A Pragmatic Randomized Trial Comparing Surgical Clipping and Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Surgical clipping and endovascular treatment are commonly used in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. We compared the safety and efficacy of the 2 treatments in a randomized trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clipping or endovascular treatments were randomly allocated to patients with one or more 3- to 25-mm unruptured intracranial aneurysms judged treatable both ways by participating physicians. The study hypothesized that clipping would decrease the incidence of treatment failure from 13% to 4%, a composite primary outcome defined as failure of aneurysm occlusion, intracranial hemorrhage during follow-up, or residual aneurysms at 1 year, as adjudicated by a core lab. Safety outcomes included new neurologic deficits following treatment, hospitalization of >5 days, and overall morbidity and mortality (mRS > 2) at 1 year. There was no blinding. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-one patients were enrolled from 2010 to 2020 in 7 centers. The 1-year primary outcome, ascertainable in 290/291 (99%) patients, was reached in 13/142 (9%; 95% CI, 5%-15%) patients allocated to surgery and in 28/148 (19%; 95% CI, 13%-26%) patients allocated to endovascular treatments (relative risk: 2.07; 95% CI, 1.12-3.83; P = .021). Morbidity and mortality (mRS >2) at 1 year occurred in 3/143 and 3/148 (2%; 95% CI, 1%-6%) patients allocated to surgery and endovascular treatments, respectively. Neurologic deficits (32/143, 22%; 95% CI, 16%-30% versus 19/148, 12%; 95% CI, 8%-19%; relative risk: 1.74; 95% CI, 1.04-2.92; P = .04) and hospitalizations beyond 5 days (69/143, 48%; 95% CI, 40%-56% versus 12/148, 8%; 95% CI, 5%-14%; relative risk: 0.18; 95% CI, 0.11-0.31; P < .001) were more frequent after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical clipping is more effective than endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in terms of the frequency of the primary outcome of treatment failure. Results were mainly driven by angiographic results at 1 year.

Repeat resection in recurrent glioblastoma (3rGBM) Trial: A randomized care trial.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is dismal, and the question of repeat surgery at time of recurrence is common. Re-operation in the management of these patients remains controversial, as there is no randomized evidence of benefit. An all-inclusive pragmatic care trial is needed to evaluate the role of repeat resection. METHODS: 3rGBM is a multicenter, pragmatic, prospective, parallel-group randomized care trial, with 1:1 allocation to repeat resection or standard care with no repeat resection. To test the hypothesis that repeat resection can improve overall survival by at least 3 months (from 6 to 9 months), 250 adult patients with prior resection of pathology-proven glioblastoma for whom the attending surgeon believes repeat resection may improve quality survival will be enrolled. A surrogate measure of quality of life, the number of days outside of hospital/nursing/palliative care facility, will also be compared. Centers are invited to participate without financial compensation and without contracts. Clinicians may apply to local authorities to approve an investigator-led in-house trial, using a common protocol, web-based randomization platform, and simple standardized case report forms. DISCUSSION: The 3rGBM trial is a modern transparent care research framework with no additional risks, tests, or visits other than what patients would encounter in normal care. The burden of proof remains on repeat surgical management of recurrent GBM, because this management has yet to be shown beneficial. The trial is designed to help patients and surgeons manage the uncertainty regarding optimal care. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov. Unique identifier: NCT04838782.

