Quality and Readability of Online Health Information on Common Urologic Cancers: Assessing Barriers to Health Literacy in Urologic Oncology.

INTRODUCTION: A growing number of Americans search online for health information related to urologic oncologic care each year. The American Medical Association recommends that medical information be written at a maximum sixth-grade level in order to be comprehensible by the majority of patients. As such, it is important to assess the quality and readability of online patient education material that patients are being exposed to. METHODS: A Google search was performed using the terms "testicular cancer," "prostate cancer," "kidney cancer," and "bladder cancer," and the top 30 results for each were reviewed. Websites were categorized based on their source. Readability was assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, the Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook indices. Quality was assessed using the DISCERN Quality Index (1-5 scale). RESULTS: A total of 91 websites were included in our analysis. On average, online health information pertaining to urologic cancers is written at a 10th- to 11th-grade reading level, which is significantly higher than that of an average American adult and that recommended by the American Medical Association (P < .01). The overall quality of websites was 3.4 ± 0.7, representing moderate to high quality. There was no significant difference in readability based on cancer type or information source. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being of moderate to high quality, online patient education materials related to common urologic cancers are often written at a grade level that exceeds the reading level of an average American adult. This presents as a barrier to online health literacy and calls into question the utility of these resources.

Unique case of vascularization: superficial brachial artery and radial persistent median artery.

During a routine cadaveric dissection of a 93-year-old male donor, unique arterial variations were observed in the right upper extremity. This rare arterial branching pattern began at the third part of the axillary artery (AA), where it gave off a large superficial brachial artery (SBA) before bifurcating into the subscapular artery and a common stem. The common stem then gave off a division for the anterior and posterior circumflex humeral arteries, before continuing as a small brachial artery (BA). The BA terminated as a muscular branch to the brachialis muscle. The SBA bifurcated into a large radial artery (RA) and small ulnar artery (UA) in the cubital fossa. The UA branching pattern was atypical, giving off only muscular branches in the forearm and a deep UA before contributing to the superficial palmar arch (SPA). The RA provided the radial recurrent artery and a common trunk (CT) proximally before continuing its course to the hand. The CT from the RA gave off a branch that divided into anterior and posterior ulnar recurrent arteries, as well as muscular branches, before it bifurcated into the persistent median artery (PMA) and the common interosseous artery. The PMA anastomosed with the UA before entering the carpal tunnel and contributed to the SPA. This case presents a unique combination of arterial variations in the upper extremity and is clinically and pathologically relevant.

Does the addition of post-operative gabapentin reduce the use of narcotics after orthopedic surgery?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of post-operative gabapentin administration as an analgesic agent and its effect on narcotic use after orthopedic surgery in an outpatient sports medicine practice by comparing patients prior to and after initiating the routine use of gabapentin as part of a standardized post-operative pain medication regimen. We hypothesized that adding gabapentin to a multimodal post-operative pain regimen would decrease the number of requested pain medication refills and have no detrimental effect on Visual Analogue Scale and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores at these early post-operative visits. METHODS: All outpatient surgical patients, <90 years of age, undergoing outpatient orthopedic surgery by the study's senior author were included between 08/05/2021 and 02/22/2022. Patients were allowed 1 narcotic refill post-operatively and only in the first 3 weeks. The primary outcome was difference in percentage of patients who requested a narcotic refill within 3 weeks post-op. Two- and 6-week Visual Analogue Scale and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores, and baseline health and demographic data. T-tests were run on continuous variables, Chi-Square or Fisher's Exact Test were run on dichotomous variables, and Mann-Whitney U test was run on all other categorical variables. Statistical significance was set at P < .05 for all tests. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in narcotic refills at 3 weeks: 23 pre-gabapentin patients and 9 post-gabapentin patients (22.8% vs 9.0%, respectively: P = .006). There were no differences between 2- and 6-week Visual Analogue Scale and 2-week Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores. There was a significant difference in 6-week SANE between groups: mean difference = 6.4 (P = .027) though less than the established MCID. CONCLUSION: Addition of gabapentin to a post-operative multimodal pain regimen reduced the use of narcotics after orthopedic sports medicine surgeries while also providing equivalent pain control.