RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of desktop 3D printers when fabricating stents for guided endodontics. METHODS: A stent was designed using planning software for guided endodontic access on a typodont model. Four different 3D printers were used to fabricate an identical stent, one per printer. Each stent was then used to gain access to the artificial endodontic canal on a typodont tooth and was repeated 10 times per stent by the same operator. Each of the accessed typodont teeth were scanned by a reference scanner and then imported into the inspection software. Inspection software used a best-fit alignment to automatically calculate absolute deviation at the base and tip of the bur. RESULTS: The mean distances between the planned and actual positions of the bur were low, ranging from 0.31 to 0.68 mm. Statistically significant differences were found among the 4 groups (F3,36 = 10.67, P < .05). Post hoc comparison revealed that Group Form2 significantly varied from Groups Form3 and Carbon (P < .05 and P < .05, respectively). Group Form3 obtained the most accurate and most precise axial deviations both coronally and apically. CONCLUSIONS: All of the printers tested produced stents for guided access that allowed for a high level of accuracy in obtaining access to the artificial endodontic canal, which would justify the trial of cost-effective 3D printers for guided endodontic access and necessitates further clinical research on teeth with pulp canal obliteration.
