Exposure-safety and efficacy response relationships and population pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate.

OBJECTIVES: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily (QD) oral antiepileptic drug (AED) for focal-onset seizures (FOS). Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) models were developed to assess dose selection, identify significant AED drug interactions, and quantitate relationships between exposure and safety and efficacy outcomes from Phase 3 trials of adjunctive ESL. METHODS: Eslicarbazepine (the primary active metabolite of ESL) population PK was evaluated using data from 1351 subjects enrolled in 14 studies (11 Phase 1 and three Phase 3 studies) after multiple oral doses ranging from 400 to 1200 mg. Population PK and PD models related individual eslicarbazepine exposures to safety outcomes and efficacy responses. RESULTS: Eslicarbazepine PK was described by a one-compartment model with linear absorption and elimination. The probability of a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE; dizziness, headache, or somnolence) was higher with an initial dose of ESL 800 mg than with an initial dose of ESL 400 mg QD. Body weight, sex, region, and baseline use of carbamazepine (CBZ) or lamotrigine were also found to influence the probability of TEAEs. Eslicarbazepine exposure influenced serum sodium concentration, standardized seizure frequency, and probability of response; better efficacy outcomes were predicted in patients not from Western Europe (WE; vs WE patients) and those not taking CBZ (vs taking CBZ) at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetic and PK/PD modeling were implemented during the development of ESL for adjunctive treatment of FOS in adults. This quantitative approach supported decision-making during the development of ESL, and contributed to dosing recommendations and labeling information related to drug interactions.

Antiepileptic drugs in patients with malignant brain tumor: beyond seizures and pharmacokinetics.

In neurological malignancies, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are frequently used to control the seizure activity that accompanies the disorder. There is a growing body of evidence on the importance of AED selection for reasons other than pharmacokinetics (PK) properties. Epigenetic modifications may occur in glioblastomas, such as changes in gene methylation and histone acetylation states. Secondary mechanisms of AED drug action which impact these epigenetic modifications could play a significant role in patient survival outcomes. Both valproic acid (VPA) and carbamazepine have histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitory activities, and levetiracetam and VPA reduce the activity of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), a DNA-repair molecule implicated in resistance to alkylating agents used for chemotherapy. The use of AEDs for purposes other than seizure prophylaxis and their selection based on non-PK properties present a potential paradigm shift in the field of neuro-oncology.

Vigabatrin-associated retinal damage: potential biochemical mechanisms.

Vigabatrin (VGB), an irreversible inhibitor of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transaminase, is approved as adjunct treatment of refractory partial seizures as well as infantile spasms. Although VGB has been proven to be effective, its use is limited by the risk of retinopathy and associated peripheral visual field defects. This review describes and analyzes current literature related to potential pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying VGB-mediated cellular toxicity. Animal data suggest that GABA mediates neural excitotoxicity. The amino acid taurine is concentrated in retinal cells, and deficiency of this amino acid may be involved in VGB-mediated retinal degeneration and possible phototoxicity.

Practice parameter update: management issues for women with epilepsy--focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): vitamin K, folic acid, blood levels, and breastfeeding: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To reassess the evidence for management issues related to the care of women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy, including preconceptional folic acid use, prenatal vitamin K use, risk of hemorrhagic disease of the newborn, clinical implications of placental and breast milk transfer of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), risks of breastfeeding, and change in AED levels during pregnancy. METHODS: A 20-member committee evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review and classification of relevant articles published between 1985 and October 2007. RESULTS: Preconceptional folic acid supplementation is possibly effective in preventing major congenital malformations in the newborns of WWE taking AEDs. There is inadequate evidence to determine if the newborns of WWE taking AEDs have a substantially increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. Primidone and levetiracetam probably transfer into breast milk in amounts that may be clinically important. Valproate, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine probably are not transferred into breast milk in clinically important amounts. Pregnancy probably causes an increase in the clearance and a decrease in the concentration of lamotrigine, phenytoin, and to a lesser extent carbamazepine, and possibly decreases the level of levetiracetam and the active oxcarbazepine metabolite, the monohydroxy derivative. RECOMMENDATIONS: Supplementing women with epilepsy with at least 0.4 mg of folic acid before they become pregnant may be considered (Level C). Monitoring of lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and phenytoin levels during pregnancy should be considered (Level B) and monitoring of levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine (as monohydroxy derivative) levels may be considered (Level C). A paucity of evidence limited the strength of many recommendations.

