Design of a Nursing Home Infection Control Peer Coaching Program.

OBJECTIVE: To pilot test and refine an infection control peer coaching program, Infection Control Amplification in Nursing Centers (ICAN), in partnership with providers. DESIGN: Intervention design and pilot test. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Infection preventionists (IPs) from 7 Connecticut nursing homes (NHs). METHODS: We codesigned and pilot tested the ICAN program with NH IPs. The initial program involved designating peer coaches to provide real-time feedback on infection control practices to coworkers and targeting coaches' observations using data from both observations shared by coaches in daily huddles and weekly audit data about hand hygiene, masking, and transmission-based precautions. IPs tested the initial program while providing feedback to the research team during weekly calls. We used information from the calls, participant surveys, and the pilot process to update the program. RESULTS: Despite IPs reporting that the initial program was highly aligned with facility priorities and needs, their weekly call attendance dropped as they dealt with short staffing and COVID-19-related outbreaks and none implemented all of the program's components as intended. Most IPs described making changes to increase feasibility and reduce burden on staff amid short staffing and other ongoing issues exacerbated by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We used information from the IPs and the pilot to update the program, including shifting from having IPs lead implementation solo to using a team-based approach. The updated program retains peer coaches and audit data, while broadening the mode of feedback from huddles only to communication using one-on-one meetings or emails, huddles, or other strategies. It also provides NH staff with flexibility to tailor implementation of each to their needs and constraints. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Working with staff, we developed an infection control peer coaching program that may be of use to NH leaders seeking strategies to strengthen infection control practices. Future work should involve implementing and evaluating the updated program.

Providers' Perspectives on High-Quality Dementia Care in Long-Term Care.

OBJECTIVES: To understand dementia care providers' perspectives on high-quality care for persons living with dementia (PLWD) in long-term care (LTC). DESIGN: A qualitative study using a directed content analysis approach. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Nine national LTC dementia care providers. METHODS: We facilitated 5 listening sessions centered around dementia care philosophies, models, and practices. Two researchers first mapped qualitative data to the Holistic Approach to Transformational Change (HATCh) model for dementia care using a directed content analysis approach. They then identified themes and subthemes emerging from the data using a conventional analysis approach. They coded data iteratively and solicited input from 3 additional researchers to reach consensus where needed. Member checks were performed to ensure the trustworthiness of the data during 2 follow-up listening sessions. RESULTS: The 9 participants described the importance of understanding the experiences of PLWDs in order to provide high-quality dementia care and to deliver such care with the residents and their preferences as the focus. They emphasized experiential education as essential for families and all staff, regardless of role. They noted the need to balance safety with resident choice, as well as the corresponding need for facility leadership and regulators to support such choices. The listening sessions revealed areas to foster person-centered care for PLWD, but also highlighted barriers to implementing this philosophy in LTC settings. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Emergent themes included care practices that center on resident preferences and are supported by staff with the experiential education and communication skills necessary to relate to and support PLWD. These findings provide contextual information for researchers seeking to identify and test interventions that reflect LTC providers' priorities for PLWD and emphasize the need to align research priorities with provider priorities.

Facility characteristics and costs associated with meeting proposed minimum staffing levels in skilled nursing facilities.

