Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of BI 685509, a soluble guanylyl cyclase activator, in healthy volunteers: Results from two randomized controlled trials.

This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of BI 685509 after oral single rising doses (SRDs) or multiple rising doses (MRDs) in healthy volunteers. In the SRD trial (NCT02694354; February 29, 2016), within each of the three dose groups (DGs), six subjects received BI 685509 (1.0, 2.5, or 5.0 mg) and two received placebo (N = 24). In the MRD trial (NCT03116906; April 17, 2017), within each of the five DGs, nine subjects received BI 685509 (uptitrated to 1 mg once daily [qd; DG1], 2.5 mg twice daily [DG2], 5.0 mg qd [DG3]; 3.0 mg three times daily [tid; DG4] or 4.0 mg tid [DG5]) and three received placebo, for 14-17 days (N = 60). In the SRD trial, 7/24 subjects (29.2%) had ≥ 1 adverse event (AE), most frequently orthostatic dysregulation (n = 4). In the MRD trial, 26/45 subjects (57.8%) receiving BI 685509 had ≥ 1 AE, most frequently orthostatic dysregulation and fatigue (each n = 12). Tolerance development led to a marked decrease in orthostatic dysregulation events (DG3). BI 685509 was rapidly absorbed after oral administration, and exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner after single doses. Multiple dosing resulted in near-dose-proportional increase in exposure and limited accumulation. BI 685509 pharmacokinetics appeared linear with time; steady state occurred 3-5 days after each multiple-dosing period. Increased plasma cyclic guanosine monophosphate and decreased blood pressure followed by a compensatory increase in heart rate indicated target engagement. BI 685509 was generally well tolerated; orthostatic dysregulation may be appropriately countered by careful uptitration.

Application of In Vivo Imaging Techniques and Diagnostic Tools in Oral Drug Delivery Research.

Drug absorption following oral administration is determined by complex and dynamic interactions between gastrointestinal (GI) physiology, the drug, and its formulation. Since many of these interactions are not fully understood, the COST action on "Understanding Gastrointestinal Absorption-related Processes (UNGAP)" was initiated in 2017, with the aim to improve the current comprehension of intestinal drug absorption and foster future developments in this field. In this regard, in vivo techniques used for the characterization of human GI physiology and the intraluminal behavior of orally administered dosage forms in the GI tract are fundamental to gaining deeper mechanistic understanding of the interplay between human GI physiology and drug product performance. In this review, the potential applications, advantages, and limitations of the most important in vivo techniques relevant to oral biopharmaceutics are presented from the perspectives of different research fields.

Validation of a Drug Transporter Probe Cocktail Using the Prototypical Inhibitors Rifampin, Probenecid, Verapamil, and Cimetidine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A novel cocktail containing four substrates of key drug transporters was previously optimized to eliminate mutual drug-drug interactions between the probes digoxin (P-glycoprotein substrate), furosemide (organic anion transporter 1/3), metformin (organic cation transporter 2, multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1/2-K), and rosuvastatin (organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1/3, breast cancer resistance protein). This clinical trial investigated the effects of four commonly employed drug transporter inhibitors on cocktail drug pharmacokinetics. METHODS: In a randomized open-label crossover trial in 45 healthy male subjects, treatment groups received the cocktail with or without single oral doses of rifampin, verapamil, cimetidine or probenecid. Concentrations of the probe drugs in serial plasma samples and urine fractions were measured by validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assays to assess systemic exposure. RESULTS: The results were generally in accordance with known in vitro and/or clinical drug-drug interaction data. Single-dose rifampin increased rosuvastatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-tz) by 248% and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) by 1025%. Probenecid increased furosemide AUC0-tz by 172% and Cmax by 23%. Cimetidine reduced metformin renal clearance by 26%. The effect of single-dose verapamil on digoxin systemic exposure was less than expected from multiple-dose studies (AUC0-tz unaltered, Cmax + 22%). CONCLUSIONS: Taking all the interaction results together, the transporter cocktail is considered to be validated as a sensitive and specific tool for evaluating transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions in drug development. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number 2017-001549-29.

Optimization of a drug transporter probe cocktail: potential screening tool for transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions.

