Medical Thoracoscopy and Intrapleural Fibrinolytic Therapy for the Management of Pleural Empyema: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Pleural empyema is associated with relevant morbidity and mortality, and it may be classified, according to evolution and ultrasound, into three stages: stage I (free-flowing effusion), stage II (viscous effusion with the tendency to loculate), and stage III (organizing phase). According to guidelines, antibiotic therapy and pleural drainage are recommended, with surgery being performed when patients fail and/or in case of organized empyema. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to report the efficacy and safety of medical thoracoscopy in patients with pleural empyema stratified by chest ultrasound. METHOD: Observational retrospective cohort study analyzing patients with pleural empyema treated with medical thoracoscopy. Procedure success and mortality were evaluated at 30 days and 90 days after the procedure; complications were also reported. RESULTS: 131 patients were included. Intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy was performed thereafter in the majority of cases. Medical thoracoscopy was considered successful without subsequent intervention in 99 patients (76%); 19 patients (15%) underwent a second procedure (drainage, thoracoscopy, video-assisted thoracic surgery, or thoracotomy); and 6 patients (5%) died of the evolution of empyema. Patients treated in stages I and II showed significantly better post-procedure results compared with patients treated in stage III (100%, 83.3%, and 58.1%, respectively). Thoracoscopy complications were observed in 18 patients and were reversible in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pleural empyema treated in earlier stages (free-flowing or multiloculated effusion) with medical thoracoscopy show significantly better results than patients treated in later stages (organized empyema). This approach is safe, minimally invasive, and efficient in these patients with disease having relevant mortality; however, patient selection remains essential.

Diurnal mouthpiece ventilation and nocturnal non-invasive ventilation versus tracheostomy invasive ventilation in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory disorders are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Current guidelines suggest the provision of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for symptomatic hypoventilation in patients with ALS. Inspite of these results the proportion of ALS patients on tracheostomy invasive ventilation (TIV) is relatively high. METHODS: Thirty-two patients were included in the study: 16 patients were treated with nocturnal NIV associated with diurnal mouthpiece ventilation (MPV) and 16 with TIV .The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate survival in the two groups. Secondary endpoints were to evaluate differences in the two populations in terms of clinical outcomes and quality of life (HRQoL). RESULTS: Cox analysis survival data shows no statically difference in the hazard function of the two groups. The comparison between the two groups showed a significant improvement in the average value of gas indices (paO2, paCO2) in the group treated with TIV in comparison to the group treated with MPV/NIV. Conversely, the evaluation of the questionnaires on HRQoL showed a higher score in patients treated with MPV/NIV compared to those treated with TIV. CONCLUSIONS: Ventilatory treatment with MPV and TIV did not demonstrate significant differences in survival. Patients treated with MPV reported a better HRQoL, although TIV group showed higher ventilatory parameters improvement than MPV group.