Transcranial Doppler Velocities and Angiographic Vasospasm after SAH: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: After aneurysmal SAH, transcranial Doppler is commonly used to monitor cerebral vasospasm. The diagnostic accuracy of transcranial Doppler flow velocity values in detecting angiographic vasospasm in patients requiring urgent endovascular intervention has not been established. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of patients with aneurysmal SAH who underwent transcranial Doppler (index test) within 24 hours of conventional angiography (reference test). The judgment of 33%, 50%, and 66% degree of vessel narrowing on angiography was independently established by multiple neuroendovascular clinicians. Vessel-specific per-segment and per-patient transcranial Doppler velocities were studied using receiver operating characteristic curves, the Youden index, and minimal acceptable sensitivity models. Optimal mean flow-velocity thresholds were explored to calculate sensitivity and specificity using a per-patient judgment of vasospasm of at least 50% angiographic narrowing in any large arterial segment except A1. RESULTS: In 221 patients, vasospasm was found in 15%, 8%, and 4% of arteries when the degree of reference angiographic luminal narrowing was 33%, 50%, and 66%, respectively. Mean flow velocities were significantly higher in vasospastic segments (P = . 001), but per-segment exploratory analyses yielded unsound mean flow velocity thresholds. The Youden and minimal acceptable sensitivity models proposed mean flow velocity thresholds of approximately 160 cm/s for the anterior circulation and 80 cm/s for the posterior circulation in the per-patient diagnosis of angiographic vasospasm (≥50%), yielding a sensitivity of 80%-90% (95% CI, 0.77-0.96), but with a corresponding specificity of 50% (95% CI, 0.40-0.56). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a threshold transcranial Doppler mean flow-velocity value that would accurately diagnose ≥50% angiographic vasospasm remained elusive.

Noninvasive Angiographic Results of Clipped or Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms: An Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Noninvasive angiography is commonly used to assess the outcome of surgical or endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms in clinical series or randomized trials. We sought to assess whether a standardized 3-grade classification system could be reliably used to compare the CTA and MRA results of both treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic portfolio composed of CTAs of 30 clipped and MRAs of 30 coiled aneurysms was independently evaluated by 24 raters of diverse experience and training backgrounds. Twenty raters performed a second evaluation 1 month later. Raters were asked which angiographic grade and management decision (retreatment; close or long-term follow-up) would be most appropriate for each case. Agreement was analyzed using the Krippendorff α (αK) statistic, and the relationship between angiographic grade and clinical management choice, using the Fisher exact and Cramer V tests. RESULTS: Interrater agreement was substantial (αK = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.55-0.70); results were slightly better for MRA results of coiling (αK = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.76) than for CTA results of clipping (αK = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.69). Intrarater agreement was substantial to almost perfect. Interrater agreement regarding clinical management was moderate for both clipped (αK = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32-0.61) and coiled subgroups (αK = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34-0.54). The choice of clinical management was strongly associated with the size of the residuum (mean Cramer V = 0.77 [SD, 0.14]), but complete occlusions (grade 1) were followed more closely after coiling than after clipping (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: A standardized 3-grade scale was found to be a reliable and clinically meaningful tool to compare the results of clipping and coiling of aneurysms using CTA or MRA.

Reliability of the Diagnosis of Cerebral Vasospasm Using Catheter Cerebral Angiography: A Systematic Review and Inter- and Intraobserver Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conventional angiography is the benchmark examination to diagnose cerebral vasospasm, but there is limited evidence regarding its reliability. Our goals were the following: 1) to systematically review the literature on the reliability of the diagnosis of cerebral vasospasm using conventional angiography, and 2) to perform an agreement study among clinicians who perform endovascular treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Articles reporting a classification system on the degree of cerebral vasospasm on conventional angiography were systematically searched, and agreement studies were identified. We assembled a portfolio of 221 cases of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and asked 17 raters with different backgrounds (radiology, neurosurgery, or neurology) and experience (junior ≤10 and senior >10 years) to independently evaluate cerebral vasospasm in 7 vessel segments using a 3-point scale and to evaluate, for each case, whether findings would justify endovascular treatment. Nine raters took part in the intraobserver reliability study. RESULTS: The systematic review showed a very heterogeneous literature, with 140 studies using 60 different nomenclatures and 21 different thresholds to define cerebral vasospasm, and 5 interobserver studies reporting a wide range of reliability (κ = 0.14-0.87). In our study, only senior raters reached substantial agreement (κ ≥ 0.6) on vasospasm of the supraclinoid ICA, M1, and basilar segments and only when assessments were dichotomized (presence or absence of ≥50% narrowing). Agreement on whether to proceed with endovascular management of vasospasm was only fair (κ ≤ 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Research on cerebral vasospasm would benefit from standardization of definitions and thresholds. Dichotomized decisions by experienced readers are required for the reliable angiographic diagnosis of cerebral vasospasm.