AIMS: Previous pharmacokinetic characterization of a transporter probe cocktail containing digoxin (P-gp), furosemide (OAT1, OAT3), metformin (OCT2, MATE1, MATE2-K) and rosuvastatin (OATP1B1, OATP1B3, BCRP) in healthy subjects showed increases in rosuvastatin systemic exposure compared to rosuvastatin alone. In this trial, the doses of metformin and furosemide as putative perpetrators were reduced to eliminate their drug-drug interaction (DDI) with rosuvastatin. METHODS: In a randomized, open-label, single-centre, five-treatment, five-period crossover trial, 30 healthy male subjects received as reference treatments separately 0.25 mg digoxin, 1 mg furosemide, 10 mg metformin and 10 mg rosuvastatin, and as test treatment all four drugs administered together as a cocktail. Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were AUC0-tz (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration) and Cmax (maximum plasma concentration) of each probe drug. RESULTS: Geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of test (cocktail) to reference (single drug) for AUC0-tz were 96.4% (88.2-105.3%) for digoxin, 102.6% (93.8-112.3%) for furosemide, 97.5% (93.5-101.6%) for metformin and 105.0% (96.4-114.4%) for rosuvastatin, indicating lack of interaction. The same analysis for Cmax and for pharmacokinetic parameters of urinary excretion of all cocktail components also indicated no DDI. CONCLUSIONS: Digoxin (0.25 mg), furosemide (1 mg), metformin (10 mg) and rosuvastatin (10 mg) exhibit no mutual pharmacokinetic interactions and are well tolerated administered as a cocktail. The cocktail is thus optimized and has the potential to be used as a screening tool for clinical investigation of transporter-mediated DDI.

Effects of Metformin and Furosemide on Rosuvastatin Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Volunteers: Implications for Their Use as Probe Drugs in a Transporter Cocktail.

BACKGROUND: In a recently described probe drug cocktail for clinically relevant drug transporters containing digoxin, furosemide, metformin and rosuvastatin, mutual interactions were essentially absent except for increases in the systemic exposure of rosuvastatin. To optimize the cocktail, we further examined the dose dependence of the effects of metformin and furosemide on rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics. METHODS: This was a randomized, open label, single center, six-treatment, six-period, six-sequence crossover trial. Eighteen healthy male subjects received 10 mg rosuvastatin as reference treatment and, as test treatments, 10 mg rosuvastatin combined with 10, 50 or 500 mg metformin (T1, T2 and T3) or with 1 or 5 mg furosemide (T4 and T5). Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were rosuvastatin C max (maximum plasma concentration) and AUC0-tz (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration). RESULTS: The relative bioavailability of rosuvastatin was essentially unchanged when administered with metformin in T1 and T2, but in T3 it increased to 152% for AUC0-tz (90% CI 135-171%) and 154% for C max (90% CI 132-180%). Coadministration with furosemide did not change rosuvastatin relative bioavailability in T4, but in T5 it increased slightly to 116% for AUC0-tz (90% CI 102-132%) and 118% for C max (90% CI 98-142%). CONCLUSION: The increased systemic exposure of rosuvastatin when administered as part of the proposed transporter cocktail is most likely attributable to metformin and only to a minor degree to furosemide. Reduction of the doses of metformin and furosemide is expected to eliminate the previously described interaction. EudraCT no. 2015-003052-46, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02574845.

