LIVER RETRANSPLANTATION: PROGNOSTIC SCORES AND RESULTS IN THE STATE OF PARANÁ.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic retransplantation is associated with higher morbidity and mortality when compared to primary transplantation. Given the scarcity of organs and the need for efficient allocation, evaluating parameters that can predict post-retransplant survival is crucial. AIMS: This study aimed to analyze prognostic scores and outcomes of hepatic retransplantation. METHODS: Data on primary transplants and retransplants carried out in the state of Paraná in 2019 and 2020 were analyzed. The two groups were compared based on 30-day survival and the main prognostic scores of the donor and recipient, namely Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), MELD-albumin (MELD-a), Donor MELD (D-MELD), Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation (SOFT), Preallocation Score to Predict Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation (P-SOFT), and Balance of Risk (BAR). RESULTS: A total of 425 primary transplants and 30 retransplants were included in the study. The main etiology of hepatopathy in primary transplantation was ethylism (n=140; 31.0%), and the main reasons for retransplantation were primary graft dysfunction (n=10; 33.3%) and hepatic artery thrombosis (n=8; 26.2%). The 30-day survival rate was higher in primary transplants than in retransplants (80.5% vs. 36.7%, p=0.001). Prognostic scores were higher in retransplants than in primary transplants: MELD 30.6 vs. 20.7 (p=0.001); MELD-a 31.5 vs. 23.5 (p=0.001); D-MELD 1234.4 vs. 834.0 (p=0.034); SOFT 22.3 vs. 8.2 (p=0.001); P-SOFT 22.2 vs. 7.8 (p=0.001); and BAR 15.6 vs. 8.3 (p=0.001). No difference was found in terms of Donor Risk Index (DRI). CONCLUSIONS: Retransplants exhibited lower survival rates at 30 days, as predicted by prognostic scores, but unrelated to the donor's condition.

Liver retransplantation: prognostic scores and results in the state of paraná / Retransplante de fígado: escores prognósticos e resultados no estado do paraná

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Hepatic retransplantation is associated with higher morbidity and mortality when compared to primary transplantation. Given the scarcity of organs and the need for efficient allocation, evaluating parameters that can predict post-retransplant survival is crucial. AIMS: This study aimed to analyze prognostic scores and outcomes of hepatic retransplantation. METHODS: Data on primary transplants and retransplants carried out in the state of Paraná in 2019 and 2020 were analyzed. The two groups were compared based on 30-day survival and the main prognostic scores of the donor and recipient, namely Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), MELD-albumin (MELD-a), Donor MELD (D-MELD), Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation (SOFT), Preallocation Score to Predict Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation (P-SOFT), and Balance of Risk (BAR). RESULTS: A total of 425 primary transplants and 30 retransplants were included in the study. The main etiology of hepatopathy in primary transplantation was ethylism (n=140; 31.0%), and the main reasons for retransplantation were primary graft dysfunction (n=10; 33.3%) and hepatic artery thrombosis (n=8; 26.2%). The 30-day survival rate was higher in primary transplants than in retransplants (80.5% vs. 36.7%, p=0.001). Prognostic scores were higher in retransplants than in primary transplants: MELD 30.6 vs. 20.7 (p=0.001); MELD-a 31.5 vs. 23.5 (p=0.001); D-MELD 1234.4 vs. 834.0 (p=0.034); SOFT 22.3 vs. 8.2 (p=0.001); P-SOFT 22.2 vs. 7.8 (p=0.001); and BAR 15.6 vs. 8.3 (p=0.001). No difference was found in terms of Donor Risk Index (DRI). CONCLUSIONS: Retransplants exhibited lower survival rates at 30 days, as predicted by prognostic scores, but unrelated to the donor's condition.

RESUMO RACIONAL: O retransplante hepático está associado a maior morbimortalidade do que o transplante primário. Dada a escassez de órgãos e a necessidade de alocação eficiente, avaliar parâmetros que possam prever a sobrevida pós-retransmissão é crucial. OBJETIVOS: Analisar os resultados dos retransplantes hepáticos em relação aos principais escores prognósticos. MÉTODOS: Foram analisados os transplantes primários e os retransplantes realizados no Estado do Paraná nos anos de 2019 e 2020. Os dois grupos foram comparados em relação à sobrevida em 30 dias e aos principais escores prognósticos do doador e do receptor: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), MELD-albumin (MELD-a), Donor MELD (D-MELD), Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation (SOFT), Preallocation Score to Predict Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation (P-SOFT) e Balance of Risk (BAR). RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 425 transplantes primários e 30 retransplantes. A principal etiologia da hepatopatia no transplante primário dos pacientes retransplantados foi o etilismo (n=140; 31,0%), e os principais motivos para os retransplantes foram o não funcionamento primário do enxerto (n=10; 33,3%) e a trombose da artéria hepática (n=8; 26,2%). A sobrevida em 30 dias foi maior nos transplantes primários em relação aos retransplantes (80,5% vs 36,7%; p=0,001). Os escores prognósticos foram mais elevados nos retransplantes em relação aos transplantes primários: MELD 30,6 vs 20,7 (p=0,001); MELD-a 31,5 vs 23,5 (p=0,001); D-MELD 1234,4 vs 834,0 (p=0,034); SOFT 22,3 vs 8,2 (p=0,001); P-SOFT 22,2 vs 7,8 (p=0,001); e BAR 15,6 vs 8,3 (p=0,001). Não foi observada diferença em relação ao Índice de Risco do Doador. CONCLUSÕES: Os retransplantes apresentam menor sobrevida em 30 dias, prevista nos escores prognósticos, porém sem relação com a qualidade dos doadores.