Distribution and dynamics of Japanese beetles along the Indianapolis Airport perimeter and the influence of land use on trap catch.

As part of a program to minimize the accidental transportation of Japanese beetles (Popillia japonica) through cargo aircraft to areas where they are not established, a 4-yr trapping project was initiated to study the relative distribution and dynamics of the beetles along a trap line around the Indianapolis International Airport. Land use influence on beetle abundance (trap catch) was assessed using a geographic information system. Trap catch was consistently high in some locations and low in others. In general, high trap catches occurred near agronomic land planted with corn or soybeans, which are both preferred hosts of adult beetles. Low trap catches generally occurred in areas lacking preferred host plants. The amount of agronomic land within 500 m of the traps was always positively correlated with trap catch. Average trap catches were highly correlated by location from year to year, indicating stability of the relative distribution of the beetles along the trap line. Because high trap catches consistently occurred in the same locations, it can be inferred that trapping can be an effective method to monitor Japanese beetle populations. Taking airport-owned agronomic land out of corn and soybean production near the cargo terminals may reduce beetle activity in these areas.

Impact of four insecticides on Japanese beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) egg predators and white grubs in turfgrass.

Field experiments were conducted to measure the effects of four commonly used turfgrass insecticides (isofenphos, diazinon, imidacloprid, halofenozide) on white grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) and ant predators of white grub eggs. Ant populations were measured over time with canned tuna, whereas predation by the ants was measured with artificially placed Japanese beetle, Popillia japonica Newman, eggs. The effectiveness of each insecticide at controlling Japanese beetle grubs, when applied at different times during the growing season, also was measured. Isofenphos and diazinon significantly reduced both ant numbers and white grub egg predation, whereas imidacloprid and one halofenozide treatment did not significantly impact either measurement. A second halofenozide treatment significantly reduced white grub egg predation. Isofenphos and diazinon were ineffective at controlling Japanese beetle grubs when applied in June but were highly efficacious when applied in August. Evidence of enhanced biodegradation was found in plots that received both June and August applications of diazinon. Both June and August applications of imidacloprid and halofenozide provided good control of white grubs.

Evaluation of a computerized polysomnographic system.

Computerized polysomnographic systems have came into common use in sleep laboratories around the world. Despite potential advantages over standard paper polysomnography, these computerized systems have been minimally evaluated as to accuracy, analysis time, or cost effectiveness when compared to paper. We evaluated the Healthdyne ALICE 3 system for comparability to paper polysomnography in sleep quantification and technician analysis time. Fifty patients were recorded simultaneously both on paper and on the ALICE 3 system and analyzed blindly with summary data from these records being quantified and compared. Five additional patients were studied for epoch-by-epoch analysis. Score-rescore assessments were accomplished for both groups. The results indicate that when allowed to autoscore, this computerized system produced substantial errors in sleep staging (REM sleep time 56.4 + 4.9 minutes vs 73.2 + 8.4 minutes for paper versus computer). This was the case for respiratory (AHI of 26.5 + 4.3 vs 15.3 + 2.6 for paper vs computer) and arousal assessment as well. However, with editing, similar results to those obtained with paper were achieved (REM sleep time -56.4 + 4.9 vs 59.0 + 4.6; AHI -26.5 + 4.3 vs 26.1 + 4.7 for paper and computer respectively), with differences rarely exceeding score-rescore discrepancies. Analysis time was substantially reduced by use of the computer (172.6 + 9.9 vs 79.7 + 4.8 minutes for paper vs computer). Epoch-by-epoch analysis revealed a trend to score toward wakefulness or lighter sleep on computer compared to paper although the differences were small. Respiratory, arousal and PLM scoring were quite similar. In conclusion, this study suggests that the ALICE 3 system with editing can produce results similar to those obtained with paper.

Evaluation of the Healthdyne NightWatch system to titrate CPAP in the home.

Although a number of devices have been developed to monitor sleep and breathing in the home, there are few publications on methodologies by which CPAP can be titrated in the home setting. This study was conducted to determine the outcome of CPAP titration in the home using the Healthdyne NightWatch (NW) system. This home sleep-evaluation system was used to diagnose sleep apnea in 30 patients using a previously described methodology. These patients subsequently underwent CPAP titration in the home using the NW system, with modem technology allowing the transfer of data from the home to the laboratory. This group was compared with 30 patients who were diagnosed with sleep apnea using standard in-lab polysomnography and had CPAP titrated on a full night in the laboratory. Both groups were subsequently placed on CPAP at the appropriate pressure for 6-8 weeks, after which a full in-lab study was completed to assess CPAP efficacy at the prescribed pressure. Compliance was also determined using a pressure-activated monitor. No differences in any variable assessed could be found between the two groups. Mean compliance was 4.6 + 0.5 (SEM) and 4.3 + 0.5 hours of CPAP use per night for the home and in-lab groups respectively. Mean AHIs on the follow-up study were 7.4 + 1.2 and 7.6 + 1.6 events per hour for the home versus in-lab groups. Sleep stage distribution was also quite comparable between groups. As a result, this study suggests that sleep apnea can be diagnosed and CPAP titrated in the home with a similar outcome, at least at 6 to 8 weeks, to standard in-laboratory testing.

Assessment of accuracy and analysis time of a novel device to monitor sleep and breathing in the home.

Obstructive sleep apnea is increasingly recognized as a common and debilitating disorder. As a result, a variety of diagnostic technologies have evolved to potentially decrease cost and improve access and ease of assessment. In this study we compared the Healthdyne NightWatch (NW) System (a home sleep diagnostic methodology) to standard polysomnography (PSG) in two sleep centers. Two separate studies were completed. NW was compared to a simultaneously obtained PSG in 30 patients (IN-LAB study). Seventy additional patients were studied in both the home with NW and in the laboratory with PSG (HOME-LAB study). The NW system records eye movement, leg movement, SaO2, nasal-oral airflow, chest and abdominal wall motion, body position and heart rate on a solid state recorder, which permits sleep staging based on body and eye movement and standard respiratory assessment. For the PSG, standard paper recording techniques were used. The IN-LAB study revealed a correlation between NW and PSG for total sleep time of r = 0.72, with NW tending to score some awake time as nonrapid eye movement sleep. The correlation for apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was r = 0.94 between systems, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 63.6% at an AHI threshold of 10. The HOME-LAB study demonstrated understandably poor correlations between NW and PSG for most measures of sleep, which is likely a product of night-to-night variability in sleep, home versus laboratory effects and the differences in sleep staging methodology. However, the correlation for AHI was r = 0.92, with a sensitivity of 90.7% and a specificity of 70.4% at an AHI threshold of 10. Using a new methodology to assess agreement between diagnostic systems, we observed 78.6% diagnostic agreement between NW and PSG in the HOME-LAB study, with NW underestimating AHI 4.3% of the time and overestimating it in 17.1% of cases. This may relate to night-to-night variability in AHI or greater NW computer sensitivity to subtle hypopneas. We conclude that NW provides an accurate determination of AHI in both the home and laboratory, using limited instrumentation. The analysis time for NW is also reduced compared to PSG, and patients generally prefer the NW evaluation.