Antithrombotic Treatment for Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) are at ele - vated risk for cardiovascular events and vascular events affecting the limbs. The goals of antithrombotic treatment are to keep vessels open after revascularization, to prevent cardiovascular events, and to lessen the frequency of peripheral ischemia and of amputation. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search, with particular attention to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and the German and European angiological guidelines. RESULTS: Diabetes mellitus and nicotine abuse are the main risk factors for lower limb PAOD. The evidence for the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic treatment in patients with PAOD is limited, in particular, after surgical or endovascular revascularization. Intensifying antithrombotic treatment with stronger antiplatelet therapy (APT), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), or antiplatelet therapy combined with anticoagulation lowers the rate of peripheral revascularization (relative risk [RR] 0.89; 95% confidence interval [0.83; 0.94]), amputation (RR 0.63; [0.46; 0.86]), and stroke (RR 0.82; [0.70; 0.97]) but raises the risk of bleeding (RR 1.23; [1.04; 1.44]). Pre - dictors for peripheral vascular events include critical limb ischemia and having previously undergone a revascularization procedure or an amputation. CONCLUSION: Antiplatelet therapy should only be intensified for a limited time, or if the risk of ischemia is high. Before and during intensified antiplatelet therapy, the risk of bleeding should be assessed and weighed against the risk of ischemia. No validated score is available to estimate the risk of hemorrhagic complications in patients with PAOD. New antithrombotic therapies should not be used indiscriminately, but should rather be reserved for selected groups of patients.

Diabetic foot syndrome in patients with diabetes. A multicenter German/Austrian DPV analysis on 33 870 patients.

AIMS: The diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) is a serious complication in patients with diabetes increasing the risk for minor/major amputations. This analysis aimed to examine differences in diabetes patients with or without DFS stratified by type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult patients (≥20y of age) with diabetes from the German/Austrian diabetes patients follow-up registry (DPV) were included. The cross-sectional study comprised 45 722 subjects with T1D (nDFS  = 2966) and 313 264 with T2D (nDFS  = 30 904). In DFS, minor/major amputations were analysed. To compare HbA1C , neuropathy, nephropathy, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and macrovascular complications between patients with or without DFS, regression models were conducted. Confounders: age, sex, diabetes duration. RESULTS: In patients with DFS, a minor amputation was documented in 27.2% (T1D) and 25.9% (T2D), a major amputation in 10.2% (T1D) and 11.3% (T2D). Regression models revealed that neuropathy was more frequent in subjects with DFS compared with patients without DFS (T1D: 70.7 vs 29.8%; T2D: 59.4% vs 36.9%; both P < 0.0001). Hypertension, nephropathy, peripheral vascular disease, stroke, or myocardial infarction was more common compared with patients without DFS (all P < 0.0001). In T1D with DFS, a slightly higher HbA1C (8.11% vs 7.95%; P < 0.0001) and in T2D with DFS a lower HbA1C (7.49% vs 7.69%; P < 0.0001) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: One third of the patients with DFS had an amputation of the lower extremity. Especially neuropathy or peripheral vascular disease was more prevalent in patients with DFS. New concepts to prevent DFS-induced amputations and to reduce cardiovascular risk factors before the occurrence of DFS are necessary.