A randomized trial of endovascular versus surgical management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Interim results from ISAT2.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Appropriate management of ruptured intracranial aneurysm (RIA) in patients eligible for surgical clipping but under-represented in or excluded from previous randomized trials remains undetermined. METHODS: The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial-2 (ISAT-2) is a randomized care trial comparing surgical versus endovascular treatment (EVT) of RIA. All patients considered for surgical clipping but eligible for endovascular treatment can be included. The primary endpoint is death or dependency on modified Rankin score (mRS>2) at 1 year. Secondary endpoints are 1 year angiographic results and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: An interim analysis was performed after 103 patients were treated from November 2012 to July 2017 in 4 active centers. Fifty-two of the 55 patients allocated to surgery were treated by clipping, and 45 of the 48 allocated to EVT were treated by coiling, with 3 crossovers in each arm. The main endpoint (1 year mRS>2), available for 76 patients, was reached in 16/42 patients allocated to clipping (38%; 95%CI: 25%-53%), and 10/34 patients allocated to coiling (29%; 17%-46%). One year imaging results were available in 54 patients: complete aneurysm occlusion was found in 23/27 patients allocated to clipping (85%; 67%-94%), and 18/27 patients allocated to coiling (67%; 47%-81%). Hospital stay exceeding 20 days was more frequent in surgery (26/55 [47%; 34%-60%]) than EVT (9/48 [19%; 10%-31%]). CONCLUSION: Ruptured aneurysm patients for whom surgical clipping may still be best can be managed in a randomized care trial, which is feasible in some centers. More participating centers are needed.

Intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy decisions in acute ischemic stroke: An interrater and intrarater agreement study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess agreement on intravenous tissue-plasminogen activator (IV tPA) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) management decisions in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Secondary objectives were to assess agreement on Diffusion-Weighted-Imaging-Alberta-Stroke-Program-EArly-CT-Score (DWI-ASPECTS), and clinicians' willingness to recruit patients in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing medical management with or without MT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies assessing agreement of IV tPA and MT were systematically reviewed. An electronic portfolio of 41 AIS patients was sent to randomly selected providers at French stroke centers. Raters were asked 4 questions for each case: (1) What is the DWI-ASPECTS? (2) Would you perform IV tPA? (3) Would you perform MT? (4) Would you include the patient in a RCT comparing standard medical therapy with or without MT? Twenty responders were randomly selected to study intrarater agreement. Agreement was assessed using Fleiss' Kappa statistics. RESULTS: The review yielded two single center studies involving 2-5 raters, with various results. The electronic survey was answered by 86 physicians (60 vascular neurologists and 26 interventional neuroradiologists). The interrater agreement was moderate for IV tPA treatment decisions (κ=0.565 [0.420-0.680]), but only fair for MT (κ=0.383 [0.289-0.491]) and for combined treatment decisions (κ=0.399 [0.320-0.486]). The intrarater agreement was at least substantial for the majority of raters. The interrater agreement for DWI-ASPECTS was fair (κ=0.325 [0.276-0.387]). Physicians were willing to include a mean of 14±9 patients (33.1%±21.7%) in a RCT. CONCLUSION: Disagreements regarding the use of IVtPA or MT in the management of AIS patients remain frequent. Further trials are needed to resolve the numerous areas of uncertainty.

Flow diversion of bifurcation aneurysms is more effective when the jailed branch is occluded: an experimental study in a novel canine model.

BACKGROUND: Flow diverters (FDs) are increasingly used for bifurcation aneurysms. Failure of aneurysm occlusion may be caused by residual flow maintaining patency of the jailed branch along with the aneurysm. Our aim was to test whether endovascular occlusion of the jailed branch could improve efficacy of flow diversion of bifurcation aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen wide-necked lingual-carotid artery bifurcation aneurysms were created in eight canines. Patent aneurysms were randomly allocated 4 weeks later to flow diversion combined with jailed branch occlusion using coils and/or Onyx (n=6) or flow diversion alone (n=8). Angiographic results of aneurysm occlusion at 3 months were scored using an ordinal scale. Pathology specimens were photographed and neointimal coverage estimated using a semiquantitative scoring system. RESULTS: Fourteen aneurysms were patent at 1 month. FD deployment was successful in all cases but, at 3-month follow-up, three devices had prolapsed into the aneurysm. None of the bifurcation aneurysms treated with FD alone were occluded at 3 months. Endovascular branch occlusion combined with flow diversion significantly improved aneurysm occlusion rates compared with flow diversion alone (median angiographic scores 2 vs 0: p=0.0137). Flow-limiting parent vessel stenosis was not observed in any arteries. Devices were covered with thick neointima in most cases, but patent aneurysms were associated with leaks or holes in the neointima covering the aneurysm neck. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment failures following flow diversion of bifurcation aneurysms can be caused by persistent flow to the jailed branch. Branch occlusion combined with flow diversion may improve angiographic occlusion scores of a canine bifurcation aneurysm model.