Investigation of the effect of food and omeprazole on the relative bioavailability of a single oral dose of 240 mg faldaprevir, a selective inhibitor of HCV NS3/4 protease, in an open-label, randomized, three-way cross-over trial in healthy participants.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to investigate the effect of food and coadministration of omeprazole on the relative bioavailability (BA) of faldaprevir (FDV). METHODS: Fifteen healthy participants participated in this open-label, randomized, three-way cross-over study. Faldaprevir was administered as a 240 mg single dose during fasting state, following intake of a high-fat breakfast, or following omeprazole 40 mg q.d. dosing for 5 days. PK samples were collected on the day of faldaprevir administration. KEY FINDINGS: We found geometric mean (gMean) AUC0-∞ values for faldaprevir of 48 200, 37 900 and 36 000 ng h/ml under the fed, fasted and omeprazole coadministration conditions respectively. Similarly, gMean Cmax values for faldaprevir were 2600, 2030, 1920 ng/ml under the same respective conditions. The adjusted gMean ratio between the fed and fasted condition was approximately 120% for both AUC0-∞ and Cmax , while the ratio of omeprazole coadministration to fasted condition was approximately 94%. Faldaprevir was safe and well tolerated in the study. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of a single dose of 240 mg faldaprevir after high-fat breakfast led to a modest, clinically irrelevant increase in faldaprevir exposure, while coadministration of omeprazole did not influence faldaprevir exposure.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of afatinib with rifampicin and ritonavir.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Afatinib is a potent, irreversible, ErbB family blocker in clinical development for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic head and neck cancer, and other solid tumours. As afatinib is a substrate for the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) pump transporter the three studies presented here investigated the pharmacokinetics of afatinib in the presence of a potent inhibitor (ritonavir) or inducer [rifampicin (rifampin)] of P-gp. METHODS: We conducted phase I, open-label, single-centre studies in healthy male volunteers who received a single once-daily oral dose of afatinib (20 or 40 mg) together with either ritonavir or rifampicin; two studies had a randomised, two- and three-way crossover design and the third was a non-randomised, two-period sequential study. RESULTS: When afatinib 20 mg was administered 1 h after ritonavir, afatinib geometric mean (gMean) maximum plasma concentration (C max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) increased by 38.5 and 47.6 %, respectively. Coadministration of ritonavir either simultaneously or 6 h later than afatinib 40 mg resulted in minimal increase in the afatinib gMean C max and AUC∞ (4.1 and 18.6 % for simultaneous administration with AUC∞ not completely within the bioequivalence limits; 5.1 and 10.8 % for timed administration within the bioequivalence limits). Administration of afatinib 40 mg in the presence of rifampicin led to reduction in C max and AUC∞ by 21.6 and 33.8 %, respectively. In all studies, P-gp modulation mainly affected the extent of absorption of afatinib; there was no change in the terminal elimination half-life. The overall safety profile of afatinib was acceptable. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of potent P-gp modulators had no clinically relevant effect on afatinib exposure. Effects of potent P-gp inhibitors were minimal at higher afatinib doses and can be readily managed by the timing of concomitant therapy. As afatinib is not a relevant modulator or substrate of cytochrome P450 enzymes, the drug-drug interaction potential is considered to be low.

Relative bioavailability and pharmacodynamic effects of methantheline compared with atropine in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVES: Methantheline is a strong muscarinic receptor blocking drug used in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome, hypersalivation and hyperhidrosis. To provide basic information on the pharmacokinetics, magnitude of pharmacodynamic (PD) effects and their correlations with plasma concentrations, we performed a clinical study in 12 healthy subjects receiving methantheline as immediate-release coated tablets (IR) or in watery solution (SOL) in comparison with atropine and placebo tablets. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics and influence of methantheline, atropine and placebo on salivation and accommodation and pupil function (pupillometry: diameter, response to light flash) were studied in a randomized, controlled study after the administration of 100 mg methantheline bromide as IR and in SOL (phase 1) and 1.0 mg atropine sulphate and placebo (phase 2). RESULTS: Methantheline reached maximum plasma concentrations of approximately 25 ng/ml after 2.5-3 h and was eliminated at an apparent half-life of approximately 2 h. There was no pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence of methantheline IR and SOL. The ratio IR/SOL (90 % confidence interval) were 0.892 (0.532-1.493) for AUC(0-∞) and 0.905 (0.516-1.584) for maximum plasma concentration. The PD effects of both forms were nearly equivalent with a IR/SOL ratio of 1.015 (0.815-1.262) for salivation, which is the most susceptible characteristic. Methantheline reduced salivation at a potency (methantheline concentration at half maximum effects, EC50) of 5.5 ng/ml in accordance with it plasma concentration. The antimuscarinic effects observed after methantheline administration were stronger and persisted longer than those following the administration of atropine. CONCLUSIONS: Methantheline is slowly absorbed but rapidly eliminated in humans, and it exerts a strong effect on salivation which is closely associated with its plasma concentrations following a standard sigmoid PD model. Immediate-release tablets and a watery solution of methantheline are equivalent in terms of major PD effects (salivation, pupil function, heart rate) despite its high PK variability.