BACKGROUND: Federal minimum nurse staffing levels for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) were proposed in 2019 U.S. Congressional bills. We estimated costs and personnel needed to meet the proposed staffing levels, and examined characteristics of SNFs not meeting these thresholds. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of 2019Q4 payroll data, the Hospital Wage Index, and other administrative data for 14,964 Medicare and Medicaid-certified SNFs. We examined characteristics of SNFs not meeting proposed minimum thresholds: 4.1 total nursing hours per resident day (HPRD); 0.75 registered nurse (RN) HPRD; 0.54 licensed practical nurse (LPN) HPRD; and 2.81 certified nursing assistant (CNA) HPRD. For SNFs falling below the thresholds, we calculated the additional HPRD needed, along with the associated full-time equivalent (FTE) personnel and salary costs. RESULTS: In 2019, 25.0% of SNFs met the minimum 4.1 total nursing HPRD, while 31.0%, 84.5%, and 10.7% met the RN, LPN, and CNA thresholds, respectively. Only 5.0% met all four categories. In adjusted analyses, factors most strongly associated with SNFs not meeting the proposed minimums were: higher Medicaid census, larger bed size, for-profit ownership, higher county SNF competition; and, for RNs specifically, higher community poverty and lower Medicare census. Rural SNFs were less likely to meet all categories and this was explained primarily by county SNF competition. We estimate that achieving the proposed federal minimums across SNFs nationwide would require an estimated additional 35,804 RN, 3509 LPN, and 116,929 CNA FTEs at $7.25 billion annually in salary costs based on current wage rates and prepandemic resident census levels. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving proposed minimum nurse staffing levels in SNFs will require substantial financial investment in the workforce and targeted support of low-resource facilities. Extensive recruitment and retention efforts are needed to overcome supply constraints, particularly in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Strategies associated with COVID-19 vaccine coverage among nursing home staff.

BACKGROUND: After the first of three COVID-19 vaccination clinics in U.S. nursing homes (NHs), the median vaccination coverage of staff was 37.5%, indicating the need to identify strategies to increase staff coverage. We aimed at comparing the facility-level activities, policies, incentives, and communication methods associated with higher staff COVID-19 vaccination coverage. METHODS: Design. Case-control analysis. SETTING: Nationally stratified random sample of 1338 U.S. NHs participating in the Pharmacy Partnership for Long-Term Care Program. PARTICIPANTS: Nursing home leadership. MEASUREMENT: During February 4-March 2, 2021, we surveyed NHs with low (<35%), medium (40%-60%), and high (>75%) staff vaccination coverage, to collect information on facility strategies used to encourage staff vaccination. Cases were respondents with medium and high vaccination coverage, whereas controls were respondents with low coverage. We used logistic regression modeling, adjusted for county and NH characteristics, to identify strategies associated with facility-level vaccination coverage. RESULTS: We obtained responses from 413 of 1338 NHs (30.9%). Compared with facilities with lower staff vaccination coverage, facilities with medium or high coverage were more likely to have designated frontline staff champions (medium: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.6, 95% CI 1.3-10.3; high: aOR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.7) and set vaccination goals (medium: aOR 2.4, 95% 1.0-5.5; high: aOR 3.7, 95% CI 1.6-8.3). NHs with high vaccination coverage were more likely to have given vaccinated staff rewards such as T-shirts compared with NHs with low coverage (aOR 3.8, 95% CI 1.3-11.0). Use of multiple strategies was associated with greater likelihood of facilities having medium or high vaccination coverage: For example, facilities that used ≥9 strategies were three times more likely to have high staff vaccination coverage than facilities using <6 strategies (aOR 3.3, 95% CI 1.2-8.9). CONCLUSIONS: Use of designated champions, setting targets, and use of non-monetary awards were associated with high NH staff COVID-19 vaccination coverage.

Feasibility of a Nursing Home Antibiotic Stewardship Intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a bundled electronic intervention to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in US nursing homes. DESIGN: Prospective mixed-methods quality improvement intervention. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Nursing staff and residents in 13 nursing homes, and residents in 8 matched-control facilities (n = 21 facilities total, from 2 corporations). METHODS: This study involved a 2-month design period (n = 5 facilities) focused on the acceptability and feasibility of a bundled electronic intervention consisting of 3 tools, followed by a 15-month implementation period (n = 8 facilities) during which we used rapid-cycle quality improvement methods to refine and add to the bundle. We used mixed-methods data from providers, intervention tools, and health records to assess feasibility and conduct a difference-in-difference analysis among the 8 intervention sites and 8 pair-matched controls. RESULTS: Nurses at 5 pilot sites reported that initial versions of the electronic tools were acceptable and feasible, but barriers emerged when 8 different facilities began implementing the tools, prompting iterative revisions to the training and bundle. The final bundle consisted of 3 electronic tools and training that standardized digital documentation to document and track a change in resident condition, infections, antibiotic prescribing, and antibiotic follow-up. By the end of the implementation phase, all 8 facilities were using at least 1 of the 3 tools. Early antibiotic discontinuation increased 10.5% among intervention sites, but decreased 10.8% among control sites. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The 3 tools in our bundled electronic intervention capture clinical and prescribing data necessary to assess changes in antibiotic use and were feasible for nurses to adopt. Achieving this required modifying the tools and training before the intervention reached its final form. Comparisons of rates of antibiotic use at intervention and control facilities showed promising improvement in antibiotic discontinuation, demonstrating that the intervention could be evaluated using secondary electronic health record data.

