Using conjoint analysis to measure the importance of psychosocial traits in the choices of bladder management after spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a conjoint analysis experiment to better understand the psychosocial priorities related to bladder management in individuals after spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: We developed a conjoint analysis survey that included 11 psychosocial attributes phrased in the context of bladder management (including attributes for urinary infections, and incontinence). We then performed a multi-center prospective cross-sectional study of adults with existing SCI which consisted of a baseline interview, followed by the online conjoint analysis survey (delivered through Sawtooth software). Hierarchical Bayes random effects regression analysis was used to determine the relative importance of the attributes. RESULTS: A total of 345 people complete the study. There was good representation of both men and women, and individuals with cervical and thoracic or lower lesions. The most important attribute was the frequency of urinary infections. Age, sex, and level of SCI were generally not related to the attributes measured in the study. In the subgroup of 256 patients who used a catheter for bladder management, significantly more importance was placed on urinary tract infections, time, fluid intake, and social life among indwelling catheter users compared to intermittent catheter users. CONCLUSIONS: Most bladder-related psychosocial priorities are not impacted by a patient's age, sex or level of SCI. Differences in psychosocial priorities between indwelling and intermittent catheter users may represent factors that should be focused on to optimize bladder management after SCI.

A qualitative assessment of psychosocial aspects that play a role in bladder management after spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective qualitative study using semi-structured, open-ended interviews. OBJECTIVES: To better understand psychosocial aspects of bladder management after spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: People with SCI, recruited through three tertiary care centres in North America. METHODS: Thirty-four community-dwelling individuals with SCI were selected using purposive sampling to ensure men and women with both tetraplegia and paraplegia were represented. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. NVivo software was used to code psychosocial domains, medical complications, and methods of bladder management. A qualitative interpretive approach was used, and four participants participated in a debrief session to review the study findings. RESULTS: The median age was 49 (IQR 40-62) years and 61% (21/34) were male. Most had complete injuries (AIS A, 47%, 16/34), and most had a cervical lesion (56%, 19/34). There was a large range of time living with a SCI (median 20 years, IQR 9-31), and most participants managed their bladder with intermittent catheterisation (67% 23/34). The five most common psychosocial domains were anxiety (often in the context of urinary infections, incontinence, or not being able to catheterise), loss of control (due to irregular bladder behaviour), and embarrassment (from incontinence occurring in public); the domains of confidence and independence/planning included both positive and negative examples of bladder management experiences. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated consistent psychosocial topics related to bladder management in people living with SCI. This information will help counsel people regarding bladder management and identify areas for education and optimisation of bladder function from a psychosocial perspective.