Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Radiol ; 65(2): 246-52, 2008 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17524585

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate retrospectively the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with spinal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients (25 men, 16 women; age range, 46-82 years) with nonresectable primary or secondary tumor involvement of the spine unresponsive to chemo- and radiotherapy received RFA treatment. Two radiofrequency ablation systems, one with a cool-tip electrode and one with an expandable electrode catheter, were used. Both systems work impedance controlled with a power output of 150- 200 W. Each coagulation cycle lasted 12-15 min depending on tumor impedance. Several single RFA cycles of 15 min each were used for overlapping RFAs in tumors with diameters of more than 3 cm. Temperature was kept between 50 degrees C and 120 degrees C and was chosen according to spinal cord distance and patient heat tolerance during the ablation. Multi-slice computed tomography (CT) combined with C-arm fluoroscopy guided the intervention. Efficacy outcomes were assessed after about 6 weeks, 6 months, and more than 6 months using standardized questionnaires and indices regarding tumor pain, pain disability, functional activities, quality of life, neurological status, and tumor progression. RESULTS: RFA significantly reduced tumor-induced pain within 6 weeks, improved daily activities, and maintained quality of life. Mean time to tumor progression was 730+/-54 days (Kaplan-Meier estimate). No RFA-associated complications were reported. CONCLUSION: RFA of primary and secondary spinal tumors, which were unresponsive to chemo- and radiotherapy and prone to progression, is a safe, resource-saving, and highly effective percutaneous technique in patients with nonresectable spinal tumors.


Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Radiografia Intervencionista , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 22(2): 300-6, 2004 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14722039

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Few options are available for pain relief in patients with bone metastases who fail standard treatments. We sought to determine the benefit of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in providing pain relief for patients with refractory pain secondary to metastases involving bone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one US and 12 European patients with painful osteolytic metastases involving bone were treated with image-guided RFA using a multitip needle. Treated patients had > or = 4/10 pain and had either failed or were poor candidates for standard treatments such as radiation or opioid analgesics. Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, worst pain intensity was the primary end point, with a 2-unit drop considered clinically significant. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were treated (median follow-up, 16 weeks). Before RFA, the mean score for worst pain was 7.9 (range, 4/10 to 10/10). Four, 12, and 24 weeks following treatment, worst pain decreased to 4.5 (P <.0001), 3.0 (P <.0001), and 1.4 (P =.0005), respectively. Ninety-five percent (41 of 43 patients) experienced a decrease in pain that was considered clinically significant. Opioid usage significantly decreased at weeks 8 and 12. Adverse events were seen in 3 patients and included (1) a second-degree skin burn at the grounding pad site, (2) transient bowel and bladder incontinence following treatment of a metastasis involving the sacrum, and (3) a fracture of the acetabulum following RFA of an acetabular lesion. CONCLUSION: RFA of painful osteolytic metastases provides significant pain relief for cancer patients who have failed standard treatments.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Neoplasias Ósseas/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Dor/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Ósseas/complicações , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteólise , Dor/etiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
4.
Cancer J ; 8(1): 33-9, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11898806

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Metastases to the spine are a challenging problem. Percutaneous, image-guided tumor ablation with a thermal energy source, such as radiofrequency, has received increasing attention as a promising technique for the treatment of focal malignant disease. We used radiofrequency ablation for patients with unresectable, osteolytic spine metastases under computed tomographic and fluoroscopic guidance. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of radiofrequency ablation as a palliative procedure to reduce pain and back pain-related disability in patients with vertebral and paravertebral spine tumors who were not able to benefit from radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 1999 and January 2001, 10 patients with unresectable spine metastases were treated with radiofrequency ablation. For the ablation we used a 50-W radiofrequency generator that is connected to an expandable electrode catheter (RITA Medical System Inc., Mountain View, CA). The mean patient age was 64.4 years. Metastases were ablated in the thoracic spine, the lumbar spine, and/or the sacral bone. Tumor diameter ranged from 1.5 to 9 cm. Combined computed tomographic and fluoroscopic guidance was used to guide the procedure. Operations were carried out without heavy sedation with the patient under local anesthesia only. The thermal lesion was produced by applying temperatures of 50 degrees to 120 degrees C for 8-12 minutes. Vertebroplasty was performed in four patients by use of 3 to 5.5 mL of polymethyl methacrylate. Therapy outcome was documented by magnet resonance imaging. Before the therapy and on follow-up of an average of 5.8 months, pain was assessed with the help of the Visual Analogue Scale. Back pain-related disability was measured with the Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire. Neurologic and health status were documented on the Frankel score and the Karnofsky index. RESULTS: At follow-up, 9 of 10 patients reported reduced pain (Visual Analogue Scale). In patients who experienced pain relief, there was an average relative pain reduction of 74.4%. Back pain-related disability was reduced by an average of 27%. Neurologic function was preserved in nine patients and improved in one. General health was stabilized in six patients, slightly increased (by 10%-20%) in two patients, significantly enhanced (by 50%) in one patient, and slightly reduced in one patient. No complications were reported. In the treated region, magnetic resonance imaging showed no further tumor growth after the therapy. DISCUSSION: Radiofrequency ablation was successfully performed in all 10 patients. Needles were placed accurately under image guidance, and a controlled lesion was created. Pain- and back pain-related disability was clearly reduced, and neurologic function was preserved or stabilized. When confirmed by further investigation, this therapy may be a new option for patients with unresectable spine tumors that do not respond to radiotherapy and chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter/instrumentação , Diatermia/instrumentação , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/secundário , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Idoso , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Diatermia/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...