Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hernia ; 20(4): 527-30, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26886012

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There are a group of patients in which umbilical or epigastric hernias co-exist with rectus divarication. These patients have weak abdominal musculature and are likely to pose a higher risk of recurrence following umbilical hernia repair. We would like to describe a technique for open repair of small (<4 cm) midline hernias in patients with co-existing rectus divarication using self-adhesive synthetic mesh. The use of a self-adhesive mesh avoids the need for suture fixation of the mesh in the superior portion of the abdomen, allowing for a smaller skin incision. RESULTS: In 173 patients, preperitoneal self-fixating mesh has been used for the repair of midline hernias <4 cm in diameter. In 58 of these patients, the mesh was extended superiorly to reinforce a concurrent divarication. DISCUSSION: The described technique offers a simple option for open repair of small midline hernias in patients with co-existing rectus divarication, to decrease the risk of upper midline recurrence in an at-risk patient group. This initial case series is able to demonstrate a suitably low rate of recurrence and complications.


Assuntos
Hérnia Umbilical/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Síndrome do Abdome em Ameixa Seca/cirurgia , Telas Cirúrgicas , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Humanos , Reto do Abdome/cirurgia
2.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2014(5)2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24876518

RESUMO

Primary mesenteric gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are rare tumours and can be included as a differential for an expanding intraabdominal mass. We present the case, in our institution, of a 72-year-old male who presented with non-specific symptoms and was diagnosed with a primary mesenteric GIST following resection. We report his follow-up and discuss the current theories as to the origins of these rare tumours and current treatment modalities.

3.
HPB (Oxford) ; 10(1): 38-42, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18695757

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is a safe alternative to conventional open distal pancreatectomy, with advantages that include smaller incisions, less pain, and shorter postoperative recovery. Despite these apparent advantages, however, uptake of the procedure has been slow, with only a handful of series published. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All LDPs performed in Brisbane, Australia, over a 10-year period (May 1996 to June 2006) were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Forty-six consecutive LDPs were performed. A variety of lesions were resected, including nine cancers. Twelve patients were converted for oncological (6) or technical reasons (6). The spleen was retained in 14/29 patients, either by main splenic vessel preservation (9) or solely supported by the short gastric vessels (5), resulting in inferior pole infarction in 2 patients. Overall morbidity was 39%, including 15% pancreatic fistula. All fistulas resolved after a median of 6 weeks without re-operation. A non-significant trend toward fewer fistulas with stapled rather than sutured stump closure was observed (13% vs 19%; p=0.43). Median operative duration and hospital stay were 157 min and 7 days, respectively. There was no mortality. CONCLUSION: LDP is a safe alternative to conventional resection for a wide range of lesions. As with open resection, pancreatic fistula is the dominant morbidity, but is generally indolent. While spleen preservation is often possible, care must be taken to avoid infarction of the inferior pole if the Warshaw technique is utilized.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...