Practice parameter update: management issues for women with epilepsy--focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): obstetrical complications and change in seizure frequency: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To reassess the evidence for management issues related to the care of women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy, including the risk of pregnancy complications or other medical problems during pregnancy in WWE compared to other women, change in seizure frequency, the risk of status epilepticus, and the rate of remaining seizure-free during pregnancy. METHODS: A 20-member committee including general neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review and classification of relevant articles published between 1985 and February 2008. RESULTS: For WWE taking antiepileptic drugs, there is probably no substantially increased risk (greater than two times expected) of cesarean delivery or late pregnancy bleeding, and probably no moderately increased risk (greater than 1.5 times expected) of premature contractions or premature labor and delivery. There is possibly a substantially increased risk of premature contractions and premature labor and delivery during pregnancy for WWE who smoke. Seizure freedom for at least 9 months prior to pregnancy is probably associated with a high likelihood (84%-92%) of remaining seizure-free during pregnancy. RECOMMENDATIONS: Women with epilepsy (WWE) should be counseled that seizure freedom for at least 9 months prior to pregnancy is probably associated with a high rate (84%-92%) of remaining seizure-free during pregnancy (Level B). However, WWE who smoke should be counseled that they possibly have a substantially increased risk of premature contractions and premature labor and delivery during pregnancy (Level C).

Practice parameter update: management issues for women with epilepsy--focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): teratogenesis and perinatal outcomes: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To reassess the evidence for management issues related to the care of women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy. METHODS: Systematic review of relevant articles published between January 1985 and June 2007. RESULTS: It is highly probable that intrauterine first-trimester valproate (VPA) exposure has higher risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) compared to carbamazepine and possible compared to phenytoin or lamotrigine. Compared to untreated WWE, it is probable that VPA as part of polytherapy and possible that VPA as monotherapy contribute to the development of MCMs. It is probable that antiepileptic drug (AED) polytherapy as compared to monotherapy regimens contributes to the development of MCMs and to reduced cognitive outcomes. For monotherapy, intrauterine exposure to VPA probably reduces cognitive outcomes. Further, monotherapy exposure to phenytoin or phenobarbital possibly reduces cognitive outcomes. Neonates of WWE taking AEDs probably have an increased risk of being small for gestational age and possibly have an increased risk of a 1-minute Apgar score of <7. RECOMMENDATIONS: If possible, avoidance of valproate (VPA) and antiepileptic drug (AED) polytherapy during the first trimester of pregnancy should be considered to decrease the risk of major congenital malformations (Level B). If possible, avoidance of VPA and AED polytherapy throughout pregnancy should be considered to prevent reduced cognitive outcomes (Level B). If possible, avoidance of phenytoin and phenobarbital during pregnancy may be considered to prevent reduced cognitive outcomes (Level C). Pregnancy risk stratification should reflect that the offspring of women with epilepsy taking AEDs are probably at increased risk for being small for gestational age (Level B) and possibly at increased risk of 1-minute Apgar scores of <7 (Level C).

Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs I: treatment of new onset epilepsy: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the evidence demonstrating efficacy, tolerability, and safety of seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide-reviewed in the order in which these agents received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration) in the treatment of children and adults with newly diagnosed partial and generalized epilepsies. METHODS: A 23-member committee, including general neurologists, pediatric neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy, evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review including MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane library for relevant articles from 1987 until September 2002, with selected manual searches up until 2003. RESULTS: There is evidence either from comparative or dose-controlled trials that gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine have efficacy as monotherapy in newly diagnosed adolescents and adults with either partial or mixed seizure disorders. There is also evidence that lamotrigine is effective for newly diagnosed absence seizures in children. Evidence for effectiveness of the new AEDs in newly diagnosed patients with other generalized epilepsy syndromes is lacking. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this evidence-based assessment provide guidelines for the prescription of AEDs for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and identify those seizure types and syndromes where more evidence is necessary.

Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs II: treatment of refractory epilepsy: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the evidence demonstrating efficacy, tolerability, and safety of seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide) in the treatment of children and adults with refractory partial and generalized epilepsies. METHODS: A 23-member committee including general neurologists, pediatric neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review including MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane library for relevant articles from 1987 until March 2003. RESULTS: All of the new AEDs were found to be appropriate for adjunctive treatment of refractory partial seizures in adults. Gabapentin can be effective for the treatment of mixed seizure disorders, and gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate for the treatment of refractory partial seizures in children. Limited evidence suggests that lamotrigine and topiramate are also effective for adjunctive treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsy in adults and children, as well as treatment of the Lennox Gastaut syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of AED depends upon seizure and/or syndrome type, patient age, concomitant medications, AED tolerability, safety, and efficacy. The results of this evidence-based assessment provide guidelines for the prescription of AEDs for patients with refractory epilepsy and identify those seizure types and syndromes where more evidence is necessary.

