RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Immunization against vaccine-preventable diseases prior to pregnancy is an important measure of primary prevention both for the mother and the unborn child. We analyzed immunity rates against measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, and pertussis in pregnant employees in Germany prior to significant changes in legal conditions in 2020, to provide a basis of comparison for future research. METHODS: We analyzed occupational-medical routine data in three collectives of pregnant women with an occupational risk of infection in the years 2018 and 2019: 1: hospital staff with regular access to an in-house company physician (n = 148); 2: employees in childcare with regular access to external occupational-health services (n = 139); 3: teachers with no regular access to occupational healthcare (n = 285). Immune status was assessed by a physician based on vaccination certificates, laboratory results, and medical documentation on prior infections. We compared immunity rates against measles, rubella, varicella, and pertussis as well as full immunity against all targeted vaccine-preventable diseases. RESULTS: Altogether, n = 572 pregnant women were included in our study. Of these women, 96.5 % were immune to rubella, 95.8 % to varicella, 88.3 % to measles, 82.7 % to mumps, and 67.8 % to pertussis. Only 56.2 % of the women had full immunity against all targeted vaccine-preventable diseases. Collective 1 showed the highest immunity rates against measles and pertussis as well as the highest rate of full immunity against all targeted vaccine-preventable diseases. The immunity rates against rubella and varicella did not differ significantly between the collectives. With the exception of rubella, the lowest immunity rates during pregnancy were found in Collective 3. CONCLUSION: We found pregnancy-relevant immunity gaps in all our study groups with significant differences between the collectives. Considering the potentially devastating consequences of infections during pregnancy, all medical professionals and health-policy makers should be involved in an increased effort to improve vaccination rates prior to pregnancy.
RESUMO
AIM OF THE STUDY: The measles protection act and the updated recommendations of the permanent commission of vaccination (STIKO) include the obligatory proof of a double vaccination against measles for employees (born after 1970) in childcare. In addition, the standard and professional recommendations for vaccinations should be respected. A retrolective evaluation of vaccination gaps of employees in institutions for preschool childcare was performed. METHODS: The database of 2018 and 2019 of the B·A·D-Health center Erlangen have 1300 recorded cases of occupational medical consultations in preschool childcare. Double consultations and consultations with insufficient data were excluded. 1016 contacts were analyzed with regard to vaccination gaps of measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, pertussis, hepatitis A+B and early summer meningoencephalitis. The evaluation was primarily based on the employees' vaccination cards. Vaccination gaps were assumed in case of missing, commenced or incomplete vaccination protection. RESULTS: In this cohort of 1016 employees, the vaccination gap for measles increased from 16.2% to 20.6%, when applying the updated STIKO recommendation and the resulting change of definition of complete vaccination protection from measles. Further gaps were 22.7% for mumps, 18.9% for rubella, 2.3% for varicella, 27.8% for pertussis, 61.1% for hepatitis A and 60.5% and tick-borne encephalitis. The age group <30 years showed less vaccination gaps than the age group ≥30 years. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of the health center in Erlangen showed considerable age-dependent vaccination gaps in the cohort of employees of preschool childcare. The measles protection act that makes vaccination against measles mandatory contributes to closing this gap. There is room for counselling as well as for action regarding vaccine-preventable diseases in occupational medicine.