A randomized, open-label, crossover study evaluating the effect of food on the relative bioavailability of linagliptin in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the relative bioavailability of the dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor linagliptin when administered with and without food, in accordance with regulatory requirements to support dosing recommendations for patients. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, crossover study involving 32 healthy white male and female subjects. All subjects received a single dose of 5 mg linagliptin after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours, or immediately after ingestion of a high-fat, high-calorie breakfast. These treatments were separated by a period of 5 weeks. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected before dosing and at prespecified time points after dosing. The concentration of linagliptin in these samples was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Relative bioavailability was assessed by the total area under the curve between 0 and 72 hours (AUC(0-72)) and maximum measured plasma concentration (C(max)) of linagliptin. Tolerability was also assessed. RESULTS: In 32 subjects (mean age, 34.8 years; weight, 74.3 kg; male, 53%; white race, 100%), intake of a high-fat meal resulted in comparable bioavailability with regard to AUC(0-72) (geometric mean ratio [GMR] between the fed and fasted group means was 103.5%; 90% CI, 98.1%-109.2%). Individuals' responses to food ranged from a maximum increase in exposure of 38% to a decrease of 32% relative to the fasted state. The concurrent intake of food increased the time to reach maximum plasma concentration (T(max)) by approximately 2 hours and reduced C(max) by about 15% (GMR 84.7%; 90% CI, 75.9%-94.6%). Since adequate drug exposure for inhibition of DPP-4 was still given for the entire 24-hour dosing interval, this result was considered to be of no clinical relevance. Linagliptin was well tolerated during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Intake of a high-fat meal reduced the rate of linagliptin absorption but had no influence on the extent of absorption; this finding suggests that food has no relevant influence on the efficacy of linagliptin.

Effect of multiple oral doses of linagliptin on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive in healthy female adults: an open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence, multiple-dose study.

BACKGROUND: Linagliptin is an oral dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor that has been recently approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Microgynon® 30 is a combined oral contraceptive pill containing both ethinylestradiol 30 µg and levonorgestrel 150 µg (EE 30 µg/LNG 150 µg). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of multiple doses of linagliptin (5 mg once daily) on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of EE and LNG following once-daily doses of EE 30 µg/LNG 150 µg. METHODS: This was an open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence, multiple-dose study, consisting of a run-in period, a 14-day reference treatment period and a 7-day test treatment period. The study recruited 18 healthy pre-menopausal female subjects aged 18-40 years with a body mass index of 18.5-27.0 kg/m2. Only women with regular menstrual cycles were included in this study. The treatment sequence was divided into three steps: an individually tailored run-in period with EE 30 µg/LNG 150 µg to synchronize the menstrual cycles of the subjects followed by a washout period of 7 days; the reference treatment period, during which EE 30 µg/LNG 150 µg alone was taken on days 1-14; and the test treatment period, during which EE 30 µg/LNG 150 µg plus linagliptin were taken on days 15-21. The pharmacokinetic parameters measured were maximum steady-state plasma concentration during a dosage interval (C(max,ss)), time to reach maximum plasma concentration following administration at steady state (t(max,ss)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosage interval (τ) at steady state (AUC(τ,ss)). RESULTS: The AUC(τ,ss) and C(max,ss) of EE and LNG were comparable when EE 30 µg/LNG 150 µg was given alone or combined with linagliptin. The adjusted geometric mean ratios for AUC(τ,ss) and C(max,ss) of EE following EE 30 µg/LNG 150 µg plus linagliptin versus EE 30 µg/LNG 150 µg alone were 101.4 (90% CI 97.2, 105.8) and 107.8 (90% CI 99.7, 116.6), respectively. The adjusted geometric mean ratios for AUC(τ,ss) and C(max,ss) of LNG following EE 30 µg/LNG 150 µg plus linagliptin versus EE 30 µg/LNG 150 µg alone were 108.8 (90% CI 104.5, 113.3) and 113.5 (90% CI 106.1, 121.3), respectively. The combination was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Linagliptin had no clinically relevant effect on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of EE and LNG in healthy female subjects, and the combination of EE 30 µg/LNG 150 µg and linagliptin was well tolerated in this study. Therefore, linagliptin has the potential to be used in the treatment of female patients with type 2 diabetes in combination with oral contraceptives containing these components, such as EE 30 µg/LNG 150 µg. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The EudraCT number for this study is 2008-000953-37.

Oral absorption of propiverine solution and of the immediate and extended release dosage forms: influence of regioselective intestinal elimination.

