Pacemaker failure caused by traveller's diarrhoea.

A female patient with a VVI pacemaker suffered from traveller's diarrhoea which she treated with tea and water. After the onset of arrhythmia a pacemaker failure and a sodium concentration of 117 mmol/l was found. After substitution of sodium chloride, there was a remission of symptoms, the pacemaker ECG was normal.

Cough and dyspnoea of an asthmatic patient at Mt. Kilimanjaro: a difficult differential diagnosis.

This case highlights the difficulties associated with the differential diagnosis of pulmonary symptoms in patients with pre-existing diseases in extreme environmental conditions. A 58-year-old man with child-onset allergic asthma developed dyspnoea and an acute non-productive cough during a trekking expedition on Mt. Kilimanjaro (5895m) in Tanzania. The symptoms were believed initially to be linked to the high altitude exposure (high altitude pulmonary oedema (HAPE) or high altitude cough) or his pre-existing asthma. However, he was later diagnosed correctly with a reinfection of Bordetella pertussis. Pertussis is a highly communicable disease with potentially serious medical consequences that could have affected all of the expedition members. The effectiveness of a pertussis vaccine declines 4-12 years after the vaccination. Thus, it is suggested that the status of immunisation against pertussis should be checked along with those of other infections prior to travel.

Sport climbing with pre-existing cardio-pulmonary medical conditions.

Over the past 25 years sport climbing has developed from an elite extreme sport subculture pursued by few into a mainstream recreational sport enjoyed globally by climbers of all ages, climbing abilities, and with pre-existing health conditions. As the demands and grades of climbing difficulty have increased over this period, most scientific literature on sport climbing focused on acute injuries and overuse syndromes, or performance physiology in healthy adult males. The physiological response to sport climbing is more similar to that of resistance training (i.e., body building) rather than a predominantly aerobic sport (i.e., running, cycling), so that heart rate and blood pressure during a climb will be disproportionately high relative to the 'exercise' of climbing, and breathing may be irregular. Therefore this review sought evidence-based recommendations for recreational sport climbing participation by those individuals with pre-existing cardiopulmonary medical conditions including coronary heart disease, chronic heart failure, cardiac dysrhythmia, pulmonary diseases (i.e., asthma) or hypertension. This review defines the criteria that must be fulfilled for safe sport climbing by those with pre-existing cardiopulmonary conditions or those with hypertension.

[Use of heparin in acute myocardial infarction in routine clinical practice in Germany. Results of the MITRA and MIR registries]. / Stellenwert des Heparins in der aktuellen Therapie des akuten Myokardinfarktes in Deutschland--Ergebnisse der MITRA- und MIR-Register.

OBJECTIVE: Among other adjunctive medication, heparin is widely used in the therapy of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) today. Large randomized trials, however, have shown inconclusive data on the benefit of adjunctive heparin therapy for patients with AMI. The aim of this study was to describe the use of heparin and complication rates in routine clinical practice today. METHODS: MITRA and MIR were multicenter registries of AMI patients in Germany. During the years 1994 to 1998, 22,697 patients were registered with MITRA and MIR. Of these patients 49.9% received reperfusion therapy. RESULTS: 21,004 patients (92%) received heparin during acute therapy of AMI. The following factors were associated with withholding heparin: Bleeding at admission (OR 4.7; CI 3.2-6.8), cardiogenic shock (OR 1.8; CI 1.4-2.3) and fibrinolytic therapy with streptokinase (OR 2.1; CI 1.8-2.3). Complication rates of patients with heparin were only slightly higher than among those without heparin: 1.7% strokes and 1.9% bleedings were reported among the patients with fibrinolysis and heparin compared to 1.3% strokes and 1.4% bleedings among patients without heparin (p = ns). Mortality rates were 14.1% for patients with and 27.3% for patients without heparin (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Of the patients in MITRA and MIR 92% received heparin during AMI. Patients with active bleeding or in critical condition received heparin significantly less often. The selection of critically ill patients may have contributed to the high mortality of patients without heparin for AMI. Bleeding complication rates of patients with adjunctive heparin were only slightly higher than reported in randomized trials.

[Not Available]. / Stellenwert des Heparins in der aktuellen Therapie des akuten Myokardinfarktes in Deutschland - Ergebnisse der MITRA- und MIR-Register.

