Obstetric consequences of a false-positive diagnosis of large-for-gestational-age fetus.

OBJECTIVE: To compare delivery outcomes between true-positive (TP) and false-positive (FP) large-for-gestational-age (LGA) fetuses, appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) fetuses, and false-negative (FN) LGA fetuses. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies at risk for macrosomia without contraindication to vaginal delivery, receiving an ultrasound scan at 34-37 weeks of pregnancy. RESULTS: In all, 430 pregnancies were included: 155 TP LGA, 87 FP LGA, 177 AGA and 11 FN LGA newborns. Cesarean section rate during labor was significantly higher in FP LGA than in AGA (19% vs. 8.7%) but not significantly different between FP LGA and TP LGA (19% vs. 32.4%). Median birth weight z score was significantly higher in TP LGA (1.9) compared with the FP LGA and AGA (0.91 and 0.84, respectively), whereas no significant differences were found between FP LGA and AGA. Admission to a neonatal intensive care unit was significantly more frequent in TP LGA than AGA, whereas shoulder dystocia, postpartum hemorrhage, and third- to fourth-degree perineal tears were similar between the different groups. CONCLUSION: A false-positive diagnosis of LGA fetus is associated with a significant increase of cesarean section during labor. Therefore, a suspicious ultrasound may result in reduction of the clinical threshold for the diagnosis of abnormal labor.

Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.

INTRODUCTION: Misoprostol vaginal insert could lead to a significant reduction in the time to vaginal delivery, and an increase in the proportion of women achieving vaginal delivery, compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert. We compared the delivery outcomes of misoprostol 200 µg vaginal insert and dinoprostone 10 mg vaginal insert for induction of labor in women with an unfavorable cervix. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study conducted on a cohort of 220 women with a Bishop score ≤4 admitted for induction of labor at a single institution. Of these, 109 (49.5%) received the misoprostol vaginal insert and 111 (50.5%) received the dinoprostone vaginal insert. The primary outcome was the vaginal delivery rate. Secondary outcomes were time from induction to vaginal delivery, time to any delivery mode, time from induction to the onset of active labor, oxytocin use, uterine tachysystole and need for tocolysis. RESULTS: The vaginal delivery rate was 88% in the misoprostol insert group, compared with 74% in the dinoprostone insert group (P < 0.007). The average time from drug administration to the beginning of labor was shorter in the misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone group (855 min vs 1740 min, P < 0.0001). Also, the average time from administration to delivery was shorter for women receiving misoprostol compared with dinoprostone (1113 min vs 2150 min, P < 0.0001). The use of misoprostol reduced the need for oxytocin compared with dinoprostone (30.2% vs 43.2%, P = 0.046). Finally, compared with dinoprostone, the misoprostol insert was associated with more uterine tachysystole (38% vs 12%, P < 0.001), but the rate of tachysystole requiring tocolysis was not significantly different between the 2 groups (51.2% vs 46.1%, P = 0.1). Multivariate analysis showed that Bishop score and method of induction, but not maternal body mass index or gestational age at induction, were independently associated with mode of delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The cesarean section rate was significantly lower in the misoprostol insert group. The use of misoprostol was also associated with reduced time to vaginal delivery and time to onset of active labor and with decreased use of oxytocin. Tachysystole was a frequent complication during induction of labor with the misoprostol insert.

The prognostic role of various indices and ratios of Doppler velocimetry in patients with pre-eclampsia.

Doppler velocimetry is a non-invasive method to monitor pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia. We aimed to assess the predictive value of adverse perinatal or maternal outcome of three ratios, i.e. middle cerebral to umbilical arteries pulsatility indices (PI), middle cerebral to uterine arteries PI and uterine to umbilical arteries PI, compared with that of uterine and umbilical arteries PI in pre-eclamptic patients. This is a cohort study on 168 singleton pregnancies between January 2010 and June 2013. Doppler velocimetry was performed at the diagnosis of pre-eclampsia. Logistic regression analysis was performed and receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves were calculated to determine the predictive ability of each Doppler index. Multivariate analysis was run to adjust results for confounding parameters. Seventy-eight cases were complicated by adverse perinatal outcome, 79 by maternal one, 49 by both. Considering perinatal outcome, area under ROC curve was 0.730 for uterine arteries PI, 0.691 for umbilical artery PI and 0.834 for middle cerebral to uterine arteries PI ratio, while for maternal one 0.720 for uterine arteries PI, 0.686 for umbilical artery PI and 0.817 for middle cerebral to uterine arteries PI ratio. At multivariate analysis, only middle cerebral to uterine arteries PI ratio remain statistically significant for both outcomes (p = 0.001). The cited ratio appeared more accurate than all other considered indices in predicting perinatal and maternal outcomes in patients affected by pre-eclampsia.