Effects of Device Settings and E-Liquid Characteristics on Mouth-Throat Losses of Nicotine Delivered with Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS).

Currently it is not fully understood how the device settings and electronic liquid (e-liquid) composition, including their form of nicotine content, impact mouth and throat losses, and potentially lead to the variations in total nicotine delivery to the human lungs. An in situ size assessment method was developed for real-time measurements at the mouthpiece and outlet of a biorelevant mouth-throat to account for the dynamic nature of the aerosol. The aerosol size, temperature, and delivery through the mouth-throat replica and the exhaled aerosol between the puff intervals were measured at different wattages using various e-liquid compositions. The effects of body temperature and humidity on aerosol size and nicotine delivery were also explored to evaluate the importance of considering realistic in vivo conditions in in vitro measurements. Notably, in vitro tests with body temperature and humidity in mouth-throat model vs room conditions, resulted in larger aerosol size at the end of the throat (Dv50=5.83±0.33 µm vs 3.05±0.15 µm), significantly higher thoracic nicotine delivery (>90% vs 50-85%) potentially due to the lower exhaled amount (<10% vs 15-50%). Besides, higher VG/PG ratios resulted in significantly lower exhaled amount and higher mouth-throat nicotine deposition. One of the main outcomes of the study was finding significantly lower exhaled amount and higher thoracic nicotine delivery with nicotine salt form vs free-base. Considering body temperature and humidity also showed significant enhancement in nicotine delivery, so it is essential to account for biorelevant experimental conditions in benchtop testing.

E-Liquids from Seven European Countries-Warnings Analysis and Freebase Nicotine Content.

Electronic cigarettes are available in a variety of devices with e-liquids also available in many flavors, and nicotine concentrations, albeit less than 20 mg/mL in Europe. Given the dynamics of these products, it is important to evaluate product content, including labeling, nicotine content versus labeled claim, nicotine form, and other aspects that may help policy decisions and align with the Tobacco Product Directive (TPD). Herein, we performed a study on 86 e-liquids from seven European countries (Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and the United Kingdom) with 34 different liquid brands and 57 different flavors. Nicotine content versus labeled claim, labeling, volume, pH, and nicotine form (i.e., freebase nicotine) were evaluated. From all tested products, eight of them from Germany, Poland, and UK (from 3 to 18 mg/mL), met the ±2% criteria. The ±10% criteria was fulfilled by 50 (58.1%) liquids from all countries. Among 71 liquids which contained nicotine, (one e-liquid labeled as 6 mg/mL had no nicotine level quantified), the amount of freebase nicotine differed from 0 to 97.8%, with a mean value 56.5 ± 35.7. None of the tested liquids had nicotine salt listed in the ingredients. Therefore, a low level of freebase nicotine in some liquids was most likely achieved by added flavorings. All tested liquids presented in this study met the basic requirements of the TPD. There were differences in the scope of information about harmfulness, type of warnings on packaging, attaching leaflets, placing graphic symbols, and discrepancies between the declared and quantified nicotine concentrations.

Potential factors affecting free base nicotine yield in electronic cigarette aerosols.

BACKGROUND: The free base and protonated nicotine forms in e-cigarette aerosol have shown different absorption profiles in users. Therefore, it is also important to identify the factors which can affect the ratio of these nicotine forms in the aerosol. Such factors may include nicotine concentrations, flavors, PG:VG ratios, types of nicotine chemical compounds and e-cigarette battery power outputs. The current study attempts to identify such factors using a controlled experiment. RESEARCH DESIGNS AND METHODS: The aerosol was generated using validated aerosol generating model. Various factors were tested for their effect on nicotine forms. Additionally, a degradation study of one of the nicotine compounds, nicotine salicylate, was also carried out using mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The free base nicotine in the aerosol was found to be affected by flavors, battery power output, nicotine compound type and PG:VG ratios. Based on the preliminary mass spectrometry data, degradation of nicotine salicylate was found to be one of the significant factors affecting free base nicotine in aerosol. CONCLUSIONS: Potential factors affecting free base nicotine in e-cigarette aerosol have been identified in this study. These findings would help in understanding the nicotine delivery better and assist for better regulations.

Nicotine forms: why and how do they matter in nicotine delivery from electronic cigarettes?

