Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Obes Surg ; 33(2): 492-497, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36689143

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Obesity has become a global health concern, associated with decreased quality of life and life expectancy. Although bariatric surgery has many benefits (e.g., substantial and durable weight loss, amelioration of comorbidities, and improvement in functionality), its patient attrition rate is relatively high. Therefore, we aim to assess the causes of withdrawal from our program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We interviewed patients who dropped out of our bariatric surgery program between January 2016 and December 2021. A total of 1999 patients were eligible for bariatric surgery during this period, and 255 patients withdrew from the program. We interviewed patients over the phone to find out the reason for withdrawal. We divided participants into two groups: dropouts before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Several options explaining the reason for leaving the program were presented to the patients to choose from. RESULTS: The number of patients who withdrew from the program before and during the COVID-19 pandemic was 135 (8.9%) and 120 (25.2%), respectively. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, most patients (49.1%) stated that the long waiting time was the cause of withdrawal. Even though during the COVID-19 pandemic, the main causes of attrition were the fear of contracting the disease and COVID-19 infection; the most common reason unrelated to COVID-19 was still the long preoperative preparation. CONCLUSION: Long waiting time was the most common cause of patient attrition before bariatric surgery. To reduce the attrition rate, more studies should be conducted to find an optimized waiting time before bariatric surgery.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , COVID-19 , Obesidade Mórbida , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Pandemias
2.
Adv Clin Exp Med ; 28(2): 151-157, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30411549

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aprotinin is a nonspecific serine protease inhibitor, which can inhibit plasminogen-plasmin system and matrix metalloproteinases. Aprotinin has been investigated as an antitumor agent. However, its antineoplastic effects on breast cancer (BC) have not been investigated yet. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the inhibitory effects of aprotinin on human BC cell lines. We assessed the effects of aprotinin on local invasion and survival of human BC cell lines MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3 and MCF-7 in vitro. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CHEMICON cell invasion assay kit was used to assess local invasion, and (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) tetrazolium reduction (MTT) assay was used to determine the antiproliferative activity of aprotinin. Human dermal fibroblast (HDF-1) cell line was used as control normal cells. RESULTS: Cancer cell lines showed more invasion characteristics compared to HDF-1. Aprotinin significantly decreased the invasiveness of MDA-MB-231 in concentrations of 1 trypsin inhibitor unit (TIU)/mL, 1.3 TIU/mL and 1.7 TIU/mL in comparison with the untreated group (analysis of variance (ANOVA) p < 0.001). Treatment of SK-BR-3 with 1.3 TIU/mL aprotinin caused no significant reduction in invasiveness (p = 0.06). Treatment with different concentrations of aprotinin significantly decreased the surviving fraction and inhibited the growth of all cell lines tested in this study (analysis of variance (ANOVA) p < 0.001). Compared to cancer cell lines, normal HDF-1 cell line showed less sensitivity to antiproliferative effects of aprotinin, both in low and high doses. CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin significantly inhibited the growth of human breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3 and MCF-7, and normal fibroblast cell line HDF-1. The growth inhibitory effect was more dominant in cancer cell lines. Inhibition of local invasion by aprotinin was significant only in the case of MDA-MB-231. Future molecular studies could shed further lights on mechanisms underlying antineoplastic effects of aprotinin and its potential therapeutic effects.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Aprotinina/farmacologia , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Inibidores de Serina Proteinase/farmacologia , Linhagem Celular , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Proliferação de Células , Humanos , Invasividade Neoplásica
3.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol ; 8(1): e209, 2017 Jan 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28055030

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate prognostic effects of plasma levels of ghrelin before and after gastrectomy in gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: We followed 81 GC patients up to 3 years in this study. They were candidates for curative gastrectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Plasma levels of total and active ghrelins before and after the operation were assessed. Association of plasma levels of ghrelin with survival were assessed and adjusted for other potential prognostic factors using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Both total and active ghrelins dropped after gastrectomy (P<0.001 for both). Multiple Cox models revealed worse survival for patients with postoperative total ghrelins below median (hazards ratio (HR)=2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-5.41) or 25th percentile (HR=4.29, 95% CI: 1.48-12.44) compared with patients with higher ghrelin levels. In case of preoperative total ghrelin, patients with either second or third quartiles of plasma ghrelin showed worse survival compared with patients with the lowest quartile (HR=2.67, 95% CI: 1.11-6.38 for second quartile, and HR=2.32, 95% CI: 1.01-5.35 for third quartile vs. the lowest quartile). However, there was no difference between patients with the highest and lowest quartiles (HR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.22-2.73). Similar pattern was observed for preoperative active ghrelin (HR=4.92, 95% CI: 1.80-13.54 for second quartile, and HR=2.87, 95% CI: 1.11-7.38 for third quartile vs. the lowest quartile). Advanced TNM stage (HR=4.88, 95% CI: 1.10-21.77), cachexia (HR=2.99, 95% CI: 1.35-6.63), and receiving no neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR=2.02, 95% CI: 1.04-3.92) were other poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative and postoperative plasma levels of ghrelin could predict survival of GC patients with different patterns. This prognostic effect was independent of stage and cachexia. Measurement of plasma ghrelin in GC patients could complement conventional staging for more precise risk-stratification of the patients. Extrinsic admirations of ghrelin after total gastrectomy has potentials to improve survival of GC patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...