Dual-lumen balloon catheters may improve liquid embolization of vascular malformations: an experimental study in Swine.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Liquid embolic agents are increasingly used to treat vascular malformations. We sought to assess embolization with these agents by using a dual-lumen balloon catheter in an experimental setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen injections of liquid embolic agents were performed in the rete mirabile of swine. We used 3 methods to control liquid embolic agent reflux: 1) dual-lumen balloon-catheter (group A, n = 8); 2) injection of liquid embolic agent after proximal n-BCA plug formation through a second microcatheter (group B, n = 4); and 3) standard liquid embolic agent injection (group C, controls, n = 6). The following outcomes were graded by using ordinal scales by angiography, macrophotography, and radiography of retia after euthanasia: 1) angiographic and pathologic extent of liquid embolic agent embolization of the rete, 2) reflux of liquid embolic agents in the parent artery, and 3) density of liquid embolic agents in the proximal rete. Technical complications were also recorded. A successful injection was defined as an embolization that reached the contralateral rete without reflux into proximal external branches. Exact logistic regression analyses were performed to compare groups. RESULTS: There were significant differences among groups for reflux (P = .029) and liquid embolic agent density in the proximal rete (P = .014), while extension to the contralateral rete did not reach statistical significance (P = .07). Injections differed among groups (P = .004), with dual-lumen balloon-catheter injections more frequently successful compared with control injections (P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: Dual-lumen balloon catheters allowed better liquid embolic agent injections than standard injections.

Uncertainty and agreement regarding the role of flow diversion in the management of difficult aneurysms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The role of flow diversion in the management of aneurysms remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the community agreement regarding indications for flow diversion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A portfolio of 35 difficult aneurysm cases was sent to 40 clinicians with varying backgrounds and experience. Responders were asked whether they considered flow diversion a treatment option, whether other options were possible, whether recruitment in a randomized trial would be considered, and to select their final choice. Agreement was studied by using κ statistics. RESULTS: Decisions for flow diversion were more frequent (n = 300, 39%) than decisions to coil (n = 163, 21.2%), to observe (n = 121, 15.7%), to occlude the parent vessel (n = 102, 13.2%), or to clip (n = 66, 8.6%). Sidewall aneurysm morphology was associated with flow diversion as the final choice (P = .001). Interjudge agreement was fair at best (κ <0.3) for all cases and all judges, despite high certainty levels (range, 7.2-8.9 ± 2.0 on a 0-10 scale). Agreement was no better within specialties or with more experience. All patients were judged to have other treatment options. Judges were willing to offer trial participation in 417 of 741 (56.3%) scenarios, more frequently when the aneurysm was sidewall (P = .001) or in the anterior circulation (P = .028). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals did not agree regarding the indications for flow diversion. There is sufficient uncertainty to justify trials designed to protect patients from the potential risks of premature adoption of an innovation.