PURPOSE: The muscarine receptor antagonist propiverine in immediate release tablet form (IR) undergoes presystemic elimination mediated by CYP450 enzymes and intestinal efflux transporters. The aim of our study with propiverine IR and extended release (ER) was to determine whether propiverine disposition is dose linear, to compare the pharmacokinetics of propiverine in oral solution with IR and ER and to show how absorption rate is associated with bioavailability. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of propiverine administered as intravenous propiverine (15 mg), 10, 15, and 30 mg propiverine IR, an oral propiverine solution (15 mg) and 10, 15, 30, and 45 mg propiverine ER were measured in two randomized, controlled, single-dose, five-period, cross-over studies, with each case involving a study cohort of ten healthy Caucasian subjects. RESULTS: Disposition of propiverine IR and ER was not dose-related. The bioavailability of ER was 64.5 +/- 16.1% compared to 50.3 +/- 13.4% (non-significant) after administration of the IR and propiverine solution (42.6 +/- 14.8%, p < 0.05). The mean absorption time (MAT) of ER (14.2 +/- 4.79 h) was significantly longer than that of the solution and IR (3.94 +/- 4.14 and 0.38 +/- 3.79 h, respectively; both p < 0.05). The bioavailability of propiverine was significantly correlated to the MAT (r = 0.521, p < 0.001). Renal excretion of the metabolite M-23 after propiverine ER administration (6.7 +/- 2.7%) was significantly lower than that after administration of the oral solution (10 +/- 2.2%) and of IR (9.8 +/- 2.7%; both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The bioavailability of propiverine appears to be dependent on the intestinal site of dissolution and, consequently, on the extent of presystemic intestinal elimination.

Disposition of ezetimibe is influenced by polymorphisms of the hepatic uptake carrier OATP1B1.

OBJECTIVES: Genetic variability in hepatic uptake was recently shown to influence the disposition and cholesterol-lowering effects of statins. Ezetimibe, an inhibitor of the intestinal cholesterol uptake protein Niemann-Pick C 1 like 1, is another drug for which genetic polymorphisms of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) are expected to be of clinical relevance because ezetimibe undergoes intensive enterohepatic circulation for which hepatic uptake transporters may be rate-limiting determinants. METHODS: Using OATP1B3-, OATP2B1-, and OATP1B1-transfected HEK cells, including the OATP1B1 variants OATP1B1*1b and OATP1B1*5, we measured the uptake of ezetimibe and its glucuronide and we analyzed the competition with the common OATP-substrate bromosulfophthalein. Disposition and sterol-lowering effects of 20-mg ezetimibe were measured in 35 healthy participants genotyped for OATP1B1, ABCB1, ABCC2, and UGT1A1. RESULTS: Ezetimibe glucuronide inhibited bromosulfophthalein uptake in all OATP-transfected cells (50% inhibitory concentration (IC50): 0.14-0.26 mumol/l) whereas ezetimibe was 30-100 times less potent. Only the glucuronide was accumulated significantly in cells expressing OATP1B1 and OATP2B1. Its uptake in cells expressing OATP1B1*1b and *5 was reduced. In-vivo studies showed there was a gene-dose-dependent decrease in the area under the curve of ezetimibe in participants with the OATP1B1*1b protein (*1a/*1a, N=12, 112+/-66 ngxh/ml vs. *1a/*1b, N=8, 88+/-39 ngxh/ml vs. *1b/*1b, N=5, 55+/-18 ngxh/ml; Jonkheere-Terpstra, P=0.041) and a tendency for increased glucuronide exposure (704+/-296 vs. 878+/-369 vs. 1059+/-363 ngxh/ml; P=0.092). Fecal ezetimibe excretion was significantly decreased whereas renal glucuronide excretion was increased in carriers of *1b/*1b. Fecal excretion was also diminished in carriers of OATP1B1*5 and *15. The sterol-lowering effect of ezetimibe was not influenced by OATP1B1 polymorphisms. CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetics of ezetimibe is influenced by OATP1B1 polymorphisms in healthy participants after single dose administration.

Irregular absorption profiles observed from diclofenac extended release tablets can be predicted using a dissolution test apparatus that mimics in vivo physical stresses.