Objective Among other adjunctive medication, heparin is widely used in the therapy of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) today. Large randomized trials, however, have shown inconclusive data on the benefit of adjunctive heparin therapy for patients with AMI. The aim of this study was to describe the use of heparin and complication rates in routine clinical practice today. Methods MITRA and MIR were multicenter registries of AMI patients in Germany. During the years 1994 to 1998, 22697 patients were registered with MITRA and MIR. Of these patients 49.9% received reperfusion therapy. Results 21004 patients (92%) received heparin during acute therapy of AMI. The following factors were associated with withholding heparin: Bleeding at admission (OR 4.7; CI 3.2-6.8), cardiogenic shock (OR 1.8; CI 1.4-2.3) and fibrinolytic therapy with streptokinase (OR 2.1; CI 1.8-2.3). Complication rates of patients with heparin were only slightly higher than among those without heparin: 1.7% strokes and 1.9% bleedings were reported among the patients with fibrinolysis and heparin compared to 1.3% strokes and 1.4% bleedings among patients without heparin (p=ns). Mortality rates were 14.1% for patients with and 27.3% for patients without heparin (p<0.001). Conclusions Of the patients in MITRA and MIR 92% received heparin during AMI. Patients with active bleeding or in critical condition received heparin significantly less often. The selection of critically ill patients may have contributed to the high mortality of patients without heparin for AMI. Bleeding complication rates of patients with adjunctive heparin were only sightly higher than reported in randomized trials.

Impact of prehospital delay on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis, longer times to treatment are associated with increasingly worse clinical outcome. This relation may be different for treatment with primary angioplasty. METHODS: We analyzed the pooled data of the German acute myocardial infarction registries Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) and Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR) to determine the influence of prehospital delays on hospital mortality rates. Primary angioplasty was performed in 1063 patients and thrombolysis in 7552 patients. RESULTS: In patients treated with thrombolysis, in-hospital time to treatment was constantly 30 minutes median. In patients treated with primary angioplasty, in-hospital time to treatment increased from 60 minutes median up to 87 minutes median with increasing prehospital delay. Hospital mortality rates slightly decreased with increasing prehospital delays in patients treated with primary angioplasty (P for trend =.02). However, in patients treated with thrombolysis, mortality rate was nonsignificantly increased (P for trend =.11). Logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference in mortality rates between primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for prehospital delays of <3 hours. However, when prehospital delay was >3 hours, thrombolysis was independently associated with a higher mortality rate compared with primary angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with thrombolysis, primary angioplasty is independently associated with a lower mortality rate in prehospital delays of >3 hours. The reason for this may be a time-dependent loss of efficacy to achieve reperfusion for thrombolysis but not for primary angioplasty.

Incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcome of stroke after acute myocardial infarction in clinical practice. MIR and MITRA Study Groups. Myocardial Infarction Registry. Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction .

In this analysis of ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 21,330 consecutively included patients with AMI, we found an incidence of stroke after AMI of 1.2% and a very poor prognosis. Previous stroke, atrial fibrillation, and older age were the strongest predictors of stroke after AMI; thrombolysis was a borderline risk factor and early therapy with aspirin was associated with a reduction in stroke after AMI.

Characterization and clinical course of patients not receiving aspirin for acute myocardial infarction: results from the MITRA and MIR studies.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have shown the efficacy of aspirin for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, not all patients receive aspirin for AMI. The aim of this study was to provide information on characteristics and clinical course of patients not treated with aspirin for AMI. METHODS: We analyzed the data of the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR) and the Maximal Individual Therapy of Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) registry. MITRA and MIR were prospective multicenter registries of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in Germany. RESULTS: Of 22,572 patients registered from 1994 to 1998, 1767 (7.8%) did not receive aspirin within the first 48 hours after admission. Multivariate analysis revealed two main factors associated with withholding aspirin for AMI: relative contraindications to aspirin (gastric ulcer [odds ratio (OR) 4.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-5.7], renal insufficiency [OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8]), and critical clinical state at admission (cardiogenic shock [OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.1] and prehospital resuscitation [OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.2]). In addition, these patients were significantly less likely to receive reperfusion therapy and adjunctive medical therapy such as beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. In-hospital mortality after adjustment for baseline characteristics was 27.2% in patients without aspirin compared with 11.1% in patients treated with aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority of AMI patients (7.8%) did not receive aspirin. Relative contraindications to aspirin and a critical clinical state at admission were the main factors associated with withholding aspirin for AMI. Even after adjustment for patient characteristics, the mortality of patients without aspirin was almost three times higher.

