A feasibility study to explore the use of digital treatment of sleep as a first-step intervention to improve adolescent mental health.

INTRODUCTION: Cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia (CBTi), delivered face-to-face or digitally, can improve the mental health of adults. Although insomnia is common in adolescents, the effects of digital CBTi on adolescent mental health have seldom been investigated. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to explore: (i) the acceptability of a digital CBTi intervention, Sleepio, as a first-step intervention for adolescents referred to specialist mental health services (CAMHS), (ii) the impact on sleep and mental health and (iii) subsequent CAMHS interventions. METHOD: Sleepio is a computerized CBTi intervention comprised of six sequentially delivered sessions. Digital Sleepio was offered to new referrals to CAMHS with poor sleep and mental health problems. Results. Of the 75 eligible adolescents, 70 (93%; 95% CI: 85% to 98%) accepted Sleepio with 59 starting the programme and consenting to participate in the study. Of these, 37 (63%; 95% CI: 49% to 75%) completed at least half of the programme. There were post-intervention improvements in sleep, mood, and anxiety; the improvement in sleep was greater for those who completed at least half the programme compared to those who did not. Of those who completed all the programme, 55% (15/29) did not need any subsequent specialist CAMHS input. Of the 11 adolescents who accepted but never started Sleepio, none engaged with other CAMHS interventions and were subsequently discharged. CONCLUSION: Our study has a number of limitations, in particular the absence of a control group and the loss of follow-up data for programme drop-outs. Nonetheless, these results suggest that digital CBTi may offer a novel and acceptable way of improving the sleep and mental health of adolescents with insomnia. A fully powered randomized controlled trial is required to obtain definitive estimates of the effects of the intervention.

Assessing recovery in treatment as usual provided by community child and adolescent mental health services.

BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of routinely assessing the outcomes of everyday practice, few studies have reported outcome metrics for child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS). AIMS: Our aim is to investigate reliable change and recovery rates for treatment as usual, provided by one community CAMHS over two time periods. METHOD: We prospectively audited accepted consecutive referrals from November 2017 to January 2018, and April to September 2019. Cases with paired outcomes were identified, and reliable change and recovery rates were calculated. RESULTS: Baseline outcome data were obtained for 672 (78.2%) and 744 (77.5%) young people in 2018 and 2019, respectively. Of eligible participants, 174 (59.2%) and 155 (45.7%) completed at least one follow-up outcome measure in 2018 and 2019, respectively. Pre- and post-test scores on the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) showed a reduction in symptoms. Total RCADS scores showed 21-25% of participants reliably improved, with 44-49% showing reliable improvement on one or more subscale. On the SDQ, 11 (15.5%) and 19 (25.3%) participants reported reliable improvement on at least one subscale in 2018 and 2019, respectively. Reliable recovery rates ranged from 48 to 51% for youth-completed and 40 to 42% for parent-completed RCADS. CONCLUSIONS: Half of young people receiving treatment as usual from CAMHS reliably improved on at least one routine outcome measure subscale, improvement rates comparable with adult psychological therapies services. Our findings indicate that reliable change and recovery on subscale rather than total scores may be a better indication of outcomes.

Making sense of child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS): An audit of the referral journey and the use of routine outcome measures (ROMS).

BACKGROUND: There is increased emphasis on the national reporting of Routine Outcome Measures (ROMS) as a way of improving Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). This data needs to be viewed in context so that reasons for outcome completion rates are understood and monitored over time. METHOD: We undertook an in-depth prospective audit of consecutive referrals accepted into the Bath and North East Somerset, Swindon and Wiltshire (BSW) CAMHS service from November 2017 to January 2018 (n = 1074) and April to September 2019 (n = 1172). RESULTS: Across both audits 90% of those offered an appointment were seen with three quarters completing baseline ROMS. One in three were not seen again with around 30% still being open to the service at the end of each audit. Of those closed to the service, paired ROMS were obtained for 46% to 60% of cases. There were few changes in referral problems or complexity factors over time. CONCLUSION: Understanding the referral journey and the reasons for attrition will help to put nationally collected data in context and can inform and monitor service transformation over time.