The prediction of the in vivo drug release characteristics of modified release oral dosage forms by in vitro dissolution tests is a prerequisite for successful product development. A novel dissolution test apparatus that mimics the physical conditions experienced by an oral formulation during gastrointestinal transit was developed. This included the simulation of pressure forces exerted by gut wall motility, shear forces generated during propagation, and loss of water contact when the dosage form is located in an intestinal air pocket. The new apparatus was evaluated using a diclofenac extended release (ER) tablet. The in vitro dissolution profiles were compared between the novel test apparatus and a conventional dissolution apparatus (USP II). These data were compared with the profiles of plasma concentration versus time that were obtained after the administration of an ER tablet to 24 healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. Multiple peaks were observed in individual plasma concentration-time profiles after the intake of the reference ER tablet. Standard dissolution testing showed typical characteristics of an almost continuous release for this formulation; however, dissolution testing with the novel apparatus suggested that the diclofenac release from the ER tablets would be extremely variable and dependent on the applied stress. The data suggest that the observed multiple peaks of plasma concentration after dosing of the ER diclofenac tablets are most probably caused by sensitivity to physical stress events during gastrointestinal transit.

Disposition and antimuscarinic effects of the urinary bladder spasmolytics propiverine: influence of dosage forms and circadian-time rhythms.

Propiverine extended release is expected to be better tolerated compared to immediate release tablets because of slower drug release and reduced formation of active metabolites in the colon. CYP3A4 and ABCC2, the major variables in pharmacokinetics of propiverine, are less expressed in the colon. Therefore, disposition and pharmacodynamics of propiverine were measured in a double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study with administration of 15 mg immediate release 3 times daily for 7 days compared to 45 mg extended release once daily for 7 days in 24 healthy subjects. Twelve subjects also received 15 mg propiverine intravenously. Serum and urine propiverine levels were measured repeatedly following oral administration on day 7 for up to 72 hours and correlated to duodenal expression of CYP3A4, ABCB1, and ABCC2. Propiverine immediate release 3 times daily was not different to extended release once daily in areas under the serum concentration-time curve (0-24 hours) and peak-trough fluctuation. The areas under the serum concentration-time curve of propiverine immediate release was circadian-time-dependent, with the lowest values during the night. Disposition of intravenous propiverine and propiverine immediate release administered in the night was influenced by intestinal expression of ABCC2. We concluded that oral absorption of propiverine is site-dependent and influenced by dosage form and circadian-time-dependent elimination processes.

The oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor roflumilast lacks relevant pharmacokinetic interactions with inhaled budesonide.

This open-label, randomized, 3-period crossover study evaluated the pharmacokinetic interaction potential of roflumilast and budesonide following repeated coadministration to healthy male subjects (N = 12). Treatments consisted of oral roflumilast 500 mug, once daily, orally inhaled budesonide 800 mug, twice daily, and concomitant administration of both treatments for 7 days each. Roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide in plasma and budesonide serum levels were measured by specific assays. Geometric mean test/reference ratios of steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated by analysis of variance. Safety and tolerability were monitored. Pharmacokinetic parameters of roflumilast, roflumilast N-oxide, and budesonide after coadministration of roflumilast and budesonide were similar to those after mono-treatment. Compared with budesonide and roflumilast mono-treatments, slightly lower maximum serum/plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the curve (AUC) values of roflumilast N-oxide and budesonide (ranging from -8% to -16%) were observed with combined treatment. All test/reference ratios were within predefined equivalence acceptance ranges for roflumilast AUC (0.80, 1.25) and C(max) (0.70, 1.43) and for roflumilast N-oxide and budesonide AUC and C(max) (all 0.67, 1.50). Coadministration of roflumilast and budesonide did not alter the steady-state disposition of each other and did not affect safety and tolerability of either drug.

