At worst, approximately 70% of the prescribed area was irradiated 100% of the time. These results demonstrate that despite immobilization, large setup variation can still occur. Presenting treatment variation data as population averages does not reflect on the large variation that may be observed in the individual patient.

Dosimetry considerations for a Lipowitz metal tissue compensator system.

The present report describes the fabrication technique and the dosimetry aspects of a new compensator system that uses the low melting point allow Lipowitz metal. Compensating ratios (CR, mm of tissue compensated per mm of cerrobend) were determined for various field sizes and depths for 60Co, and X ray energies of 4, 6, 18, and 25 MV. Typical CR for 10 cm X 10 cm field and 10 cm depth were: 60Co, 4 MV, and 6 MV, 1:15; 18 and 25 MV, 1:20. Verification of these CR were performed at 6 MV using polystyrene phantoms. Ionization measurements were made for various field sizes and depths and normalized to central axis full-phantom readings for both compensated and non-compensated fields. Without compensation, percent differences ranged as high as 40% for a tissue deficit of 10 cm. With the compensating filters (CF) in place, this difference was reduced to 2-4%. Overall, the CF system was capable of producing dose uniformity to within +/- 10% for a wide range of depths and field sizes.

Use of impedance plethysmography to continually monitor bone marrow blood flow.

Methods for measuring bone-blood flow are often time-consuming, tedious, single-point measurements which require sacrifice of the animal. An impedance plethysmographic technique is described which can be used to quantify temporal bone marrow blood flow changes. Results obtained with the impedance technique compare favorably with the data from simultaneously administered microspheres. Injection of sympathomimetic drugs produced measurable responses: isoproterenol caused a significant increase in bone marrow blood flow within 1 min and levarterenol decreased bone marrow blood flow. Data obtained with impedance plethysmography suggest that the technique is feasible for multiple measurements on the same animal and that the technique can be used to study acute or chronic changes in bone marrow blood flow following various experimental treatments.

Quality assurance in radiation therapy: clinical and physical aspects. Manpower requirements in training and certification of technologists and dosimetrists.

The rapid expansion of radiation oncology has created a shortage in the number of personnel adequately trained in radiation therapy technology. An estimate of present needs for graduate radiation therapy technologists is on the order of 2000 to 2500 additional individuals. This shortage of technologists and the highly technical nature of radiation oncology not only makes apparent the need for increased activity in training individuals in radiation therapy but also points out the need for continuing education of individuals currently employed in the field. A team of highly trained individuals is required to obtain the optimal results with radiation therapy treatment. The minimum number of health care professionals for any center administering radiation therapy should include a radiation oncologist, a radiation therapy technologist, a nurse and a radiation therapy physicist or dosimetrist under the supervision of a consulting radiation therapy physicist. There is no consensus as to the number of individuals required in each position as the patient load is increased. A discussion of manpower needs in radiation therapy technology and dosimetry, and the role of radiation therapy technologists and dosimetrists in quality assurance will be discussed. The discussion will also include recommendations for minimum or basic staffing requirements for any center administering radiation therapy, regional or community hospitals and optimal standards now in effect at an advanced facility.

Lung dose in electron beam therapy of chest wall.

The dose to lung tissue in patients whose chest walls are irradiated with 6 and 9 MeV electron beams was estimated. Thermoluminescent dosimetry measurements in thoracic Section 18 of Rando phantom were compared with calculations by two different methods, the effective depth method and the average absorption equivalent thickness (AET) method. The calculations were based on a density of 0.45 (relative to water) for lung tissue in the Rando phantom which was determined from CT scan. The measurements agreed with calculations by the effective depth method within 7 per cent for 9 MeV electron beam at locations where lung tissue thickness was less than 4.5 cm. Larger discrepancy between measurement and calculations was found at greater depths. The effective depth method gave better agreement with measurements (within 14 per cent) compared with the average AET method. The effective depth method was used, to calculate the lung tissue dose at different depths beneath the chest wall. A lung density of 0.25 was assumed to conform to real irradiation situation. The calculations show that for a 9 MeV electron beam dose to lung at 5 cm depth beyond a 2 cm thick chest wall could be as high as 72 per cent of the dose at the maximum buildup depth. It is recommended that post-mastectomy patients with chest wall thickness less than 2 cm should be irradiated with an electron energy of less than 9 MeV or that the chest wall thickness be artificially increased with tissue equivalent bolus.

The use of thermal plastics for immobilization of patients during radiotherapy.

A new orthopedic casting material has been adapted to use for immobilizing patients undergoing radiation therapy. The material has proven to be less cumbersome and time-consuming than other products currently in use. The necessary equipment and procedures required to form a immobilization cast using thermal plastic material are described.

Cardiovascular responses of men and women to lower body negative pressure.

Changes in blood flow and blood redistribution were measured by impedance plethysmography in the pelvic and leg regions of six male and four female subjects during three 5-min exposures to -20, -40, and -60 mm Hg lower body negative pressure (LBNP). Female subjects demonstrated significantly higher mean heart rate and lower leg blood flow indices than the male subjects during the recumbent control periods. Men had slightly higher mean resting systolic and diastolic blood pressures and higher mean control pelvic blood flow indices. Women demonstrated significantly less blood pooling in the legs and slightly less in the pelvic region than the men. All of the 18 tests with male subjects at -60 mm Hg were completed without initial signs of syncope, while only two of the tests with women were completed successfully without the subject exhibiting presyncopal conditions. The results of this study indicate that impedance plethysmography can be used to measure segmental cardiovascular responses during LBNP and that females may be less tolerant to -60 mm Hg LBNP than males.