SARS-CoV-2: recommendations for treatment in intensive care medicine.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) progresses mildly in most of the cases; however, about 5% of the patients develop a severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Of all COVID-19 patients 3% need intensive care treatment, which becomes a great challenge for anesthesiology and intensive care medicine, medically, hygienically and for technical safety requirements. For these reasons, only experienced medical and nursing staff in the smallest grouping possible should be assigned. For these team members, a consistent use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is essential.Due to the immense medical challenges, the following treatment guidelines were developed by the ÖGARI (Österreichische Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie, Reanimation und Intensivmedizin), FASIM (Federation of Austrian Societies of Intensive Care Medicine) and ÖGIAIN (Österreichische Gesellschaft für Internistische und Allgemeine Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin).The recommendations given in this article are to be understood as short snapshots of the moment; all basic guidelines are works in progress and will be regularly updated as evidence levels, new study results and additional experience are gathered.

Continuous intra-articular local anesthetic drug instillation versus discontinuous sciatic nerve block after total knee arthroplasty.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Sciatic nerve block (SNB) is commonly used as adjunct to femoralis nerve block (FNB) to achieve high-quality pain relief after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, this combination is associated with considerable muscle weakness, foot drop and surgically related nerve injuries may be masked. The purpose of this study was to assess whether low risk continuous intra-articular anesthetic drug instillation is an adequate alternative to SNB when adding to FNB after TKA. DESIGN: Retrospective investigational follow-up study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. Interdisciplinary postoperative anesthetic and orthopedic survey. PATIENTS: For this investigational analysis, 34 of 50 consecutive patients were available. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent primary unilateral TKA. Group A (18 patients) received a continuous intra-articular 0.33% ropivacaine (5 mL/h) instillation for the first 48 h postoperatively. In Group B (16 patients) a discontinuous SNB was used. Both groups were treated with a continuous FNB. MEASUREMENTS: Main endpoints were mean and maximum postoperative pain intensity levels for both anterior and posterior knee side, amount of postoperative administered opioid drugs, differences in functional outcome or hospital stay and rate of postoperative complications. MAIN RESULTS: Group A showed higher pain intensity levels for the posterior knee side (P≤.042). Merely on the second postoperative day there were no differences within either study group. No differences were found regarding anterior knee pain. Group A showed a significant higher postoperative piritramid consumption (P≤.007). Length of hospital stay or postoperative functional outcome was not significant different. Postoperative complications were not related to anesthesia techniques. CONCLUSIONS: SNB technique resulted in superior pain relief in comparison to continuous intra-articular local anesthetic drug instillation as adjunct to continuous FNB after TKA.

Cholesterol rather than procalcitonin or C-reactive protein predicts mortality in patients with infection.

Serum cholesterol procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured consecutively in 76 critically ill patients at admission to the intensive care unit. The presence of infection was defined according to the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) criteria; in-house mortality, underlying diseases, and severity of sepsis were monitored. Nonsurvivors had significantly lower cholesterol levels compared with survivors (69 mg/dL [range, 37-88 mg/dL] vs. 96 mg/dL [range, 71-132 mg/dL], P = 0.006) whereas no significant differences were noted for serum PCT and CRP levels. In a cohort of patients with cholesterol levels of 50 mg/dL or less, 82% did not survive as compared with patients with cholesterol levels of 100 mg/dL or greater (mortality, 21%). In a control group without infection, no difference of cholesterol, PCT, or CRP was found between survivors and nonsurvivors. Our data show that low cholesterol levels in patients with infectious disease have a prognostic value and may be useful markers to identify high-risk patients already at admission.

Impact of infusion speed on the safety and effectiveness of prothrombin complex concentrate: a prospective clinical trial of emergency anticoagulation reversal.