Disposition and sterol-lowering effect of ezetimibe are influenced by single-dose coadministration of rifampin, an inhibitor of multidrug transport proteins.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The disposition and sterol-lowering effect of ezetimibe are associated with long-lasting enterosystemic circulation, which is initiated by secretion of ezetimibe and its glucuronide via intestinal P-glycoprotein (P-gp) (ABCB1) and the multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2) (ABCC2) into gut lumen. Hepatic uptake and secretion may contribute to recycling. To obtain deeper insight into the intestinal and hepatic processes, the disposition of ezetimibe was studied in the presence of rifampin (INN, rifampicin), a modulator of P-gp, MRP2, and hepatic organic anion (uptake) transporting polypeptides (OATPs) (SLCOs). METHODS: The disposition of ezetimibe (20 mg orally) alone and after coadministration of rifampin (600 mg orally) was measured in a crossover study of 8 healthy subjects with the SLCO1B1 *1a/*1a genotype. Concentrations of ezetimibe and its glucuronide in serum, urine, and feces, as well as cholesterol, lathosterol, and the plant sterols campesterol and sitosterol in serum, were quantified by use of liquid chromatography and gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection. RESULTS: After rifampin administration, the maximum serum concentrations of ezetimibe and its glucuronide were significantly elevated (12.0+/-4.20 ng/mL versus 4.67+/-2.72 ng/mL, P=.017, and 282+/-73.8 ng/mL versus 107+/-35.3 ng/mL, P=.012, respectively). The area under the curve of ezetimibe was not affected (102+/-37.6 ng.h/mL versus 140+/-86.3 ng.h/mL, P=not significant), whereas that of the glucuronide was markedly increased (2150+/-687 ng.h/mL versus 1030+/-373 ng.h/mL, P=.012). Renal clearance remained unchanged. Fecal excretion of ezetimibe was markedly decreased (7.6+/-2.2 mg versus 10.4+/-1.8 mg, P=.036), whereas renal excretion of the glucuronide was strongly elevated (4.8+/-1.9 mg versus 2.0+/-1.2 mg, P=.049) after coadministration. The onset of a significant sterol-lowering effect of ezetimibe was significantly shortened by rifampin coadministration. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of rifampin increases the maximum serum concentrations of ezetimibe but reduces its enterosystemic recycling, most likely by inhibition of the secretion of ezetimibe and its glucuronide via P-gp and MRP2.

Quantitative determination of nystatin in human plasma using LC-MS after inhalative administration in healthy subjects.

The antifungal polyene antibiotics nystatin was tested in a clinical trial to describe pharmacokinetics and safety after repeated administration of Nystatin "Lederle" sterile powder in healthy volunteers. To monitor the nystatin concentration-time profile in plasma we developed a sensitive method in the range of 1-100ng/ml based on liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. The target substance was separated from the biological matrix on C(18) solid-phase extraction cartridges with methanol. The Chromatography was performed isocratically using a reversed phase Caltrex Resorcinearene column. The mobile phase consisted of 5mM ammonium formate buffer and acetonitrile (40:60, v/v). The mass spectrometer works with electrospray ionization in its positive selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode using the respective MH(+) ions, m/z 926.6 for nystatin and m/z 924.4 for amphotericin B as internal standard. The method validation was performed according to the demands and international criteria for validation of bioanalytical methods and was successfully applied to the quantification of nystatin in human plasma in the pharmacokinetic trial.

Simvastatin does not influence the intestinal P-glycoprotein and MPR2, and the disposition of talinolol after chronic medication in healthy subjects genotyped for the ABCB1, ABCC2 and SLCO1B1 polymorphisms.

AIMS: To evaluate whether simvastatin influences (i) the intestinal expression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and MRP2, and (ii) the disposition of the beta(1)-selective blocker talinolol, a substrate of these transporter proteins. METHODS: The disposition of talinolol after intravenous (30 mg) and single or repeated oral administration (100 mg daily) was monitored before and after chronic treatment with simvastatin (40 mg daily) in 18 healthy subjects (10 males, eight females, body mass index 19.0-27.0 kg m(-2)) genotyped for ABCB1, ABCC2 and SLCO1B1 polymorphisms. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of simvastatin was evaluated before and after repeated oral talinolol administration. The duodenal expression of ABCB1 and ABCC2 mRNA before and after simvastatin treatment was quantified using real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (TaqMan. RESULTS: Simvastatin did not influence the expression of duodenal ABCB1 and ABCC2. There was no significant pharmacokinetic interaction between simvastatin and talinolol. Duodenal ABCB1 mRNA content was significantly correlated with the AUC(0-infinity) (r = 0.627, P = 0.039) and C(max) (r = 0.718, P = 0.013) of oral talinolol. The ABCB1 and ABCC2 gene polymorphisms did not influence simvastatin and talinolol disposition. The half-life of the latter was significantly shorter in the nine carriers with a SLCO1B1*1b allele compared with the seven subjects with the wild-type SLCO1B1*1a/*1a genotype (12.2 +/- 1.6 h vs. 14.5 +/- 1.4 h, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin does not influence the intestinal expression of P-gp and MRP2 in man. There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between talinolol and simvastatin during their chronic co-administration to healthy subjects.