Inter- and intraobserver agreement in scoring angiographic results of intra-arterial stroke therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Angiographic results are commonly used as surrogate markers of the success of intra-arterial therapies for acute stroke. Inter- and intraobserver agreement in judging angiographic results remain poorly characterized. Our goal was to assess 2 commonly used revascularization scales. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A portfolio of 148 pre- and post treatment images of 37 cases of proximal anterior circulation occlusions was electronically sent to 12 expert observers who were asked to grade treatment outcomes according to recanalization (of arterial occlusive lesion) or reperfusion (TICI) scales. Three expert observers had to score treatment outcomes by using a similar portfolio of 32 patients or when they had full access to all angiographic data, twice for each method 3-12 months apart. Results were analyzed by using κ statistics. RESULTS: Agreement among 9 responding observers was moderate for both the TICI (κ = 0.45 ± 0.01) and arterial occlusive lesion (κ = 0.39 ± 0.16) scales. Agreement was similar (moderate) when 3 observers had access to a portfolio (κ = 0.59 ± 0.06 and 0.49 ± 0.07, respectively) or to the full angiographic data (κ = 0.54 ± 0.06 and 0.59 ± 0.07, respectively). Intraobserver agreement was "fair to moderate" for both methods. Interobserver agreement became "substantial" (>0.6) when outcomes were dichotomized into "success" (TICI 2b, 3; arterial occlusive lesion II, III or "failure"; the results were judged more favorably when the arterial occlusive lesion rather than the TICI scale was used. CONCLUSIONS: There is an important variability in the assessment of angiographic outcomes of endovascular treatments, invalidating comparisons among publications. A simple dichotomous judgment can be used as a surrogate outcome when treatments are assessed by the same observers in randomized trials.

Stent-assisted coiling of bifurcation aneurysms may improve endovascular treatment: a critical evaluation in an experimental model.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms often results in incomplete occlusion or aneurysm recurrence. The goals of this study were to compare results of coil embolization with or without the assistance of self-expandable stents and to examine how stents may influence neointima formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms were constructed in 24 animals and, after 4-6 weeks, were randomly allocated to 1 of 5 groups: 1) coil embolization using the assistance of 1 braided stent (n = 5); 2) coil embolization using the assistance of 2 braided stents in a Y configuration (n = 5); 3) coil embolization without stent assistance (n = 6); 4) Y-stenting alone (n = 4); and 5) untreated controls (n = 4). Angiographic results were compared at baseline and at 12 weeks, by using an ordinal scale. Neointima formation at the neck at 12 weeks was compared among groups by using a semiquantitative grading scale. Bench studies were performed to assess stent porosities. RESULTS: Initial angiographic results were improved with single stent-assisted coiling compared with simple coiling (P = .013). Angiographic results at 12 weeks were improved with any stent assistance (P = .014). Neointimal closure of the aneurysm neck was similar with or without stent assistance (P = .908), with neointima covering coil loops but rarely stent struts. Y-stent placement alone had no therapeutic effect. Bench studies showed that porosities can be decreased with stent compaction, but a relatively stable porous transition zone was a limiting factor. CONCLUSIONS: Stent-assisted coiling may improve results of embolization by allowing more complete initial coiling, but these high-porosity stents did not provide a scaffold for more complete neointimal closure of aneurysms.

Thrombosis heralding aneurysmal rupture: an exploration of potential mechanisms in a novel giant swine aneurysm model.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The relationship between aneurysm dimensions, flow, thrombosis, and rupture remains poorly understood. We attempted to clarify this relationship by exploring various swine aneurysm models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bilateral carotid aneurysms were constructed according to 3 protocols in 24 animals: small aneurysms with wide necks (group 1; n = 6 animals); small aneurysms with small necks (group 2; n = 4 animals), and giant aneurysms with large necks (group 3; n = 14 animals). Group 3 included 3 subgroups, related to testing the model in various experimental conditions: The neck was clipped in 3 animals; venous pouches lacked an endothelial lining in 4 animals; and 7 were control animals. Animals were followed until rupture, or for 1-4 weeks. Angiography was performed postoperatively and before euthanasia. We studied lesion pathology, paying attention to thrombosis, recanalization, wall composition, and perianeurysmal hemorrhage. RESULTS: Groups differed significantly in aneurysm dimensions and aspect ratio (P = .002). Ruptures occurred more frequently in animals with untreated giant aneurysms (7/7) than in animals with small wide-neck (0/6) or small-neck (2/4) aneurysms (P = .002). Ruptures occurred only in animals with thrombosed aneurysms. Lesions lacking an endothelial lining and 5 of 6 clipped venous pouches thrombosed but did not rupture. One giant lesion ruptured despite complete clipping. The wall was deficient in α-actin and was infiltrated with inflammatory cells and erythrocytes in all thrombosed cases, ruptured or not. Ruptures were associated with recanalizing channels in 9 of 10 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombosis, inflammation, and recanalization may precipitate aneurysmal ruptures in a swine model.