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) infusion is preferred for emergency reversal of coumarin therapy. Rapid infusion can potentially save crucial time; however, the possible impact of high infusion speed on PCC safety and effectiveness has not been delineated. In a prospective multinational clinical trial with 43 patients receiving PCC (Beriplex P/N) for emergency reversal of coumarin therapy, infusion speeds were selected by the investigators. In a two-phase statistical analysis, the influence of baseline patient variables and dose on selected infusion speed was assessed. Then, the effect of infusion speed on reduction in international normalized ratio (INR) and on thrombogenicity marker pharmacokinetics was evaluated. Infusion speed ranged widely from 2.0 to 40.0 mL min(-1) with a median of 7.5 mL min(-1). Selection of infusion speed was not significantly influenced by gender, age, body mass index, presence of acute bleeding, indication for coumarin therapy, baseline INR, or PCC dose. Infusion speed was higher by a median of 2.2 mL min(-1) (95% confidence interval, 1.0-4.3 mL min(-1)) among patients receiving Beriplex P/N volumes > or =80 mL compared with smaller infusion volumes. Infusion speed did not affect INR attained 30 min following PCC infusion. None of the evaluated thrombogenicity marker pharmacokinetic parameters was affected by infusion speed. Infusions in one patient with questionable hemostatic efficacy and another with a possibly PCC-related thromboembolic event were at moderate and slow speeds, respectively. This study provides the first direct evidence that Beriplex P/N can be rapidly infused for emergency coumarin therapy reversal without altering safety or effectiveness.

Patient satisfaction with anesthesia care: information alone does not lead to improvement.

PURPOSE: To evaluate if information campaigns and introduction of information leaflets lead to an improvement in patient satisfaction with anesthesia care. METHODS: In 2000, we carried out an assessment of patient satisfaction with anesthesia care. "Information/involvement in decision making" was identified as the worst problem area. The three hospitals involved in this study introduced strategies to improve this dimension of patient satisfaction by launching information campaigns, producing or improving information brochures (particularly in hospitals A and C), and by expanding the preanesthetic care unit (hospital B). In 2002, a second survey was carried out. Each of the hospitals sent questionnaires to 600 elective surgery patients after discharge. We compared the total problem scores (the percentage of patients who responded that a problem was present) and the problem scores for the dimension 'information/involvement in decision making' between 2000 and 2002. RESULTS: The total problem score (mean in %, 95% confidence interval) for all three hospitals together remained unchanged [19% (1)], as well as the problem scores for each hospital [hospital A 16% (1), hospital B 21% (1), hospital C 20% (1)]. The problem score for 'information/involvement in decision making' remained unchanged also: 31% (29-33) in 2000 compared to 28% (26-30) in 2002. CONCLUSION: Information campaigns and the introduction of information leaflets alone do not improve patient satisfaction with anesthesia care.

Ibutilide versus amiodarone in atrial fibrillation: a double-blinded, randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: Ibutilide, a class III antiarrhythmic drug, has been shown to convert atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm more rapidly than procainamide or sotalol. Our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of ibutilide and amiodarone in patients after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Forty adults with an onset of atrial fibrillation within 3 hrs after admission. INTERVENTIONS: Before the administration of antiarrhythmic drugs, a 24-hr Holter electrocardiograph was attached. Patients in the ibutilide group received ibutilide 0.008 mg/kg body weight over 10 mins; treatment was repeated if atrial fibrillation or flutter persisted. If sinus rhythm was not achieved within 4 hrs, amiodarone 5 mg/kg was administered over 30 mins, followed by amiodarone 15 mg/kg over 24 hrs. Patients in the amiodarone group received amiodarone 5 mg/kg over 30 mins, followed by amiodarone 15 mg/kg over 24 hrs if atrial fibrillation or flutter continued. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Within the first 4 hrs, atrial fibrillation was converted in nine of 20 patients (45%) in group ibutilide and in ten of 20 patients (50%) in group amiodarone (not significant). Mean time for conversion overall was 385 mins in group ibutilide and 495 mins in group amiodarone (not significant). In group amiodarone, the protocol was discontinued in two patients because of severe arterial hypotension. Atrial fibrillation recurred in 11 of 20 patients (55%) in group ibutilide and in seven of 20 patients (35%) in group amiodarone (not significant). Ventricular arrhythmia did not occur during the first 24 hrs of the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Ibutilide has no significant advantage over amiodarone for the conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm in either time to conversion or conversion overall, but severe hypotension was not seen with ibutilide.