Disability Improvement Is Associated with Less Brain Atrophy Development in Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is unknown whether deceleration of brain atrophy is associated with disability improvement in patients with MS. Our aim was to investigate whether patients with MS with disability improvement develop less brain atrophy compared with those who progress in disability or remain stable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We followed 980 patients with MS for a mean of 4.8 ± 2.4 years. Subjects were divided into 3 groups: progress in disability (n = 241, 24.6%), disability improvement (n = 101, 10.3%), and stable (n = 638, 65.1%) at follow-up. Disability improvement and progress in disability were defined on the basis of the Expanded Disability Status Scale score change using standardized guidelines. Stable was defined as nonoccurrence of progress in disability or disability improvement. Normalized whole-brain volume was calculated using SIENAX on 3D T1WI, whereas the lateral ventricle was measured using NeuroSTREAM on 2D-T2-FLAIR images. The percentage brain volume change and percentage lateral ventricle volume change were calculated using SIENA and NeuroSTREAM, respectively. Differences among groups were investigated using ANCOVA, adjusted for age at first MR imaging, race, T2 lesion volume, and corresponding baseline structural volume and the Expanded Disability Status Scale. RESULTS: At first MR imaging, there were no differences among progress in disability, disability improvement, and the stable groups in whole-brain volume (P = .71) or lateral ventricle volume (P = .74). During follow-up, patients with disability improvement had the lowest annualized percentage lateral ventricle volume change (1.6% ± 2.7%) followed by patients who were stable (2.1% ± 3.7%) and had progress in disability (4.1% ± 5.5%), respectively (P < .001). The annualized percentage brain volume change values were -0.7% ± 0.7% for disability improvement, -0.8% ± 0.7% for stable, and -1.1% ± 1.1% for progress in disability (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MS who improve in their clinical disability develop less brain atrophy across time compared with those who progress.

Brain Atrophy Is Associated with Disability Progression in Patients with MS followed in a Clinical Routine.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The assessment of brain atrophy in a clinical routine is not performed routinely in multiple sclerosis. Our aim was to determine the feasibility of brain atrophy measurement and its association with disability progression in patients with MS followed in a clinical routine for 5 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1815 subjects, 1514 with MS and 137 with clinically isolated syndrome and 164 healthy individuals, were collected retrospectively. Of 11,794 MR imaging brain scans included in the analysis, 8423 MRIs were performed on a 3T, and 3371 MRIs, on a 1.5T scanner. All patients underwent 3D T1WI and T2-FLAIR examinations at all time points of the study. Whole-brain volume changes were measured by percentage brain volume change/normalized brain volume change using SIENA/SIENAX on 3D T1WI and percentage lateral ventricle volume change using NeuroSTREAM on T2-FLAIR. RESULTS: Percentage brain volume change failed in 36.7% of the subjects; percentage normalized brain volume change, in 19.2%; and percentage lateral ventricle volume change, in 3.3% because of protocol changes, poor scan quality, artifacts, and anatomic variations. Annualized brain volume changes were significantly different between those with MS and healthy individuals for percentage brain volume change (P < .001), percentage normalized brain volume change (P = .002), and percentage lateral ventricle volume change (P = .01). In patients with MS, mixed-effects model analysis showed that disability progression was associated with a 21.9% annualized decrease in percentage brain volume change (P < .001) and normalized brain volume (P = .002) and a 33% increase in lateral ventricle volume (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: All brain volume measures differentiated MS and healthy individuals and were associated with disability progression, but the lateral ventricle volume assessment was the most feasible.