Effects of antiepileptic comedication on levetiracetam pharmacokinetics: a pooled analysis of data from randomized adjunctive therapy trials.

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of commonly used antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on levetiracetam pharmacokinetics at steady state. METHODS: Plasma levetiracetam concentrations at steady state were determined by capillary gas chromatography in 590 epilepsy patients included in phase III trials and treated with doses of 1000-4000 mg per day in two divided daily doses. The data were pooled and kinetic parameters estimated by repeated measurement covariance analysis on log-transformed dose-adjusted concentrations (regression line as function of time elapsed since last dose). RESULTS: Estimated pharmacokinetic values, normalized to a dose of 1 mgkg(-1) b.i.d., were: concentration at 1h (C(1h)) 2.1 microgram ml(-1), concentration at 12h (C(12h)) 0.8 microgram ml(-1), area under the curve from 0 to 12h (AUC(0-12h)) 17.1 microgram ml(-1)h, half-life (t(1/2)) 8.1h, and apparent oral clearance (CL/F) 0.97 mlmin(-1)kg(-1). Parameters were similar between genders and among dosage subgroups. Compared with patients receiving comedication not considered to affect drug metabolizing enzymes (gabapentin, lamotrigine, vigabatrin), levetiracetam concentrations and t(1/2) tended to be lower in patients receiving enzyme-inducing AEDs (carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone) and higher in patients receiving valproic acid, but the differences were modest. CONCLUSIONS: Estimated parameters were dose independent, comparable to those from smaller scale studies and not affected to any major extent by gender or comedication with other AEDs. Based on this, no need is anticipated for adjusting levetiracetam dosage according to type of concomitantly prescribed AEDs.

Pharmacokinetics of the new antiepileptic drugs.

A physician's choice of an antiepileptic drug (AED) usually depends upon the patient's seizure type. But the pharmacokinetic characteristics of AEDs can further help determine the best drug for a particular patient. These characteristics, including absorption, elimination pathway, and potential for drug interactions, are of critical importance for patients who take other medication for comorbid conditions and for patients with impaired renal or hepatic function. The ideal AED would have a rapid, linear, consistent absorption rate with complete clearance, low plasma protein binding, and rapid central nervous system penetration. It would be eliminated predominantly by the kidneys. The new AEDs do not prompt the same concerns about interactions because they have much better pharmacokinetic profiles than the older drugs and as a result require less monitoring for potential interactions.

Pharmacologic management of epilepsy in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: To review the epidemiology and pharmacologic management of epilepsy in elderly patients. DATA SOURCES: Controlled trials, case studies, and review articles identified via MEDLINE using the search terms epilepsy, seizures, elderly, phenobarbital, primidone, phenytoin, carbamazepine, valproic acid, felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and zonisamide. Recently published standard textbooks on epilepsy were also consulted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Epilepsy is a common neurologic disorder in the elderly. Cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative diseases are the most common causes of new-onset seizures in these patients. Alterations in protein binding, distribution, elimination, and increased sensitivity to the pharmacodynamic effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are relatively frequent, and these factors should be assessed at the initiation, and during adjustment, of treatment. Drug-drug interactions are also an important issue in elderly patients, because multiple drug use is common and AEDs are susceptible to many interactions. In addition to understanding age-related changes in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of AEDs, clinicians should know the common seizure types in the elderly and the spectrum of AED activity for these seizure types. AEDs with activity against both partial-onset and generalized seizures include felbamate, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, topiramate, valproic acid, and zonisamide. Other AEDs discussed in this review (carbamazepine, gabapentin, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, and tiagabine) are most useful for partial-onset seizures. CONCLUSION: The provision of safe and effective drug therapy to elderly patients requires an understanding of the unique age-related changes' in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of AEDs as well as an appreciation of common seizure types and the drugs that are effective for the specific types seen in the elderly.

Fosphenytoin: pharmacokinetics and tolerance of intramuscular loading doses.

