Computed Tomography Scan Versus Saline Load Test in the Detection of Traumatic Arthrotomies of the Ankle: A Cadaveric Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity and ability of computed tomography (CT) scan for diagnosing traumatic ankle arthrotomies compared with that of the saline load test (SLT). METHODS: Eleven cadaveric ankles were included in this study. Before intervention, a CT scan was obtained to confirm the absence of intra-articular air. Arthrotomies were created at the anterolateral, posterolateral, anteromedial, and posteromedial aspects of the ankle under fluoroscopic visualization. A postarthrotomy and postrange of motion CT scan was obtained to evaluate for the presence of intra-articular air. Each ankle then underwent a SLT with 60 mL of saline, where volumes provoking extravasation were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 11 included ankles, intra-articular air was detected in all 11 ankles by CT scan. All 11 ankles also demonstrated extravasation of saline through the arthrotomy site during SLT. Thus, the sensitivity for both CT scan and SLT for detecting ankle traumatic arthrotomy was 100%. The mean volume of saline needed for extravasation was 7.7 mL, with a range of 3-22 mL and a SD of 5.4. CONCLUSIONS: Given that CT scan was equally as sensitive to the SLT, this study presents good evidence that CT scan may be used for the detection of ankle traumatic arthrotomies.

Computed Tomography Scan Versus Saline Load Test for Detection of Traumatic Shoulder Arthrotomy: A Cadaveric Study.

OBJECTIVES: Traumatic shoulder arthrotomy (TSA) is a rare injury that is commonly detected through saline load test (SLT). There are no studies that have studied the ability of computed tomography (CT) scan to detect a TSA. The purpose of this study is to determine the ability of CT scan to detect a TSA and compare it with the SLT. METHODS: Twelve cadaveric shoulders were included in the study. Before intervention, a CT scan was conducted to determine presence of intra-articular air. After confirmation that no air was present, an arthrotomy was made at the anterior or posterior portal site. A CT was obtained postarthrotomy to evaluate for intra-articular air. Each shoulder then underwent an SLT to assess the sensitivity of SLT and the volume needed for extravasation. RESULTS: Twelve shoulders were included after a pre-intervention CT scan. Six shoulders received an arthrotomy through the anterior portal and six shoulders received an arthrotomy through the posterior portal. After the arthrotomy, air was visualized on CT scan in 11 of the 12 shoulders (92%). All 12 shoulders demonstrated extravasation during SLT. The mean volume of saline needed for extravasation was 29 mL with an SD of 10 and range of 18-50 mL. CONCLUSIONS: CT scan is a sensitive modality (sensitivity of 92%) for detection of TSA. In comparison, SLT is more sensitive (sensitivity of 100%) and outperforms CT scan for the diagnosis of TSA in a cadaveric model. Further research is needed to solidify the role that CT imaging has in the diagnosis of TSAs.

A 7-year perspective on femoral neck fracture management in New York State-Do Level 1 trauma centers provide better care?

INTRODUCTION: Patients with femoral neck fractures are at a substantial risk for medical complications and all-cause mortality. Given this trend, our study aims to evaluate postoperative outcomes and the economic profile associated with femoral neck fractures managed at level-1 (L1TC) and non-level-1-trauma centers (nL1TC). METHODS: The SPARCS database was queried for all geriatric patients sustaining atraumatic femoral neck fractures within New York State between 2011 and 2017. Patients were then divided into two cohorts depending on the treating facility's trauma center designation: L1TC versus nL1TC. Patient samples were evaluated for trends and relationships using descriptive analysis, Student's t-tests, and Chi-squared. Multivariable linear-regressions were utilized to assess the effect of trauma center designation and potential confounders on patient mortality and inpatient healthcare expenses. RESULTS: In total, 44,085 femoral neck fractures operatively managed at 161 medical centers throughout New York during a 7-year period. 4,974 fractures were managed at L1TC while 39,111 were treated at nL1TC. Following multivariate regression analysis, management at L1TC was the most significant cost driver, resulting in an average increased cost of $6,330.74 per fracture. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that femoral neck fractures treated at L1TC have more comorbidities, higher in-hospital mortality, longer LOS, and greater hospital costs.

Perioperative management of leg-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty: a review.

Leg-length discrepancy (LLD) presents a significant management challenge to orthopedic surgeons and remains a leading cause of patient dissatisfaction and litigation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Over or under-lengthening of the operative extremity has been shown to have inferior outcomes, such as dislocation, exacerbation of back pain and sciatica, and general dissatisfaction postoperatively. The management of LLD in the setting of THA is multifactorial, and must be taken into consideration in the pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative settings. In our review, we aim to summarize the best available practices and techniques for minimizing LLD through each of these phases of care. Pre-operatively, we provide an overview of the appropriate radiographic studies to be obtained and their interpretation, as well as considerations to be made when templating. Intra-operatively, we discuss several techniques for the assessment of limb length in real time, and post-operatively, we discuss both operative and non-operative management of LLD. By providing a summary of the best available practices and strategies for mitigating the impact of a perceived LLD in the setting of THA, we hope to maximize the potential for an excellent surgical and clinical outcome.

Evolving Patient Perception of Limb Length Discrepancy Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Limb length discrepancy (LLD) is a known complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA), leading to decreased patient function and satisfaction. It remains unknown how a patient's perception of LLD evolves over time. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between measured and perceived LLD, and to assess whether perceived LLD resolved with time in most patients. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed radiographs of 140 consecutive patients undergoing primary THA by a single surgeon via a direct anterior approach, calculating postoperative change in limb length (ΔL). Patient perceptions of LLD were recorded at standard postoperative visit intervals. A P-value of .05 was used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Of 130 patients (mean ΔL = +7.9 mm), 22 patients endorsed perceived postoperative LLD and the remainder were asymptomatic (mean ΔL +11.1 mm vs +7.3 mm, P = .03). Seventeen patients reported mild symptoms and 5 reported severe symptoms (mean ΔL +10.2 mm vs +13.8 mm, P = .4). After 1 year, 45% (10) patients reported complete resolution of perceived LLD (mean follow-up 364 days), 18% (4) reported notable improvement, and 36% (8) reported no improvement. Four excluded patients endorsed perceived LLD (2 mild, 2 severe), which resolved after contralateral THA. CONCLUSION: This study noted a correlation between increasing postoperative ΔL and perceived LLD. A majority of patients (63%) experienced either improvement or full resolution of symptoms during the follow-up period. This data may have a role in reassuring the orthopedic surgeon and the patient regarding the natural course of postoperative LLD. Further investigation is needed to help identify risk factors for persistent LLD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (Prognostic).