Diagnostic Accuracy of Raman Spectroscopy Integrated With Polarized Light Microscopy for Calcium Pyrophosphate-Associated Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: We studied the performance of integrated Raman polarized light microscopy (iRPolM) for the identification of calcium pyrophosphate (CPP)-associated arthritis (CPPD). METHODS: This is a diagnostic accuracy study including 400 consecutive synovial fluid samples from a single hospital in the Netherlands. Accuracy measures were calculated against polarized light microscopy (PLM) and the 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR criteria set for CPPD. RESULTS: The interrater reliability between iRPolM and the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria set for CPPD was strong (κ = 0.88). The diagnostic performance of iRPolM compared to the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria set was sensitivity 86.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 73.3-94.2), specificity 99.1% (95% CI 97.5-99.8), positive likelihood ratio 100.33 (95% CI 32.3-311.3), negative likelihood ratio 0.14 (95% CI 0.07-0.28), positive predictive value 93.5% (95% CI 82.2-97.8), negative predictive value 98.0% (95% CI 82.2-97.8), and accuracy 97.5% (95% CI 95.5-98.8). We allowed rheumatologists to rate the certainty of their microscopic identification of CPP and found a large correspondence between iRPolM and a certain identification (κ = 0.87), whereas only 10% of the uncertain CPP identifications could be confirmed with iRPolM. We identified several novel particle types in synovial fluid analysis, including calcium carbonate crystals, deposited carotenoids, microplastics, and three types of Maltese cross birefringent objects. CONCLUSION: iRPolM can easily identify CPP crystals with a strong diagnostic performance. PLM alone is not specific enough to reliably resolve complicated cases, and the implementation of Raman spectroscopy in rheumatology practice can be of benefit to patients with suspected CPPD.

Test characteristics of Raman spectroscopy integrated with polarized light microscopy for the diagnosis of acute gouty arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: We studied the performance of Raman spectroscopy integrated with polarized light microscopy (iRPolM) as a next-generation technique for synovial fluid analysis in gout. METHODS: This is a prospective study, including consecutive synovial fluid samples drawn from any peripheral swollen joint. Diagnostic accuracy was compared to the 2015 ACR/EULAR Gout classification criteria as a reference test and to polarized light microscopy (PLM) analysis by a rheumatologist. Synovial fluid was analysed with iRPolM after unblinding the PLM results. RESULTS: Two hundred unselected consecutive patient samples were included in this study. Validation against clinical criteria: 67 patients were classified as gout according to 2015 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Compared to the 2015 ACR/EULAR gout classification criteria, iRPolM had a sensitivity of 77.6% (95% CI: 65.8-86.9), specificity of 97.7% (95% CI: 93.5-99.5), positive predictive value (PPV) of 94.5% (95% CI: 84.9-98.2), negative predictive value (NPV) of 89.7% (95% CI: 84.7-93.1), an accuracy of 91.0% (95% CI: 86.2-94.6), a positive likelihood ratio of 34.4 (95% CI: 11.16-106.10) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.23 (95% CI: 0.15-0.36). Validation against PLM: 55 samples were positive for MSU according to PLM. The interrater agreement between PLM and iRPolM was near perfect (к=0.90). The sensitivity of iRPolM to identify MSU in PLM-positive samples was 91.2% (95% CI: 80.7-97.1), the specificity was 97.6% (95% CI: 93.0-99.5), the PPV was 94.6% (95% CI: 85.0-98.2), NPV was 96.0% (95% CI: 91.2-98.2) and the accuracy was 95.6% (95% CI: 91.4-98.2). The positive likelihood ratio was 37.4 (95% CI: 12.20-114.71), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.04-0.21). CONCLUSION: iRPolM is a promising next-generation diagnostic tool for rheumatology by diagnosing gout with high specificity, increased objectivity, and a sensitivity comparable to PLM.

Erosive Hand OsteoArthritis (EHOA): analysis of consecutive patients presenting with EHOA in a hospital-based rheumatology practice and its implications for an upcoming interventional study.

INTRODUCTION: Erosive Hand OsteoArthritis (EHOA) is a common rheumatological problem. We aim to determine characteristics of EHOA patients: comorbidities, radiographic erosivity and pain experienced after being diagnosed, in order to find which of these are potentially relevant in upcoming interventional trials. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of EHOA patients within the electronic database in one centre, with a telephone interview on pain as experienced even exceeding 12 months after being diagnosed. RESULTS: Eighty-four non-academic EHOA patients were found: 89% females (median age 69 years), 11% males (similar age distribution). Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) erosivity scores in both sexes were comparable; DIPs scored higher than PIP's. Comorbid conditions were crystal-induced arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 8%, 5% and 1%, respectively; seropositivity for rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in 8% and 1% respectively. Pain worst experienced often exceeded a visual analogue score of 5.0, but was unrelated to the total KL score. Some pain reduction was reached with non-steroidals (perorally/transcutaneously) as deduced from continued use in 1 in 3. CONCLUSIONS: In many EHOA patients, there is an unmet need regarding the treatment of pain, which per se was not directly correlated with erosivity score. Future studies may be designed considering the aforementioned characteristics, acting on the inflammatory process resulting in PIP/DIP erosions, with the exclusion of RA and PsA in order to get a clean study on EHOA. Several studies with monoclonal antibodies have been performed but demonstrated ineffectivity on the outcome of pain. Hope glooms with the arrival of innovative small molecules that may reach EHOA target cells. Key Points • Erosive handOA is a common problem in non-academic rheumatology; it is often associated with significant pain in both sexes exceeding a VASpain of 5.0 even years after being diagnosed; 1 in 3 found some relief in non-steroidals perorally/transcutaneously. • Future studies will have to focus on (episodic) inflammatory hand OA resulting in proven erosivity (EHOA) located in PIP plus DIP joints and may have to exclude comorbid active crystal-induced arthritis as well as rheumatoid/psoriatic arthritis and possibly even RF/ACPA seropositivity in order to get a clean study on EHOA. • As several big monoclonals have failed in EHOA, we may have to search for promising new drugs within the group of small molecules. These will have to show a significant pain-reducing effect and preferably also a disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) effect.