Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
2.
Qual Life Res ; 24(5): 1033-41, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25560774

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To provide an overview of PCORI's approach to engagement in research. METHODS: The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) was established in 2010 to fund patient-centered comparative effectiveness research. Requirements for research funding from PCORI include meaningful engagement of patients and other stakeholders in the research. PCORI's approach to engagement in research is guided by a conceptual model of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR), that provides a structure for understanding engagement in research. RESULTS: To understand and improve engagement in research PCORI is learning from awardees and other stakeholders. Those efforts are described along with PCORI's capacity building and guidance to awardees via the Engagement Rubric. PCORI's unique model of engaging patients and other stakeholders in merit review of funding applications is also described. Additional support for learning about engagement in research is provided through specific research funding and through PCORI's major infrastructure initiative, PCORnet. CONCLUSION: PCORI requires engagement of stakeholders in the research it funds. In addition PCORI engages stakeholders in activities including review of funding applications and establishment of CER research infrastructure through PCORnet. The comprehensive approach to engagement is being evaluated to help guide the field toward promising practices in research engagement.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Participação do Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodos , Academias e Institutos , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida
4.
Handb Exp Pharmacol ; 205: 219-44, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21882114

RESUMO

The critical need for pediatric research on drugs and biological products underscores the responsibility to ensure that children are enrolled in clinical research that is both scientifically necessary and ethically sound. In this chapter, we review key ethical considerations concerning the participation of children in clinical research. We propose a basic ethical framework to guide pediatric research, and suggest how this framework might be operationalized in linking science and ethics. Topics examined include: the status of children as a vulnerable population; the appropriate balance of risk and potential benefit in research; ethical considerations underlying study design, including clinical equipoise, placebo controls, and non-inferiority designs; the use of data monitoring committees; compensation; and parental permission and child assent to participate in research. We incorporate selected national (USA) and international guidelines, as well as regulatory approaches to pediatric studies that have been adopted in the USA, Canada, and Europe.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/ética , Projetos de Pesquisa Epidemiológica , Pediatria/ética , Algoritmos , Canadá , Comitês de Monitoramento de Dados de Ensaios Clínicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto/ética , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto/normas , Compensação e Reparação/ética , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados como Assunto/ética , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados como Assunto/normas , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Consentimento Informado por Menores/legislação & jurisprudência , Consentimento dos Pais/legislação & jurisprudência , Placebos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Equipolência Terapêutica , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...