Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 71, 2024 Jan 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38238647

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aging and type-2 diabetes (T2D) are the most important risk factors for cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Exercise training is an effective, safe, and practical intervention in improving glucose metabolism, physical function, and cognitive disorders. This pilot study investigated the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of high-intensity low-volume (HIFT) vs. low-intensity high-volume (LIFT) functional training in elderly T2D patients with cognitive impairment. METHODS: Forty-eight elderly T2D patients (31 female, 17 male, age 67.5 ± 5.8 years, MMSE score 18.8 ± 2.6, FBG 209.5 ± 37.9) were randomly assigned to HIFT, LIFT and control groups. Cognitive impairment was diagnosed with MMSE ≤ 23 based Iranian society. The SDMT, CVLT-II, BVMT-R, and Stroop tests were used to evaluated processing speed, learning, memory and attention respectively. Physical fitness tests include: tandem stance and walk test; TUG; 6MWT, 10MWT; SSST; 5TSTS; and hand grip was used to evaluated static and dynamic balance, agility, walking endurance, gait speed, lower limb function and lower and upper body strength respectively. As well as, Biochemical (FBG, insulin, HOMA-IR, HbA1c) and physiological outcomes (SBP, and DBP) were assessed. The HIFT group performed six weeks of functional training (three sessions per week) with 120-125% of the lactate threshold. The LIFT group performed six weeks of functional training (five sessions per week) with a 70-75% lactate threshold. Feasibility, safety, and acceptability of exercise programs were assessed at the end of the study. RESULT: HIFT showed a higher adherence rate (91% vs. 87.5%), safety, and acceptability compared to LIFT. MMSE and Stroop scores, 6MWT, FBG, insulin, HOMA-IR, HbA1c, SBP, and DBP significantly improved in HIFT (all, P ≤ 0.004) and LIFT (all, P ≤ 0.023). Changes in 6MWT, FBG, insulin, HOMA-IR, and HbA1c in HIFT (all, P ≤ 0.001) and LIFT (all, P ≤ 0.008) were significant compared to the control group. Changes in Stroop scores were significant only in the HIFT group compared to the control group (P = 0.013). SDMT, CVLT-II, BVMT-R, balance test, 10MWT, SSST, TUG and hang grip significantly improved only in HIFT (all, P ≤ 0.038). CONCLUSION: HIFT vs. LIFT is a safe, feasible, and effective approach for improving some aspects of physical, biochemical, and cognitive function in elderly T2D patients with cognitive impairment. This pilot study provides initial proof-of-concept data for the design and implementation of an appropriately powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) of HIFT vs. LIFT in a larger sample of elderly T2D patients with cognitive impairment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) (Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, trial registration number: IRCT20230502058055N1. Date of registration: 11/06/2023.


Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Insulinas , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Idoso , Projetos Piloto , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Estudos de Viabilidade , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Disfunção Cognitiva/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Lactatos , Terapia por Exercício
2.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 55: 103177, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34343867

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Substantial evidence supports the benefits of supervised exercise training (ET) in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, there are limitations such as transportation problems preventing physical activity for some people with MS. One opportunity for increasing physical activity participant in people with MS is home-based exercise training (HBET), yet we are unaware of a systematic review of HBET in people with MS. We undertook a systematic review for enhancing the knowledge about HBET in people with MS. METHODS: To identify eligible studies, we included the medical subject headings (MeSH) keywords including 'multiple sclerosis' OR 'MS' OR 'degenerative nerve disease' AND 'home-based exercise' OR 'home-based training' OR 'home-based balance training' OR 'home-based rehabilitation' OR 'physical telerehabilitation' OR 'home-based walking' OR 'home-based step training.' Studies were included in this review that examined the effect of HBET in people with MS, were written in English, and available in full-text. RESULTS: According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 studies were judged eligible to be included in this systematic review. The results indicated that a total number of 10 studies had mainly implemented combined ET interventions. Balance and aerobic ET had been included in 5 studies. Three studies had further administered resistance ET interventions and one study had applied exergaming. Moreover, 13 studies had focused on the effects of ET on physical fitness, one article had reflected on the impact of ET on fatigue, and nine cases had included fatigue, quality of life, and fitness as outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Home-based ET, 2-7 times per week, is beneficial, feasible, and safe in people with MS. Nevertheless, there were notable limitations, including (a) adherence to interventions, which needs to be addressed in future studies, and (b) disability-related outcomes which should be considered in future HBET studies.


Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla , Exercício Físico , Terapia por Exercício , Fadiga , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Caminhada
3.
BMC Geriatr ; 21(1): 433, 2021 07 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34284726

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Interorgan communication networks established during exercise in several different tissues can be mediated by several exercise-induced factors. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of resistance-type training using elastic band-induced changes of myomiRs (i.e., miR-206 and miR-133), vitamin D, CTX-I, ALP, and FRAX® score in elderly women with osteosarcopenic obesity (OSO). METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 63 women (aged 65-80 years) with Osteosarcopenic Obesity were recruited and assessed, using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry instrument. The resistance-type training via elastic bands was further designed three times per week for 12-weeks. The main outcomes were Fracture Risk Assessment Tool score, bone mineral content, bone mineral density, vitamin D, alkaline phosphatase, C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen, expression of miR-206 and miR-133. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the study groups in terms of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool score (p = 0.067), vitamin D (p = 0.566), alkaline phosphatase (p = 0.334), C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (p = 0.067), microR-133 (p = 0.093) and miR-206 (p = 0.723). CONCLUSION: Overall, the results of this study illustrated 12-weeks of elastic band resistance training causes a slight and insignificant improvement in osteoporosis markers in women affected with Osteosarcopenic Obesity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) (Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, trial registration number: IRCT20180627040260N1 . Date of registration: 27/11/2018.


Assuntos
MicroRNAs , Osteoporose , Treinamento Resistido , Sarcopenia , Absorciometria de Fóton , Idoso , Densidade Óssea , Feminino , Humanos , Obesidade/terapia
4.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 43: 102143, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32473563

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To date, studies examining the effect of exercise on neurotrophic factors in MS are contradictory, and this may be explained, in part, by moderators such as disability status. To investigating the effect of a 12-week (3sessions/week) supervised multimodal exercise program on neurotrophic factors levels. METHODS: Ninety four women with MS were randomly assigned into exercise or control conditions with randomization stratified by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores of low (EDSS< 4.5), moderate (4.5 ≤EDSS≤ 6), or high (EDSS≥ 6.5) disability. The exercise program comprised resistance, endurance, Pilates, balance and stretch exercises. Resting level of neurotrophic factors, aerobic capacity, one-repetition maximum, and physiological cost index (PCI) were evaluated before and after the intervention period. RESULTS: Exercise training improved brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neurotrophin (NT)-3, and NT-4/5 levels. The effect of exercise on NT-3 was dependent on disability status such that exercise groups with low and high disability had more pronounced changes compared with other condition. There were no exercise effects on ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) and glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF). Aerobic capacity and one-repetition maximum, but not PCI, were improved with exercise independent of disability status. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise can stimulate neurotrophic production and secretion, and this is generally not influenced by disability status. Exercise training may be an adjuvant for disease-modifying therapy among people with MS, and its effect may not be moderated by disability status.


Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência , Terapia por Exercício , Esclerose Múltipla , Fator Neurotrófico Derivado do Encéfalo , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...