Flow diverters can occlude aneurysms and preserve arterial branches: a new experimental model.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: FDs are new intracranial stents designed to occlude aneurysms while preserving flow to jailed arterial branches. We tested this fundamental principle in a new aneurysm model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Canine lateral wall aneurysms, featuring a branch located immediately opposite the aneurysm, were created in 16 animals to study the effects on aneurysm or branch occlusion using single HP stents (n = 4), 2 overlapping HP stents (n = 4), or an FD (n = 8). Two other animals, in which an efferent arterial branch was anastomosed to the aneurysm fundus, were also treated with FDs. Angiographic results after deployment, at 2 weeks, and at 3 months were scored using an ordinal scale. The metal porosity of the FSS and the amount of FSS neointima formation was determined by postmortem photography. RESULTS: FDs led to better angiographic occlusion scores compared with HP stents (P = .026). FDs were significantly more likely to occlude the aneurysm than the branch (P = .01). When the branch was switched to originate from the aneurysm fundus, the FDs became ineffective (0/2). Neointimal closure of the aneurysm ostium was significantly better with FDs than with single or double HP stents (P = .039). Angiographic occlusion correlated with metallic porosity and neointimal tissue coverage (Spearman ρ = -0.81; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, flow diverters occluded lateral wall aneurysms more readily than branches. Metal device porosity strongly influenced the occlusion rate.

Outcomes of endovascular treatments of aneurysms: observer variability and implications for interpreting case series and planning randomized trials.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Angiographic results are commonly used as a surrogate marker of success of coiling of intracranial aneurysms. Inter- and intraobserver agreement in judging angiographic results remain poorly characterized. Our goal was to offer such an evaluation of a grading scale commonly used to evaluate results of endovascular treatment of aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A portfolio of 90 angiographic images from 45 patients selected from the core lab data base of a randomized trial was sent to 12 observers on 2 occasions more than 3 months apart. The variability of a 3-value grading scale used to score angiographic results and of a final judgment regarding the presence of a recurrence was studied using κ statistics. RESULTS: Ten participants responded once and 6 responded twice. Agreement was poor to moderate (κ = 0.28-0.5) for senior and junior observers judging angiographic results immediately or 12-18 months after treatment. Agreement reached a reassuring "substantial" (κ = 0.62) level, with a dichotomous presence-absence of a major recurrence, and intraobserver agreement was better in experienced core lab assessors. CONCLUSIONS: There is an important variability in the assessment of angiographic outcomes of endovascular treatments, rendering comparisons between publications risky, if not invalid. A simple dichotomous judgment can be used as a surrogate outcome in randomized trials designed to assess the value of new endovascular devices.

Testing flow diverters in giant fusiform aneurysms: a new experimental model can show leaks responsible for failures.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: FDs are the latest, most promising tool to treat giant and complex aneurysms. Currently available experimental aneurysm models do not reproduce the potential clinical difficulties of treating these lesions with FDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six large or giant canine fusiform aneurysms were created on the distal carotid arteries of 4 animals. Four of the aneurysms had multiple arterial branches originating from the aneurysm; 2 other aneurysms had all branches clipped at the time of aneurysm construction. Aneurysms were treated with multiple telescoping prototype flow-diverting stents (total of 15 FDs). Angiography was carried out before and immediately after implantation, at 2 weeks, and immediately before sacrifice at 12 weeks. Macroscopic photography of specimens was performed, followed by biopsies of selected regions of the tissue formed on the surface of FDs. RESULTS: Technical or device-related difficulties occurred in 2 of 6 aneurysm treatments. Fusiform aneurysms with branches intact remained widely patent (mean angiographic score, 3), whereas aneurysms with clipped branches had only small residua (mean angiographic score, 1) at 12 weeks. The presence of very small defects in neointima formation on the surface of FDs, or leaks, was sufficient for residual filling of the aneurysms, which served as reservoirs to feed branches. CONCLUSIONS: Experimental canine fusiform carotid aneurysms may reproduce many of the difficulties associated with the treatment of giant aneurysms and could be appropriate for preclinical testing of FD stents.