[Use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction in Germany: a comparison of daily clinical practice with international guidelines. MITRA Study]. / Indikationsstellung zur Herzkatheteruntersuchung nach akutem Myokardinfarkt in Deutschland: Klinische Praxis vs. Richtlinien. MITRA-Studie.

OBJECTIVES: Two third of patients with acute myocardial infarction are admitted to hospitals without cardiac catheterization facilities. Whether a postinfarction patient will undergo cardiac catheterization or not is more often decided by general physicians than by cardiologists. The purpose of this presentation is to investigate the determinants for decision making to use cardiac catheterization in patients after myocardial infarction. METHODS: MITRA is a prospective, multicenter registry, which enrolls all consecutive patients with acute Q wave infarction admitted to 54 hospitals in Southwestern Germany. During the pilot phase 949 consecutive survivors of acute myocardial infarction were included, and inhospital outcome as well as therapeutic strategies were registered. RESULTS: Only half of the patients underwent cardiac catheterization regardless of whether a catheterization facility was available or not. In 63% of the patients under 65 years of age coronary angiography was performed; however, every fourth patient with age above 70 years was transferred to an invasive therapeutic strategy. The percentage of male patients was twice a high in the invasive group, whereas patients with prior infarction, clinical signs of congestive heart failure, patients with moderately or severely impaired left ventricular function, and finally patients with a prehospital delay of more than 4 hours were more frequent in the conservative group. The following three parameters were calculated to be independent determinants of an invasive strategy: pathological stress ECG (OR: 2.8; CI: 1.80-4.60), patients < 70 years without stress ECG (OR: 2.18; CI: 1.5-3.18), and male gender (OR: 1.45: CI: 1.10-2.00). Independent factors of a conservative strategy were primary PTCA (OR: 0.2; CI: 0.09-0.46), prehospital delay > 4 hours (OR: 0.71; CI: 0.51-0.97), and the combination of age > 70 years and the absence of a stress ECG (OR: 0.78; CI: 0.55-1.11). CONCLUSIONS: In Germany, patients with acute myocardial infarction are less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization compared to patients in other Western countries (e.g. , the United States). Despite recommended guidelines, invasive strategies are more frequent in low risk groups (younger patients, male gender) than in postinfarction patients at high risk (severely impaired left ventricular function, clinical signs of congestive heart failure, the elderly).

Comparison of primary angioplasty with conservative therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction and contraindications for thrombolytic therapy. Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group.

The benefit of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and contraindications for thrombolysis compared to a conservative regimen is still unclear. Out of 5,869 patients with AMI registered by the MITRA trial, 337 (5.7%) patients had at least one strong contraindication for thrombolytic therapy. Out of these 337 patients 46 (13.6%) were treated with primary angioplasty and 276 (86.4%) were treated conservatively. Patients treated conservatively were older (70 years vs. 60 years; P=0.001), had a higher rate of a history with chronic heart failure (14.8% vs. 4.4%; P=0.053), a higher heart rate at admission (86 beats/min vs. 74 beats/min; P=0.001), and a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (27.1% vs. 12.8%; P=0.056). Patients treated with primary angioplasty received more often aspirin (91.3% vs. 74.6%; P=0.012), beta-blockers (60.9% vs. 46.1%; P = 0.062), angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (71.7% vs. 44%; P=0.001), and the so-called optimal adjunctive medication (54.4% vs. 32.3%; P=0.004). Hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients who received primary angioplasty (univariate: 2.2% vs. 24.7%; P=0.001; multivariate: OR=0.46; P=0.0230). In patients with AMI and contraindications for thrombolytic therapy, primary angioplasty was associated with a significantly lower mortality compared to conservative treatment. Therefore, hospitals without the facilities to perform primary angioplasty should try to refer such patients to centers with the facilities for such a service, if this is possible in an acceptable time.

