RESUMO
Introduction: Surgical management of popliteal artery aneurysms has been described for half a century. Long term development of the excluded aneurysm sac in the popliteal segment however remains widely unknown, with only a few small series describing outcomes. Residual aneurysm perfusion has the potential to lead to serious complications. Report: A 63 year old man presents with skin and soft tissue necrosis of the right calf two years after proximal and distal aneurysm ligation and great saphenous vein bypass for a popliteal artery aneurysm. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography show perfusion of the excluded aneurysm as well as extensive necrosis of the gastrocnemius muscle. Direct angiography of the aneurysm demonstrated retrograde aneurysm perfusion due to insufficient distal ligation with recurrent micro-embolisation to the calf via geniculate arteries. Coiling of the geniculate arteries was performed, plugging the connection to the tibiofibular trunk and embolisation of the aneurysm sac. After the intervention, no flow was seen in the aneurysm sac and the patient made full recovery. Discussion: Residual aneurysm sac perfusion can lead to complications long after successful aneurysm exclusion. Follow-up after surgery of popliteal aneurysms should include observation of the excluded aneurysm sac with control of residual blood flow. For persistent sac perfusion, aneurysm enlargement or symptoms, further treatment should be considered. Surgical aspects such as complete transection of the artery after aneurysm ligation or end to end anastomosis of the bypass may be considered, to prevent such complications.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Evidence is lacking to guide the management of infective native aortic aneurysm (INAA). The aim of this study was to establish expert consensus on surgical and antimicrobial treatment and follow up, and to define when an INAA is considered cured. METHODS: Delphi methodology was used. The principal investigators invited 47 international experts (specialists in infectious diseases, radiology, nuclear medicine, and vascular and cardiothoracic surgery) via email. Four Delphi rounds were performed, three weeks each, using an online questionnaire with initially 28 statements. The panellists rated the statements on a five point Likert scale. Comments on statements were analysed, statements were revised and added or deleted, and the results were presented in the iterative rounds. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% of the panel rating a statement as strongly agree or agree on the Likert scale, and consensus on the final assessment was defined as Cronbach's alpha > 0.80. RESULTS: All 49 panellists completed all four rounds, resulting in 100% participation. One statement was added based on the results and comments of the panel, resulting in 29 final statements: three on need for consensus, 20 on treatment, five on follow up, and one on definition of cure. All 29 statements reached agreement of ≥ 86%. Cronbach's alpha increased for each consecutive round; round 1, 0.85; round 2, 0.90; round 3, 0.91; and round 4, 0.94. Thus, consensus was reached for all statements. CONCLUSION: INAAs are rare, and high level evidence to guide optimal management is lacking. This consensus document was established with the aim of helping clinicians manage these challenging patients, as a supplement to current guidelines. The presented consensus will need future amendments in accordance with newly acquired knowledge.
