Tolerance, physical dependence, and addiction: Knowledge gaps and misconceptions of first-year pharmacy students.

INTRODUCTION: Misconceptions related to terminology used in the diagnosis and treatment of substance use disorders are common among healthcare providers and may contribute to inappropriate management and education of patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate baseline knowledge of addiction, tolerance, and physical dependence in first-year pharmacy students completing a unit on the neurobiological basis of addiction. METHODS: Students were asked to define the terms addiction, tolerance, and dependence at the beginning of a didactic unit on nervous system pathophysiology and pharmacology. Handwritten responses were transcribed to a spreadsheet and deidentified by sequential assignment to a single numeric identifier. Data were analyzed by three reviewers through open coding and thematic analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the results. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven individual student submitted responses were included in the analysis. Many students were unable to provide a substantive definition for the terms physical dependence (32%) and addiction (27%). The definition of tolerance was partially correct in >80% of student responses, though no students provided a complete description. Approximately 5% of students defined physical dependence as addiction, and > 18% incorrectly attributed withdrawal symptoms to addiction. CONCLUSIONS: Significant knowledge gaps or misconceptions regarding terminology related to substance use disorder exists among first-year pharmacy students despite continuing efforts within professional organizations to develop consensus definitions. Developing effective teaching methods to identify and correct misinformation and preconceptions related to care for patients with substance use disorders should continue to be a priority for pharmacy educators.

Integration of mentored self-directed learning (MSDL) through both group and individual presentations in an accelerated modified block program.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Project aim was to examine the feasibility and logistics of mentored self-directed learning (MSDL) through group and individual presentations in an accelerated modified block curriculum. Perspectives of students and faculty members toward the incorporation of MSDL were also explored. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: During a two-week pharmacotherapy block, students made group presentations requiring two elements: a case presentation on curricular content (Element-1) and an inclusion of "novel" information students did not receive didactically (Element-2). Curricular content for Element-1 stemmed from a pharmacotherapy course on gastroenterology and nutrition, and individual presentations were scheduled during a semester-long skill-based course. Surveys on student perspectives were conducted at baseline, after group presentations, and after individual presentations. Faculty members also provided feedback and evaluations. FINDINGS: Whereas 58% of students considered a case presentation (Element-1) more valuable for their learning than inclusion of Element-2, 78% of faculty's responses indicated the incorporation of both Elements was valuable. For the following individual presentations, 73% of students were willing and able to present a topic not extensively addressed in the didactic curriculum by employing MSDL. Students improved their confidence in preparing and making presentations for peers and faculty/preceptors through the MSDL activities (p < 0.025). At the end of this project, the faculty determined 88% of students were ready to give a presentation considered appropriate for Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience. DISCUSSION: MSDL through group and individual presentation activities were feasible and provided a valuable learning experience for students in an accelerated modified block curriculum.