Rapid Changes in the Provision of Rehabilitation Care in Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Settings During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected rehabilitation care in post-acute and long-term care. As part of a process to assess research priorities, we surveyed professionals in these settings to assess the impact of the pandemic and related research needs. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of open-ended survey results. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 30 clinical and administrative staff working in post-acute and long-term care. METHODS: From June 24 through July 10, 2020, we used professional connections to disseminate an electronic survey to a convenience sample of clinical and administrative staff. We conducted an inductive thematic analysis of the data. RESULTS: We identified 4 themes, related to (1) rapid changes in care delivery, (2) negative impact on patients' motivation and physical function, (3) new access barriers and increased costs, and (4) uncertainty about sustaining changes in delivery and payment. Rapid changes: Respondents described how infection control policies and practices shifted rehabilitation from group sessions and communal gyms to the bedside and telehealth. Negative impact: Respondents felt that patients' isolation, particularly in residential care settings, affected their motivation for rehabilitation and their physical function. Access and costs: Respondents expressed concerns about increased costs (eg, for personal protective equipment) and decreased patient volume, as well as access issues. Uncertainty: At the same time, respondents described how telehealth and Medicare waivers enabled new ways to connect with patients and wondered whether waivers would be extended after the public health emergency. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Survey results highlight rapid changes to rehabilitation in post-acute and long-term care during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Because staff vaccine coverage remains low and patients vulnerable in residential care settings, changes such as infection precautions are likely to persist. Future research should evaluate the impact on care, outcomes, and costs.

Nursing home leaders' perceptions of a research partnership.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Partnerships between healthcare providers and researchers may accelerate the translation of interventions into widespread practice by testing them under real-world conditions, but depend on provider's willingness to engage with researchers and ability to fully implement an intervention. AIM: To understand nursing home leader's motivations for participating in a research study and perceptions of the process and value. METHODS: After a feasibility study of tuned lighting in a nursing home, we conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with six facility leaders. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and independently coded by four investigators. RESULTS: Three themes emerged: (1) The importance of the nursing home's culture and context: the facility had stable leadership, clear processes for prioritizing and implementing new initiatives, and an established interest in the study's topic. (2) The importance of leader's belief in the value of the intervention: leaders perceived research generally and the intervention specifically as positively impacting their facility and residents. (3) The importance of ongoing collaboration and flexibility throughout the study period: leaders served as champions to catalyze the project and overcome implementation barriers. CONCLUSION: Nursing home leader's perspectives about their participation in a feasibility study underscore the importance of establishing strong researcher-provider partnerships, understanding the environment in which the intervention will be implemented, and employing pragmatic methods that allow for flexibility in response to real-world implementation barriers. We recommend eliciting qualitative information to understand the environment in which an intervention will be implemented and to engage opinion leaders who can inform the protocol and champion its success.

Omissions of Care in Nursing Homes: A Uniform Definition for Research and Quality Improvement.

Omission of care in US nursing homes can lead to increased risk for harm or adverse outcomes, decreased quality of life for residents, and increased healthcare expenditures. However, scholars and policymakers in long-term care have taken varying approaches to defining omissions of care, which makes efforts to prevent them challenging. Subject matter experts and a broad range of nursing home stakeholders participated in iterative rounds of engagement to identify key concepts and aspects of omissions of care and develop a consensus-based definition that is clear, meaningful, and actionable for nursing homes. The resulting definition is "Omissions of care in nursing homes encompass situations when care-either clinical or nonclinical-is not provided for a resident and results in additional monitoring or intervention or increases the risk of an undesirable or adverse physical, emotional, or psychosocial outcome for the resident." This concise definition is grounded in goal-concordant, resident-centered care, and can be used for a variety quality improvement purposes and for research.