PURPOSE: Fosphenytoin (FPHT; Cerebyx) is well absorbed when given intramuscularly (IM). All prior pharmacokinetic studies had the first plasma sample obtained 30 min after IM administration. The objectives of this study were to determine the rate and extent of FPHT absorption and to evaluate the tolerability of IM FPHT compared with IM saline. METHODS: This was an open-label, double-blinded study in which patients received 10 mg/kg dose of IM FPHT in one gluteus and IM saline in the other gluteus. Half the patients received saline injection of equal volume to FPHT (up to 19.5 mL); the other half received 2 mL of saline. Neurologic examination, vital signs, PHT blood samples, injection site examination, and subjective pain scores at injection site were obtained before and at timed intervals for 6 h. RESULTS: Total PHT serum concentrations 10 microg/mL were obtained in 5 min in 14.3% of patients and in 26.3% after 10 min. More than half the patients had therapeutic serum concentrations at 30 min; 45.8% of patients reported no pain at either the FPHT or saline injection site. No significant difference in pain was noted between FPHT and saline injection sites at 60 min and thereafter. Early decrease in blood pressure occurred but was not clinically significant. Classic PHT-induced central nervous system (CNS) side effects were evident in one third of patients within 1 h after injection. CONCLUSIONS: (a) IM FPHT is rapidly absorbed (therapeutic levels achieved as early as 5-20 min). (b) IM FPHT is well tolerated by most patients irrespective of injection volume.

Antiepileptic drug interactions.

This article reviews the potential interactions of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles involved. It describes the absorptive and distributive properties of AEDs and the effects on protein binding, hepatic metabolism, and elimination resulting from co-administration of AEDs with food or other drugs. Drug behavior is a function of absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination. Administration of either multiple AEDs or a combination of AEDs plus drugs for other conditions can modify any of these physiologic processes, possibly resulting in complex interactions. These may include alterations in the bio-availability and absorption of a drug and changes in half-life and serum level through induction or inhibition of hepatic metabolism. In most cases, increases or decreases in serum concentrations will signal a drug interaction. In other cases, clinically significant drug interactions remain undetected owing to apparently stable serum concentrations. Co-administration of drugs may affect the rate of clearance of one or both drugs. The effect on clearance varies, owing to genetic factors, patient characteristics (age and presence of co-morbidities), and individual responses. AEDs that induce hepatic metabolism can also influence the metabolism of concomitantly administered non-epilepsy medications and can interfere with oral contraceptives, as well as vitamins D and K. Patients with renal insufficiency or advanced age may experience incomplete renal excretion and should receive reduced dosages of drug. Understanding the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic properties of AEDs and the route of metabolism of all competing drugs is important for optimal management of patients with epilepsy and for prevention of avoidable drug interactions.

Pediatric epilepsy surgery: neuroimaging, neuropsychology, and anticonvulsants.

Neuroimaging and the neuropsychological evaluation are important components of the presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Advances in neuroimaging over the last decade, to a large part, underlie improvements in pediatric epilepsy surgery outcomes. The neuropsychological evaluation plays an important role in the evaluation of the older child and adolescent, particularly in the evaluation of mesial temporal sclerosis. However, its role in the young child being considered for surgery remains to be defined. This section reviews the definition of medical intractability, issues related to medication withdrawal during video-EEG monitoring, recent neuroimaging advances, and the neuropsychological evaluation.

Lack of an effect of valproate concentration on lamotrigine pharmacokinetics in developmentally disabled patients with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: to describe the population pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine (LTG) in developmentally disabled (DD) patients with epilepsy and (2) to determine if there is an effect of valproate (VPA) concentration on the extent of the pharmacokinetic interaction between VPA and LTG. METHOD: a NONMEM population analysis of steady-state LTG serum concentrations was conducted in patients receiving LTG either as mono or polytherapy with either an enzyme inducer (IND)-carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB) or an inhibitor (VPA). RESULTS: sixty-two patients (33.6+/-11.3 years, 47+/-9.9 kg) receiving LTG monotherapy (n=19) or polytherapy with VPA (n=15), inducer(s) (n=32) or both (n=5) were evaluated. LTG dose of 369+/-236 mg per day (8.1+/-5.9 mg/kg per day) achieved LTG plasma concentrations of 6.8+/-3.3 microg/ml. The observed LTG monotherapy, LTG+IND, and LTG+VPA oral clearance (Cl/F) were 0. 69+/-0.2, 1.60+/-0.65 and 0.2+/-0.05 ml/kg per min, respectively. The final LTG Cl/F model was dependent on body weight, concomitant VPA, and either single or multiple inducers. Including the serum concentrations of CBZ, PHT, or VPA in the model, did not significantly improve estimates of Cl/F. CONCLUSION: LTG Cl/F in DD patients is similar to literature values for ambulatory adult patients; however, low weight adult patients have higher elimination rates, as well as an increased response to enzyme induction. VPA inhibition of LTG Cl/F is maximal within the usually accepted therapeutic range for VPA.

