Clinical efficacy of intravenous followed by oral azithromycin monotherapy in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. The Azithromycin Intravenous Clinical Trials Group.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate intravenous (i.v.) azithromycin followed by oral azithromycin as a monotherapeutic regimen for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Two trials of i.v. azithromycin used as initial monotherapy in hospitalized CAP patients are summarized. Clinical efficacy is reported from an open-label randomized trial of azithromycin compared to cefuroxime with or without erythromycin. Bacteriologic and clinical efficacy results are also presented from a noncomparative trial of i.v. azithromycin that was designed to give additional clinical experience with a larger number of pathogens. Azithromycin was administered to 414 patients: 202 and 212 in the comparative and noncomparative trials, respectively. The comparator regimen was used as treatment for 201 patients; 105 were treated with cefuroxime alone and 96 were given cefuroxime plus erythromycin. In the comparative trial, clinical outcome data were available for 268 evaluable patients with confirmed CAP at the 10- to 14-day visit, with 106 (77%) of the azithromycin patients cured or improved and 97 (74%) of the comparator patients cured or improved. Mean i.v. treatment duration and mean total treatment duration (i.v. and oral) for the clinically evaluable patients were significantly (P < 0.05) shorter for the azithromycin group (3.6 days for the i.v. group and 8.6 days for the i.v. and oral group) than for the evaluable patients given cefuroxime plus erythromycin (4.0 days for the i.v. group and 10.3 days for the i.v. and oral group). The present comparative study demonstrates that initial therapy with i.v. azithromycin for hospitalized patients with CAP is associated with fewer side effects and is equal in efficacy to a 1993 American Thoracic Society-suggested regimen of cefuroxime plus erythromycin when the erythromycin is deemed necessary by clinicians.

Multicenter, randomized study comparing levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin for uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections.

BACKGROUND: The fluoroquinolone, levofloxacin, is active against most common pathogens in skin and skin structure infections. METHODS: The efficacy, tolerability, and safety of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were compared in a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial of patients with uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections. Of 469 patients treated, 231 received levofloxacin (500 mg qd) and 238 were given ciprofloxacin (500 mg bid). RESULTS: Overall clinical success rates (cured plus improved) for levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were 98% and 94%, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI], -7.7, 0.7). Overall microbiologic eradication rates by patient were 98% in the levofloxacin group and 89% in the ciprofloxacin group (95% CI, -14.5, -2.7), whereas eradication rates by pathogen were 98% and 90%, respectively (95% CI, -12.6, -3.7). The eradication rate for Staphylococcus aureus was 100% in the levofloxacin group and 87% in the ciprofloxacin group (95% CI, -20.2, -5.1). Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable, with drug-related adverse events reported in 6% of levofloxacin patients and 5% of ciprofloxacin patients. CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin is as effective and safe as ciprofloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections.