Impulse control disorders and use of dopamine agonists in early onset Parkinson's disease.

Introduction: Impulse control disorders (ICDs) are defined as excessive and repetitive behaviors that may affect Parkinson's disease (PD) patients exposed to dopamine agonists. Current data on ICDs in patients with early-onset Parkinson's disease (EOPD) is lacking. In this study we aim to assess the frequency of use of dopamine agonists, the prevalence of ICDs, and to explore potential factors associated with their development in patients with EOPD. Methods: We used the Mayo Clinic Data Explorer system to investigate a population-based cohort of EOPD patients between 1990 and 2022 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. We used ICD coding for parkinsonism; then, we reviewed all the clinical records and included only those patients with a clinical diagnosis of PD with symptoms onset at or before the age of 50, and who developed ICDs after using therapeutic doses of dopamine agonists. Results: A total of 831 (513 males and 318 females) patients with EOPD were included with a median age at symptom onset of 42 years of age (CI: 37-46). Dopamine agonists were used in 49.7% of all patients; of these, only 14.5% developed symptoms of one or more ICDs. Hypersexuality was the most commonly observed ICD (38.3%), and the only one having a statistically significant male predominance (p = 0.011). Conclusion: ICDs are common in EOPD, particularly when associated with the use of dopamine agonists.

Endometrial cancer with positive sentinel lymph nodes: pathologic characteristics of metastases as predictors of extent of lymphatic dissemination and prognosis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess predictors of extensive lymph node dissemination and non-vaginal recurrence in patients with endometrial cancer with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). METHODS: Patients with endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgery with SLN mapping and had at least one positive node between October 2013 and May 2019 were included. Positive SLNs were reviewed, and cases were classified according to the location of the metastasis (extracapsular vs intracapsular), and the size of the largest SLN metastasis (isolated tumor cells, micrometastasis, macrometastasis). Associations were assessed based on fitting logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients met the inclusion criteria: including 36 (34.9%) with isolated tumor cells, 27 (26.2%) with micrometastasis, and 40 (38.8%) with macrometastasis. Notably, 71.4% of patients exhibiting extracapsular SLN metastases had multiple positive SLNs (p=0.008). Extracapsular invasion (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 5.81, 95% CI 1.4 to 23.6) and age (aOR=1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.0) emerged as independent predictors of multiple positive SLNs. Among the 38 patients who underwent a backup pelvic lymphadenectomy, 18 (47.4%) presented with positive pelvic non-SLNs, a phenomenon more prevalent in patients with macrometastasis (p=0.004).Independent predictors of non-vaginal recurrence included SLN macrometastasis (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 3.3, 95% CI 1.3 to 8.3), non-endometrioid histology (aHR=3.7, 95% CI 1.5 to 9.3), and cervical stromal invasion (aHR=5.5, 95% CI 2.0 to 14.9). Among the 34 patients with isolated tumor cells and endometrioid histology, 3 (9%) experienced a recurrence, all of whom had not received any adjuvant chemotherapy or external beam radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Patients with positive SLN macrometastasis are independently associated with extensive lymphatic dissemination and distant recurrences. The risk of multiple positive SLNs increases with the extracapsular location of the SLN metastasis and with age. Independent uterine pathologic predictors of non-vaginal recurrence are non-endometrioid histology and cervical stromal invasion.

Prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes in low risk endometrial cancer: results from an international multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVE: The prognostic significance of isolated tumor cells (≤0.2 mm) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) of endometrial cancer patients is still unclear. Our aim was to assess the prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in patients with low risk endometrial cancer who underwent SLN biopsy and did not receive adjuvant therapy. Outcomes were compared with node negative patients. METHODS: Patients with SLNs-isolated tumor cells between 2013 and 2019 were identified from 15 centers worldwide, while SLN negative patients were identified from Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between 2013 and 2018. Only low risk patients (stage IA, endometrioid histology, grade 1 or 2) who did not receive any adjuvant therapy were included. Primary outcomes were recurrence free, non-vaginal recurrence free, and overall survival, evaluated with Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: 494 patients (42 isolated tumor cells and 452 node negative) were included. There were 21 (4.3%) recurrences (5 SLNs-isolated tumor cells, 16 node negative); recurrence was vaginal in six patients (1 isolated tumor cells, 5 node negative), and non-vaginal in 15 (4 isolated tumor cells, 11 node negative). Median follow-up among those without recurrence was 2.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1.1-3.0) and 2.6 years (IQR 0.6-4.2) in the SLN-isolated tumor cell and node negative patients, respectively. The presence of SLNs-isolated tumor cells, lymphovascular space invasion, and International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) grade 2 were significant risk factors for recurrence on univariate analysis. SLN-isolated tumor cell patients had worse recurrence free survival (p<0.01) and non-vaginal recurrence free survival (p<0.01) compared with node negative patients. Similar results were observed in the subgroup of patients without lymphovascular space invasion (n=480). There was no difference in overall survival between the two cohorts in the full sample and the subset excluding patients with lymphovascular space invasion. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SLNs-isolated tumor cells and low risk profile, without adjuvant therapy, had a significantly worse recurrence free survival compared with node negative patients with similar risk factors, after adjusting for grade and excluding patients with lymphovascular space invasion. However, the presence of SLNs-isolated tumor cells was not associated with worse overall survival.

Diagnosis and surgical management of pericardial constriction after cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Previous cardiac surgery is an increasingly common etiology of constrictive pericarditis, but there is a paucity of data on clinical presentation and outcome of surgical treatment. METHODS: We reviewed data of 263 patients who underwent pericardiectomy for postoperative constriction from January 1, 1993, through July 1, 2017. Outcomes of interest were early and late mortality, as well as features of clinical presentation. RESULTS: Median patient age was 64 (56-72) years, and the median interval between previous operation and pericardiectomy was 2.7 years (range, 0-54 years). Previous operations included coronary artery bypass grafting in 114 (43%), valve surgery in 85 (32%), combined coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery in 33 (13%), and other procedures in 31 (12%). Common presentations were symptoms of right heart failure in 221 (84%) or dyspnea in 42 (16%). Moderate-to-severe tricuspid valve regurgitation was present in 108 (41%) patients. There were 14 (5.5%) deaths within 30 days postoperatively, and survival at 5 and 10 years postoperatively was 61% and 44%. On multivariate analysis, older age (P = .013), diabetes (P = .019), and nonelective pericardiectomy within 2 years of cardiac surgery (P < .001) were associated with decreased long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Pericardial constriction after cardiac surgery can present at any interval postoperatively. Symptoms and signs of right heart failure in patients with previous cardiac surgery should alert physicians to the possibility of pericardial constriction followed by a correct diagnosis. Pericardiectomy performed urgently following cardiac operation has poor long-term outcomes.

Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Surgery in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. DATA SOURCES: A cohort study of all patients who underwent surgery for high-risk endometrial cancer between 1999 and 2016 at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) and a literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus of all published studies until December 2020. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: The systematic review identified 2,332 patients (14 studies, all retrospective except a subanalysis of a randomized comparison) and the cohort study identified 542 additional patients. Articles were included if reporting original data on overall survival and disease-free survival among patients with high-risk endometrial cancer, defined as International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, mixed histology, or uterine carcinosarcoma. Studies that did not report at least one of the main outcomes, those in which one surgical technique (robotic or laparoscopic surgery) was missing in the comparison analysis with open surgery, and case reports were excluded. Additional data were extracted from a retrospective cohort of patients from Mayo. A random-effect model was used for meta-analysis. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO. Literature search and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers, as well as quality assessment using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Meta-analysis showed that disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer who underwent minimally invasive surgery were not statistically different from those of patients who underwent open abdominal surgery (relative risk [RR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.82-1.05, I2 20%, P=.23; and RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77-1.11, I2 31%, P=.12, respectively). Subgroup analysis by stage (early vs advanced) did not identify a difference between surgical approaches. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgery and open surgery had similar disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021275535.

Oncologic outcomes of endometrial cancer in patients with low-volume metastasis in the sentinel lymph nodes: An international multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess oncologic outcomes in endometrial cancer patients with low-volume metastasis (LVM) in the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). METHODS: Patients with endometrial cancer and SLN-LVM (≤2 mm) from December 3, 2009, to December 31, 2018, were retrospectively identified from 22 centers worldwide. Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV, adnexal involvement, or unknown adjuvant therapy (ATx) were excluded. RESULTS: Of 247 patients included, 132 had isolated tumor cell (ITC) and 115 had micrometastasis (MM). Overall 4-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 77.6% (95% CI, 70.2%-85.9%); median follow-up for patients without recurrence was 29.6 (interquartile range, 19.2-41.5) months. At multivariate analysis, Non-endometrioid (NE) (HR, 5.00; 95% CI, 2.50-9.99; P < .001), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (HR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.45-7.31; P = .004), and uterine serosal invasion (USI) (HR, 3.70; 95% CI, 1.44-9.54; P = .007) were independent predictors of recurrence. Among 47 endometrioid ITC patients without ATx, 4-year RFS was 82.6% (95% CI, 70.1%-97.2). Considering 18 ITC patients with endometrioid grade 1 disease, without LVSI, USI, or ATx, only 1 had recurrence (median follow-up, 24.8 months). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SLN-LVM, NE, LVSI, and USI were independent risk factors for recurrence. Patients with any risk factor had poor prognosis, even when receiving ATx. Patients with ITC and grade 1 endometrioid disease (no LVSI/USI) had favorable prognosis, even without ATx. Further analysis (with more patients and longer follow-up) is needed to assess whether ATx can be withheld in this low-risk subgroup.

An unusual presentation of dyspnea following septal ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Residual or recurrent symptoms after septal reduction therapy are most often related to inadequate relief of left ventricular outflow gradients. We recently encountered a 71-year-old woman with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and prior alcohol septal ablation who had a unique constellation of findings causing her symptoms. She was found to have four potential causes for her symptoms, residual midventricular obstruction, apical distribution of hypertrophy reducing end-diastolic volume, constrictive pericarditis, and marked arterial stiffness, as reflected by aortic atherosclerosis. She underwent complete pericardiectomy, transaortic septal myectomy, transapical myectomy, and replacement of a heavily calcified ascending aorta.

Sentinel Lymph Nodes and Precision Surgery in Gynecologic Cancer.

Besides histologic features, the presence of nodal metastasis is the most crucial prognostic factor for recurrence and survival for patients with gynecologic cancer. Conventionally, lymphadenectomy has been performed routinely to assess lymphatic metastasis. However, lymphadenectomy may be unnecessary in early-stage gynecologic cancer, because the percentage of patients with lymph node involvement is very low. The recent use of sentinel lymph node mapping has provided high feasibility, safety, and accuracy in the assessment of nodal metastasis. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines have incorporated the sentinel lymph node for nodal evaluation in vulvar, endometrial, and cervical cancers.