Differences in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy. Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the differences in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with primary angioplasty or intravenous thrombolysis in clinical practice. METHODS: In all, 5,906 patients with AMI were registered by the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) study. Of these, 491 (8.3%) patients were treated with primary angioplasty and 2,817 (47.7%) with intravenous thrombolysis. RESULTS: There were only minor differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Prehospital delay time (median) was longer in the angioplasty group than in the thrombolysis group (161 vs. 120, p = 0.001), as was door-to-treatment time (88 vs. 30 min; p = 0.001). Patients treated with primary angioplasty more often had contraindications for thrombolytic therapy (12.9 vs. 6%, p = 0.001) and received beta blockers (65 vs. 58.1%, p = 0.004), heparin (98.2 vs. 91.6%, p = 0.001), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (64.8 vs. 50%, p = 0.001) and "optimal" concomitant medication (56.4 vs. 42.9%, p = 0.001) more often. Univariate analysis showed a significant lower incidence of heart failure (5.3 vs. 16.5%, p = 0.001), postinfarct angina (7.3 vs. 16.4%, p = 0.001), in-hospital death (7.9 vs. 11.7%, p = 0.015) and the combined end point (21.6 vs. 40.3%, p = 0.001) in these patients. Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed optimal concomitant medication [odds ratio (OR) = 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.98) and the type of revascularization (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.58-0.73) to be associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of the combined end point. Similar results were obtained in all predefined subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, patients treated with primary angioplasty are more often treated with beta blockers and ACE inhibitors than patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Thus, the selection of patients and the type of revascularization contributes to the reduction in mortality, overt heart failure, and postinfarct angina in these patients.

[Early treatment of acute myocardial infarct: implementation of therapy guidelines in routine clinical practice, MITRA pilot phase]. / Frühbehandlung des akuten Myokardinfarktes: Umsetzung von Therapierichtlinien in den klinischen Alltag, MITRA-Pilotphase.

The prognostic value of thrombolytics, aspirin, beta-blockers and ACE-inhibitors has been well documented in large clinical trials, but the application of these drugs in clinical practice is not known. MITRA is a multicenter study of 54 hospitals in a defined region in southwest Germany. The aim is to document actual clinical practice (pilot phase) and to establish an individually optimised prognostic therapy for acute myocardial infarction, considering only the absolute contraindications for each drug. In the pilot phase, 1303 consecutive patients with acute transmural myocardial infarction were enrolled. The median age was 66 years, the prehospital time was 2.7 hours. 47% had an anterior infarction. In the subgroup of patients without absolute contraindications, only 53.4% were treated with thrombolytics, 87.6% with aspirin, 37.1% with beta-blocker, and 17.4% with ACE-inhibitor. Out of these, patients were classified as "optimally treated" if they received thrombolysis, aspirin as well as beta-blocker. Patients were also included if any of these medications was withheld in the presence of absolute contraindications. Treatment was defined suboptimal, if the patients did not receive any of these three medications despite the absence of absolute contraindications. Only 29% (n = 383) received an optimal post-infarction therapy and 71% (n = 775) a suboptimal treatment. The univariate analysis revealed 10 variables influencing optimal therapy. In this subgroup patients were younger, they more often had clear ECG-findings or left bundle branch block, an anterior infarction, acute cardiac failure, AV-block, bradycardia, recent trauma or surgery (less then 2 weeks) and a severe chronic obstructive lung disease. The prehospital time was more often available. Early mortality after 2 days was 5.0% versus 9.3% in the suboptimal treated patients (OR: 0.5, CI: 0.30-0.86) the total inhospital mortality was 10.9% in the optimal versus 17.7% in the suboptimal group (OR: 0.6, CI: 0.38-0.84). In a multivariate analysis the parameter "optimal treatment" was found to be an independent predictor of the early (OR = 0.4; CI: 0.20-0.69) and the inhospital mortality (OR = 0.4; CI: 0.25-0.64). The following in-hospital events occurred: stroke 2.8%, reinfarction 12.9%, cardiac failure 21.5%, cardiogenic shock 10.4% and in-hospital mortality 18.1% (2-days mortality 9.5%). Pharmacological therapy for acute myocardial infarction is inconsistent with the recommendations suggested in recent clinical trials and needs to be individually optimised. Optimal treatment is an independent predictor of early and inhospital mortality.

[Left bundle-branch block and primary benign heart tumor]. / Linksschenkelblock und primärer benigner Herztumor.

The electrocardiogram (ECG) of a 56-year-old woman suffering from insomnia and nervousness revealed left bundle branch block, an ECG two years previously having been normal. Echocardiography showed a perimyocardial space-occupying lesion in the area of the left ventricle. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a 6 x 6 x 7 cm solid tumour, which could not be separated from the myocardium of the dorsal portion of the ventricle and the left atrial wall. Coronary angiography demonstrated a few small atypical vessels originating from the right coronary artery. An endomyocardial biopsy was equivocal. An exploratory thoracotomy revealed a large, livid tumour which could not be resected because it involved a large area of the left ventricle and left atrium. Surgical biopsy showed a cavernous haemangioma. The subsequent course (ten months' follow-up) has so far been unremarkable.