INTRODUCTION: Unregulated e-cigarette devices and their nicotine content have amplified the potential of e-cigarettes as addictive agents. Several e-cigarette-related parameters have been identified altering nicotine's absorption profile, so their potential effects on addiction should be considered. Of these factors, nicotine forms (protonated and free base) play a significant role in the addiction potential yet their impact on nicotine's absorption has been studied with limited research. AREAS COVERED: Current review aims to emphasize on the possible mechanism behind different absorption profiles of nicotine forms considering their physical states (droplet and vapor phase) and the aerosol particle size, their analysis in e-cigarette research and the regulatory attention warranted by them to combat nicotine addiction in the population due to e-cigarettes. EXPERT OPINION: The protonated form of nicotine is being correlated with the smooth sensory effects and high nicotine absorption as compared to free base nicotine. With the introduction of nicotine salts, which yield mostly the protonated form, the youth popularity of e-cigarettes has spiked exponentially. While it is important to control nicotine levels in e-cigarette products, attention should also be given to the nicotine forms present in these products in order to address nicotine addiction in the population.

An Analytical Perspective on Determination of Free Base Nicotine in E-Liquids.

In electronic cigarette users, nicotine delivery to lungs depends on various factors. One of the important factors is e-liquid nicotine concentration. Nicotine concentration in e-liquids ranges from 0 to >50 mg/mL. Furthermore, nicotine exists in protonated and unprotonated ("free base") forms. The two forms are believed to affect the nicotine absorption in body. Therefore, in addition to total nicotine concentration, e-liquids should be characterized for their free base nicotine yield. Two approaches are being used for the determination of free base nicotine in e-liquids. The first is applying a dilution to e-liquids followed by two methods: Henderson-Hasselbalch theory application or a Liquid-Liquid Extraction. The second is the without-dilution approach followed by 1H NMR method. Here, we carried out controlled experiments using five e-liquids of different flavors using these two approaches. In the dilution approach, the Henderson-Hasselbalch method was tested using potentiometric titration. The accuracy was found to be >98% for all five e-liquid samples (n = 3). A Liquid-Liquid Extraction was carried out using toluene or hexane as extraction solvent. The Liquid-Liquid Extraction technique was found to be limited by solvent interactions with flavors. Solvent extractions resulted in flavor dependent inaccuracies in free base nicotine determination (5 to 277% of calculated values). The without-dilution approach was carried out using 1H NMR as described by Duell et al. This approach is proposed to offer an independent and alternative scale. None of the methods have established a strong correlation between pre- and postvaporization free base nicotine yield. Here we present comparative results of two approaches using analytical techniques. Such a comparison would be helpful in establishing a standardized method for free base nicotine determination of e-liquids.

Historical Perspective of Proactive and Reactive Regulations of E-cigarettes to Combat Nicotine Addiction.

Cigarettes and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are major sources of exposure to nicotine, an addictive chemical. Although these products are being regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the Tobacco Control Act, specifications about the nicotine content in these products have not been established yet. In e-cigarettes, nicotine concentration ranges from 0 to > 50mg/mL, and the recent e-cigarette devices provide control to change nicotine flux for higher nicotine delivery. Due to the lack of robust regulations in manufacturing, distribution and marketing, e-cigarettes have already infiltrated the market with youth appealing flavors and devices. As a result, the country is facing a youth epidemic of e-cigarette use. The unregulated nicotine levels in both cigarettes and e-cigarettes can lead to repeated and overexposure of nicotine to youth which can lead to the addiction and detrimental effects on their cognitive functions. Over the past decade, the corrective measures being taken by the FDA for cigarette and e-cigarette regulations also should focus on nicotine exposure levels. Before it is too late to prevent youth from lifetime addiction to nicotine, it is important to address the issues of nicotine concentration, nicotine flux and the e-cigarette device regulations while offering adults with smoking disorder less harmful alternatives to cigarettes.

A Standardized Approach to Quantitative Analysis of Nicotine in e-Liquids Based on Peak Purity Criteria Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography.

The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is a growing trend in population. E-cigarettes are evolving at a rapid rate with variety of battery powered devices and combustible nicotine refills such as e-liquids. In contrast to conventional cigarettes which are studied well for their toxicity and health effects, long-term clinical data on e-cigarettes are not available yet. Therefore, safety of e-cigarettes is still a major concern. Although the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently started regulating e-cigarette products, no limits on nicotine and other ingredients in such products have been proposed. Considering the regulatory requirements, it is critical that reliable and standardized analytical methods for analyzing nicotine and other ingredients in e-cigarette products such as e-liquids are available. Here, we are reporting a fully validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method based on nicotine peak purity for accurately quantifying nicotine in various e-liquids. The method has been validated as per ICH Q2(R1) and USP <1225> guidelines. The method is specific, precise, accurate, and linear to analyze nicotine in e-liquids with 1 to >50 mg/mL of nicotine. Additionally, the method has been proven robust and flexible for parameters such as change in flow rate, column oven temperature, and organic phase composition, which proves applicability of the method over wide variety of e-liquids in market.