Adaptive change in simulation education: Comparison of effectiveness of a communication skill curriculum on death notification using in person methods versus a digital communication platform.

Background: Mandates to social distance and "shelter in place" during the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the exploration of new academic content delivery methods. Digital communication platforms (DCP; e.g., Zoom) were widely used to facilitate content delivery, yet little is known about DCP's capacity or effectiveness, especially for simulation. Objective: The objective was to compare the experience, outcomes, and resources required to implement a simulation-based communication skill curriculum on death notification to a cohort of learners using in-person versus DCP delivery of the same content. Methods: We used the GRIEV_ING mnemonic to train students in death notification techniques either in person or utilizing a DCP. For all learners, three measures were collected: knowledge, confidence, and performance. Individual learners completed knowledge and confidence assessments pre- and postintervention. All performance assessments were completed by standardized patients (SPs) in real time. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to identify differences in individual and between-group performances. Results: Thirty-four learners participated (N = 34), 22 in person and 12 via DCP. There was a statistically significant improvement in both groups for all three measures: knowledge, confidence, and performance. Between-group comparisons revealed a difference in pretest confidence but no differences between groups in knowledge or performance. More preparation and prior planning were required to set up the DCP environment than the in-person event. Conclusions: The in-person and DCP delivery of death notification training were comparable in their ability to improve individual knowledge, confidence, and performance. Additional preparation time, training, and practice with DCPs may be required for SPs, faculty, and learners less familiar with this technology.

Ancillary Findings on CT Pulmonary Angiograms that are Negative for Pulmonary Embolism.

CONTEXT: One advantage of computed tomographic pulmonary angiograms (CTPA) is that they often show pathology in patients in whom pulmonary embolism (PE) has been excluded. In this investigation, we identified the ancillary findings on CTPAs that were negative for PE to obtain an impression of the type of findings shown. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of findings on CTPAs that were negative for PE obtained in nine emergency departments between January 2016 - February 2018. Ancillary findings were assessed by review of the radiographic reports. RESULTS: Ancillary findings were identified in N=338 (40.9%) of 825 patients with CTPAs that were negative for PE. Most ancillary findings, 254 (75.1%) of 338 were pulmonary or pleural abnormalities. Liver, gall bladder, kidney, or pancreatic abnormalities were shown in 26 (7.7%) cases, and abnormalities of the heart or great vessels were shown in 23 (6.8%) of cases. Abnormalities of the esophagus or intestine were shown in 12 (3.6%), abnormalities of the thyroid in 10 (3.0%) and abnormalities of bone or soft tissue lesions were shown in three (0.9%) cases. Inferential statistical procedures demonstrated that the occurrence of ancillary findings in patients with negative CTPAs was proportionately greater in patients who were 50 years and older (p < 0.001), although not between genders (p = 0.145). CONCLUSIONS: Ancillary findings on CTPAs that were negative for PE were frequently reported. Future studies might focus of the extent to which ancillary findings on CTPA assisted physicians in management of the patient.