Intestinal expression of P-glycoprotein (ABCB1), multidrug resistance associated protein 2 (ABCC2), and uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 predicts the disposition and modulates the effects of the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe in humans.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ezetimibe is an inhibitor of the cholesterol uptake transporter Niemann-Pick C1-like protein (NPC1L1). Target concentrations can be influenced by intestinal uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) and the efflux transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp) (ABCB1) and multidrug resistance associated protein 2 (MRP2) (ABCC2). This study evaluates the contribution of these factors to the disposition and cholesterol-lowering effect of ezetimibe before and after induction of UGT1A1, P-gp, and MRP2 with rifampin (INN, rifampicin). METHODS: Serum concentrations of ezetimibe, as well as its glucuronide, and the plant sterols campesterol and sitosterol (surrogate for cholesterol absorption) were studied in 12 healthy subjects before and after rifampin comedication. In parallel, duodenal expression of UGT1A1, P-gp, MRP2, and NPC1L1 was quantified by use of real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and quantitative immunohistochemical evaluation. The affinity of ezetimibe and its glucuronide to P-gp and MRP2 was assessed in P-gp- overexpressing Madin-Darby canine kidney II cells and P-gp-containing or MRP2-containing inside-out vesicles. RESULTS: Up-regulation of intestinal P-gp, MRP2, and UGT1A1 (but not of NPC1L1) by rifampin was associated with markedly decreased areas under the curve of ezetimibe and its glucuronide (116 +/- 78.1 ng.h/mL versus 49.9 +/- 31.0 ng.h/mL and 635 +/- 302 ng.h/mL versus 225 +/- 86.4 ng.h/mL, respectively; both P = .002) and increased intestinal clearances (2400 +/- 1560 mL/min versus 5500 +/- 4610 mL/min [P = .003] and 76.6 +/- 113 mL/min versus 316 +/- 457 mL/min [P = .010], respectively) and nearly abolished sterol-lowering effects. Intestinal expression of UGT1A1, ABCB1, and ABCC2 was inversely correlated with the effects of ezetimibe on plant sterol serum concentrations. Parallel in vitro studies confirmed that ezetimibe glucuronide is a high-affinity substrate of MRP2 and has a low affinity to P-gp whereas ezetimibe interacts with P-gp and MRP2. CONCLUSIONS: The disposition and sterol-lowering effects of ezetimibe are modified by metabolic degradation of the drug via intestinal UGT1A1 and either intestinal or hepatic secretion (or both) via P-gp and MRP2.

The talinolol double-peak phenomenon is likely caused by presystemic processing after uptake from gut lumen.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of the double-peak phenomenon during absorption of the beta(1)-selective blocker talinolol relative to paracetamol, which is well absorbed from all parts of the gut, and relative to vitamin A, which is absorbed via the lymphatic pathway. METHODS: Talinolol was given with paracetamol and retinyl palmitate in fast-disintegrating, enteric-coated, and rectal soft capsules to 8 fasting male healthy subjects (21-29 years, 68-86 kg). To evaluate whether the talinolol double-peak is associated with processes of food absorption, a breakfast was served 1 h after administration of a fast disintegrating capsule. RESULTS: Bioavailability of talinolol in enteric-coated and rectal capsules was significantly reduced by about 50% and 80%, respectively, despite unchanged bioavailability of paracetamol. Double-peaks appeared after 2-3 h and 4-6 h with talinolol given as fast-liberating capsules. Food increased the maximum concentrations significantly (223 +/- 76 microg/ml vs. 315 +/- 122 microg/ml, p < 0.05) and shifted the second peak of talinolol to shorter t(max) values (3.8 +/- 1.2 h vs. 2.1 +/- 0.6 h, p < 0.05), which was associated with faster absorption of retinyl palmitate. Pharmacokinetic model fits showed that about half of the oral talinolol dose given with and without meal is drained from the intestine via a presystemic storage compartment. CONCLUSIONS: The double-peak phenomenon of talinolol is likely caused by a presystemic storage compartment, which represents the complex interplay of heterogeneous uptake and kick-back transport processes along the intestinal-hepatic absorption pathway.