Impact of intraoperative blood salvage and autologous transfusion during liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Intraoperative blood salvage (IBS) with autologous blood transfusion is controversial in liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study evaluated the role of IBS usage in LT for HCC. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study at a single center from 2002 to 2018, the outcomes of LT surgery for HCC were analyzed. Overall survival and disease-free survival of patients who received IBS were compared with those who did not receive IBS. Cancer recurrence, length of hospital stay, post-transplant complications, and blood loss also were evaluated. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate overall mid-term and long-term survival (4 and 6 years, respectively). RESULTS: Of the total 163 patients who underwent LT for HCC in the study period, 156 had complete demographic and clinical data and were included in the study. IBS was used in 122 and not used in 34 patients. Ninety-five (60.9%) patients were men, and the mean patient age was 58.5 ± 7.6 years. The overall 1-year, 5-year, and 7-year survival in the IBS group was 84.2%, 67.7%, and 56.8% vs. 85.3%, 67.5%, and 67.5% in the non-IBS group (p = 0.77). The 1-year, 5-year, and 7-year disease-free survival in the IBS group was 81.6%, 66.5%, and 55.4% vs. 85.3%, 64.1%, and 64.1% in the non-IBS group (p = 0.74). For patients without complete HCC necrosis (n = 121), the 1-year, 5-year, and 7-year overall survival rates for those who received IBS (n = 95) were 86.2%, 67.7%, and 49.6% vs. 84.6%, 70.0%, and 70.0% for 26 patients without IBS (p = 0.857). For the same patients, the 1-year, 5-year, and 7-year disease-free survival in the IBS group was 84.0%, 66.8%, and 64.0% vs. 88.0%, 72.8%, and 72.8% in the non-IBS group (p = 0.690). CONCLUSION: IBS does not appear to be associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing LT for HCC, even in the presence of viable HCC in the explant. There seems to be no reason to contraindicate the use of IBS in LT for HCC.

Liver transplantation in the setting of a spontaneous shunt between superior mesenteric vein and right renal vein.

Shunts between the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and the right renal vein (RRV) are very rare. Here, we describe and depict the rare case of a liver transplant (LT) in the setting of shunt between SMV and RRV. A 67-year-old white man presenting with Child C cirrhosis secondary to hemochromatosis and persistent encephalopathy was listed for LT. Preoperative abdominal angiotomography revealed the presence of a large spontaneous shunt between the SMV and the RRV. The patient underwent LT by receiving a liver from a 17-year-old brain-dead deceased donor victim of trauma. A large shunt between the SMV and the RRV was confirmed intraoperatively. Although there was no portal vein (PV) thrombosis, the PV was atrophic and had a reduced flow. PV pressure was 22mmHg (an arterial line was inserted inside the PV stump, and this line was connected to a common pressure transducer, the pressure readings was expressed in the anesthesia monitor). After shunt ligation PV pressure increased to 32mmHg. There were no post-transplant vascular complications, and the patient was discharged home in good health. Preoperative study of all LT candidates with angio CT scan is mandatory. Whenever there is PV thrombosis, an attempt to remove the entire thrombus is warranted. After thrombectomy or whenever there is not PV thrombosis, all large shunts should be ligated. PV pressure and flow should be measured before and after shunt ligation. In the absence of PV thrombosis, ligation of the shunt should enable an increase in PV flow and pressure, as reported herein.