Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 41(1): 11-7, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22184624

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and reproducibility of angular and linear measurements of conventional and digital cephalometric methods. METHODS: A total of 13 landmarks and 16 skeletal and dental parameters were defined and measured on pre-treatment cephalometric radiographs of 30 patients. The conventional and digital tracings and measurements were performed twice by the same examiner with a 6 week interval between measurements. The reliability within the method was determined using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r²). The reproducibility between methods was calculated by paired t-test. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: All measurements for each method were above 0.90 r² (strong correlation) except maxillary length, which had a correlation of 0.82 for conventional tracing. Significant differences between the two methods were observed in most angular and linear measurements except for ANB angle (p = 0.5), angle of convexity (p = 0.09), anterior cranial base (p = 0.3) and the lower anterior facial height (p = 0.6). CONCLUSION: In general, both methods of conventional and digital cephalometric analysis are highly reliable. Although the reproducibility of the two methods showed some statistically significant differences, most differences were not clinically significant.


Assuntos
Cefalometria/normas , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/normas , Pontos de Referência Anatômicos/anatomia & histologia , Cefalometria/métodos , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Mandíbula/anatomia & histologia , Maxila/anatomia & histologia , Osso Nasal/anatomia & histologia , Palato/anatomia & histologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sela Túrcica/anatomia & histologia , Base do Crânio/anatomia & histologia , Dimensão Vertical
2.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 13(1): 1-10, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20078789

RESUMO

Currently, the use of oral and systemic forms of bisphosphonates is increasing dramatically in a large group of patients either in the form of anti-osteoporosis medications or as a part of a chemotherapeutic regimen for several malignant diseases. As adult orthodontic treatment has become more widely accepted in most orthodontic practices, orthodontists must be aware of the risks, benefits, and effects of bisphosphonates use on the patient's general health status, as well as on their orthodontic treatment outcomes. This review aims to discuss the use of bisphosphonates, the complications associated with their use, and their impact on orthodontic treatment.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Remodelação Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Difosfonatos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Maxilomandibulares/etiologia , Osteonecrose/etiologia , Técnicas de Movimentação Dentária , Processo Alveolar/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/química , Contraindicações , Análise do Estresse Dentário , Difosfonatos/química , Meia-Vida , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais , Osteoclastos/efeitos dos fármacos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...