Incidence and clinical significance of bacterial and fungal contamination of the preservation solution in liver transplantation.

A perfusion fluid used in the preservation of the grafted liver represents a medium suitable for microorganism growth. In this observational study, a sample of 232 transplanted livers was collected. Perfusion fluid samples were stored for microbiological analysis from harvested donors. Bacteria were isolated in 91 out of 232 samples, post-operative infections related to contaminated perfusion solution occurred in 13 cases. The contamination rate of the preservation medium appears to be high, but postoperative infections occurs rarely. We suggest periodic detection and a protocol in place designed for antibiotic use for transplanted patients exposed to contaminated perfusion solution.

Liver transplantation in recipients over 65 yr old: a single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: The advanced age of the recipient is considered a "relative contraindication" to liver transplantation (LT). However, recently some studies reported a morbidity rate and an overall survival comparable with those of younger patients. Here, we reported the outcome after LT in recipients aged >65 yr. METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2006, 565 LT was performed in 502 recipients in our institution. Of these, 34 were recipients of >65 yr old (aged group). We focused our study comparing: donor age, co-morbidities, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, duration of operation, transfusions and outcome between the two groups (young/aged). RESULTS: For the group aged >65: the mean donor age was 52.5 (range 16-75) yr and the graft weight 1339 g (890-1880 g). Co-morbidity was recorded in 25 (73.5%), coronary artery disease (CAD) in 17 (50%), diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic renal insufficiency in four (11.7%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in three patients (8.8%). Mean MELD score was 14.9 (range 12-29) and ASA score was two in 15 (44.1%); and three in 19 (55.8%) recipients. Mean operation time was four h 45 min, three patients also received combined kidney transplantation. Twenty-five (73.5%) recipients received blood transfusions (mean 3.2). Morbidity was observed in 20 patients (58.8%); of these two had hepatic artery thrombosis requiring re-LT. Overall survival was 80% (40 months of follow-up), in particularly, at 30-d, one yr, three yr was 91%, 84%, 80%, respectively. The only two statistical differences reported (p = 0.02) are: the lower rate of CAD in the younger group of recipients (12%), compared with the aged group (50%) and the subsequently lower mortality rate secondary to cardiac causes in the younger group (1.4%) compared with aged group (8.8%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the recipient age should not be considered an absolute contraindication for LT when the graft/recipient matching is optimal and when an adequate cardiac assessment is performed.

Twenty seven years of experience in pediatric liver transplantation in Strasbourg: focus on the ex situ split techniques.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the well-known controversies about split-liver procedures, since 1979 we have utilized an ex situ instead of an in situ technique because of its feasibility. However, we sought to prove the equality of the results of these two procedures. Herein, we have presented our experience after 27 years' follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 1979 and June 2006, we transplanted 84 livers in 67 pediatric recipients including 37 ex situ split livers implanted into 28 patients. RESULTS: We recorded demographic characteristics, transplantation, and retransplantation indications, age difference between donors and recipients, comorbidities, cold ischemia times, surgical times and complications, graft/recipient body weight ratios, organ recovery times, and overall survivals after 1, 5, and 15 years follow-up. We have herein reported 1, 5, and 15 years of patient versus organ survivals of 88.9.1%, 84.5%, 62.1% versus 78.6%, 74.2%, 57.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We have concluded that an ex situ split liver may be a valid alternative to in situ techniques to achieve good grafts for pediatric transplantation.