Use of gabapentin in the treatment of neuropathic pain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of gabapentin for the treatment of neuropathic pain. DATA SOURCES: Clinical literature was identified through MEDLINE (from 1990 to October 1999). Key search terms were gabapentin and pain. DATA SYNTHESIS: Neuropathic pain can be a problematic, chronic syndrome that is frequently refractory to current drug treatments. Gabapentin is a newer generation antiepileptic drug that is commonly used in treatment of neuropathic pain. An evaluation of clinical trials using gabapentin to treat neuropathic pain was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin appears to be effective in treating various neuropathic pain disorders. Gabapentin may have advantages over current therapies, such as a favorable safety profile and lack of drug interactions; however, cost issues and limited experience may limit the use of gabapentin as a first-line option.

Inter- and intra-subject variability in gabapentin absorption and absolute bioavailability.

UNLABELLED: Gabapentin (GBP) is a non-metabolized, non-plasma protein bound, renally excreted antiepileptic drug that is actively absorbed via the system L amino acid transporter. Previous studies have demonstrated that gabapentin displays dose-dependent absorption. OBJECTIVES: These studies were conducted to determine inter- and intra-subject variability of gabapentin absorption. Two prospective clinical studies in healthy adult volunteers were conducted. Coefficient of variation (CV) was used to express variability of gabapentin absorption. METHODS: Study A: 400-mg single dose, randomized, cross-over study to assess bioavailability of four different gabapentin formulations (n=20, 9 males, 11 females; mean age and weight 41 years, 75.1 kg). Plasma was serially collected up to 48 h and bioavailability (F) calculated post-dose to determine concentration-time curves (AUC). All four formulations were bioequivalent, thus repeated measures analysis was performed to assess inter-and intra-subject variability. Study B: 600-mg single dose study (n=50, 15 males, 35 females; mean age and weight 31.1 years, 72.7 kg) was conducted to determine inter-subject variability in gabapentin F. Urine was collected over 48 h and bioavailability (F) calculated. Urine and plasma gabapentin concentrations were measured by HPLC-UV. RESULTS: Study A: Overall mean (CV) of GBP AUC values was 34.1+/-24 ug/h per ml. Inter-subject CV for AUC was 22.5% and intra-subject CV was 12.1%. Study B: Overall mean (SD) GBP F was 49.3+/-13.6%. Inter-subject CV of F was 27.6%. DISCUSSION: The inter-subject variability in gabapentin absorption is substantially less than that of the inter-subject variability. This indicates that one would expect a wide range in gabapentin absorption between subjects; however, a much smaller variability within a subject. The within subject variability of gabapentin is small enough that plasma drug monitoring may be used to assess gabapentin absorption for a given subject and the benefit of dose individualization.

Efficacy of lamotrigine in institutionalized, developmentally disabled patients with epilepsy: a retrospective evaluation.

The paper evaluates the efficacy of the newer anticonvulsant lamotrigine in a developmentally disabled patient population. A retrospective evaluation was done at two institutional centres to assess adjunctive lamotrigine (Lamictal) efficacy in a developmentally disabled population. Mean seizure frequency was compared between a 2-month pre-lamotrigine baseline period and a 2-month treatment period. A 3-month lamotrigine titration phase occurred between baseline and treatment periods. Seizure frequency data was obtained from standardized, daily seizure records. Adverse effect data was obtained from medical and nursing notes. An intent to treat analysis was performed. Data were analysed using Student's t-test for paired data. We evaluated 44 centre residents (25 male, 19 female, average age 33 +/- 11 years). Mean lamotrigine dose was 272 +/- 133 mg per day. A significant reduction in seizure frequency was noted. Seizure frequency (all seizures) was 10.1 +/- 11.2 during the baseline period vs. 5.8 +/- 7.9 seizures per month during the treatment period (P = 0.002). Thirty-two percent of patients (n = 14) had greater than a 75% reduction in seizure frequency. Twenty-three percent of patients (n = 10) had a 50-74% seizure reduction. Twenty-five percent of patients (n = 11) had less than a 50% reduction in seizures, while 20% (n = 9) had an increase in seizures. A significant reduction of 48% in generalized seizures (9.5 +/- 11.6 vs. 4.9 +/- 6.5 seizures per month, P = 0.013) was noted. Reductions in partial seizure frequency of 48% (7.9 +/- 10 vs. 4 +/- 6.6 seizures per month, P = 0.16) as well as in mixed-type seizures (19.9 +/- 9.3 was vs. 15 +/- 12.1 seizures per month, P = 0.11) were also seen; however, these changes did not reach significance. Overall, lamotrigine was well tolerated by the subject population. Adjunctive treatment with lamotrigine appears to be an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for seizures in a significant percentage of developmentally disabled patients with epilepsy.