A new canine carotid artery bifurcation aneurysm model for the evaluation of neurovascular devices.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stents are increasingly used for coiling of difficult aneurysms, to reduce the risk of recurrences, or to modify blood flow. Currently available bifurcation aneurysm models are ill-suited to assess stent performance before clinical use. We designed a new wide-neck canine T-type bifurcation aneurysm model. Its potential value as a training tool as well as in the evaluation of new techniques or embolic agents was assessed. Our first task was to verify that recurrences occurred after satisfactory coiling. A second aim of this preliminary work was to assess if the new model could recreate the technical challenges involved in bifurcation aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We introduce a new canine wide-neck bifurcation aneurysm model, created by using a vein pouch at the apex of an end-to-side anastomosis of the carotid arteries, with flow reversal in the proximal RCA by ligation of the innominate artery. Three aneurysms were treated with coil embolization, 10 were treated with stents (7 self-expandable, 3 balloon-expandable), and 3 were left untreated. Aneurysms were followed by duplex ultrasonography and angiography, and studied with macroscopic photography after euthanasia 11.8 +/- 3.9 months after surgery. RESULTS: All aneurysms remained patent at 9.0 +/- 3.6 months' follow-up. Coiling led to recurrences by 3 months in all 3 cases. Stent placement was technically difficult in all cases and did not lead to aneurysm thrombosis or neointimal closure of the aneurysm neck at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: This model may be suitable for studying the effects of endovascular treatment on aneurysm and branch occlusion rates, for preclinical testing of stents and other intravascular devices, and for training students of endovascular technique.

Mechanisms of occlusion and recanalization in canine carotid bifurcation aneurysms embolized with platinum coils: an alternative concept.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endovascular treatment of aneurysms may result in complete or incomplete occlusions or may be followed by recurrences. The goal of the present study was to better define pathologic features associated with so-called healing or recurrences after coiling and to propose an alternative concept to the currently accepted view. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental canine venous pouch aneurysms were created by using a T-type (group A, N = 29) or a Y-type constructed bifurcation (group B, N = 37) between the carotid arteries. Coil embolization was performed 2 weeks later; and angiography, immediately after and at 12 weeks. Angiographic results, neointima formation at the neck, endothelialization, and organization of thrombus were compared between groups by using qualitative scores and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Angiographic results at 3 months were significantly better in group A than in group B (P = .001). Macroscopic neointimal scores were also better (P = .012). Only 10/32 aneurysms with satisfactory results at angiography were completely sealed by neointima formation. Animals with residual or recurrent aneurysms had significantly worse neointimal scores than those with completely occluded ones (P = .0003). On histologic sections, the neointima was constantly present in "healed" and in recurrent aneurysms. This neointima was a multicellular layer of alpha-actin+ cells in a collagenous matrix, covered with a single layer of nitric oxide synthetase (NOS+) endothelial cells, whether it completely occluded the neck of the aneurysm or dived into the recurring or residual space between the aneurysm wall and the coil mass embedded in organizing thrombus. CONCLUSION: Complete angiographic occlusions at 3 months can be associated with incomplete neointimal closure of the neck at pathology. Thrombus organization, endothelialization, and neointima formation can occur concurrently with recurrences.

Interventional neuroradiology: the role of experimental models in scientific progress.

SUMMARY: The ultimate methodology necessary to adopt a treatment as generally beneficial is the randomized controlled trial, a method designed by and for clinicians to maximize the care of their patients in the presence of uncertainty. Some selection is however necessary to limit trials to more promising and less risky endeavors. Experimental models are the privileged answer to the problem of finding scientific evidence while refraining from harming patients in the course of this pursuit. They allow a step by step assessment, from simple but artificial settings to more complex and realistic animal models. But the use of animal models can only be justified if the community can be convinced that alternatives have been considered but are invalid, when the project is scientifically sound and methodologically irreproachable. As neurointerventional methods develop and gain wider clinical applications, progress should proceed in an orderly fashion, within limits set by prudence and human values, from the less risky, costly, time consuming methods, to the more definite, pragmatic, labor intensive but inescapable clinical trials. Each step is essential and the sequence cannot be violated without risks of errors that eventually translate into clinical morbidity.