Risk factors for diphtheria in Sana'a, Yemen, 2019: a matched case-control study.

Objective: To identify risk factors for diphtheria related to sociodemographic, immunization and household status, and source of infection in Sana'a. Methods: A retrospective matched case-control study (1:2 ratio) was conducted. Cases were defined as patients who met the World Health Organization's definition of confirmed diphtheria living in Sana'a between January and November 2019. Controls were defined as subjects without a history of diphtheria infection, living in the same neighbourhood, and matched with cases by age and sex. Crude odds ratios, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate associations between risk factors and diphtheria. Results: In total, 76 confirmed cases and 152 controls were enrolled in this study. Multi-variate analysis found significant associations between diphtheria infection and sharing a bedroom with at least two people (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.2-6.6), non-vaccination (aOR 2.6, 95% CI 1.2-6.0) and contact with a diphtheria case (aOR 10.6, 95% CI 2.6-43.6). Conclusions: This study found that vaccination, not sharing a bedroom with at least two people, and isolation of diphtheria cases to prevent contact with non-infected individuals were the most important measures for protection of the community from diphtheria. Raising community awareness about vaccination, transmission and preventive measures is recommended.

Field Epidemiology Training Program Response to COVID-19 During a Conflict: Experience From Yemen.

COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the need for a well-trained public health workforce to save lives through timely outbreaks detection and response. In Yemen, a country that is entering its seventh year of a protracted war, the ongoing conflict severely limited the country's capacity to implement effective preparedness and response measures to outbreaks including COVID-19. There are growing concerns that the virus may be circulating within communities undetected and unmitigated especially as underreporting continues in some areas of the country due to a lack of testing facilities, delays in seeking treatment, stigma, difficulty accessing treatment centers, the perceived risks of seeking care or for political issues. The Yemen Field Epidemiology Training Program (FETP) was launched in 2011 to address the shortage of a skilled public health workforce, with the objective of strengthening capacity in field epidemiology. Thus, events of public health importance can be detected and investigated in a timely and effective manner. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Yemen FETP's response has been instrumental through participating in country-level coordination, planning, monitoring, and developing guidelines/standard operating procedures and strengthening surveillance capacities, outbreak investigations, contact tracing, case management, infection prevention, and control, risk communication, and research. As the third wave is circulating with a steeper upward curve than the previous ones with possible new variants, the country will not be able to deal with a surge of cases as secondary care is extremely crippled. Since COVID-19 prevention and control are the only option available to reduce its grave impact on morbidity and mortality, health partners should support the Yemen FETP to strengthen the health system's response to future epidemics. One important lesson learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in the Yemen context and applicable to developing and war-torn countries, is that access to outside experts becomes limited, therefore, it is crucial to invest in building national expertise to provide timely, cost-effective, and sustainable services that are culturally appropriate. It is also essential to build such expertise at the governorate and district levels, as they are normally the first respondents, and to provide them with the necessary tools for immediate response in order to overcome the disastrous delays.

Evaluation of Blood Transfusion Services in Public and Private Blood Bank Centers, Sana'a Capital, Yemen.

The aim of this study was to evaluate blood transfusion services (BTS) at the main blood banks (BBs) of the Sana'a Capital. The 4 main BBs at Sana'a Capital were evaluated according to the safe World Health Organization BTS standards. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected using semi-structured questionnaires covering 6 components: activities, quality assurance system (QAS) and training, donation, grouping and compatibility testing, components, and screening for transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs). An overall mean percent score for BTS was calculated where <60% is considered unsatisfactory, 60% to 79.9% satisfactory, and ≥80% highly satisfactory. The 4 BBs screen for HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C and perform all functions except therapeutic transfusion. While 75% of the staff in BBs had received training in biosafety and half of the staff had received training in Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), no QAS in place at any of the 4 BBs. The 4 BBs depended on 71% of their transfusions on family donors. Two BBs do not perform reverse grouping and do not keep patient/donor samples for the required minimum 5 days. Only one BB achieved an overall high satisfactory score and one achieved a satisfactory score. Findings highlight the increasing challenges facing BTS in Sana'a Capital especially the lack of therapeutic transfusion, poor QAS, and predominant dependence on the family donors. Therefore, there is a need to develop and train staff on QAS and to increase awareness among public on importance of voluntary donation. A wider scale evaluation of BTS in Sana'a is recommended.