Omissions of Care in Nursing Home Settings: A Narrative Review.

OBJECTIVES: This review aims to (1) examine existing definitions of omissions of care in the healthcare environment and associated characteristics and (2) outline adverse events that may be attributable to omissions of care among nursing home populations. DESIGN: Nonsystematic review. A literature search for published articles on care omissions in nursing home settings and related adverse events was performed using the databases PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO Academic Search Premier, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) until January 2019. Articles were excluded if they were published in a language other than English or included samples that were not relevant to nursing home settings. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Adult samples in nursing home settings or settings likely to include nursing homes as part of the continuum of care. MEASURES: Articles must provide a definition of missed or omitted care relevant to nursing home settings or include adverse events that can be attributed to care omissions. RESULTS: From a total of 2155 articles retrieved, 34 were retained for thematic synthesis. Key themes included broad agreement that any delay or failure of care is an omission; diverse views on including consideration of risks or occurrence of adverse events within the definition; diverse approaches to including components of care delivery systems in the definition; recognition that care in nursing homes includes both clinical and psychosocial care; and awareness that insufficient or inadequate resources to meet care demands can cause omissions. For research on adverse events attributable to omissions, 327 of 8385 articles were included for review. Nineteen adverse events were identified and omissions contributing to their incidence are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Definitions of omissions of care for nursing homes vary in scope and level of detail. Substantial evidence connects omissions of care with an array of adverse events in nursing home populations.

National Trends in Treatment Initiation for Nursing Home Residents With Diabetes Mellitus, 2008 to 2010.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes mellitus is common in the nursing home (NH) population, yet little is known about prescribing of glucose-lowering medications in the NH setting. We describe trends in initiation of glucose-lowering medications in a national cohort of NH residents. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort study using Part A and D claims for a random 20% of Medicare enrollees linked to NH Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Online Survey, Certification, and Reporting (OSCAR) databases in 7158 US NHs. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 11,531 long-stay (continuous residence of ≥90 days) NH residents 65 years or older with diabetes who received a glucose-lowering medication between 2008 and 2010 after 4 months of nonuse. MEASUREMENTS: Medicare Part D drug dispensing of glucose-lowering treatments; resident and facility characteristics preceding medication initiation. RESULTS: We observed decreasing sulfonylurea initiation from 25.4% of initiations in 2008 to 11.7% in 2010, an average decrease of 1% per quarter (95% CLs -1.5 to -0.5). Thiazolidinedione initiation decreased from 4.7% to 1.9%, an average decrease of 0.3% per quarter (95% CLs -0.4 to -0.2), and meglitinide initiation from 1.5% to 0.3%. No appreciable linear trends were observed for metformin (range 12.0%-18.8%) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (range 0.9%-2.7%). In contrast, insulin use increased from 51.7% to 68.3% during the same time period, driven by a marked increase in initiation of rapid-acting insulin (11.0% to 29.4%; average increase of 1.4% per quarter, 95% CLs 0.9-1.9) and a modest increase in short-acting insulin (22.6% to 30.3%; an average increase of 0.6% per quarter, 95% CLs -0.1 to 1.3). CONCLUSIONS: Between 2008 and 2010, there were substantial decreases in the use of oral glucose-lowering agents and corresponding increases in the use of insulin among long-term residents of US NHs.

Report on milestones for care and support under the U.S. National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Under the U.S. national Alzheimer's plan, the National Institutes of Health identified milestones required to meet the plan's biomedical research goal (Goal 1). However, similar milestones have not been created for the goals on care (Goal 2) and support (Goal 3). METHODS: The Alzheimer's Association convened a workgroup with expertise in clinical care, long-term services and supports, dementia care and support research, and public policy. The workgroup reviewed the literature on Alzheimer's care and support; reviewed how other countries are addressing the issue; and identified public policies needed over the next 10 years to achieve a more ideal care and support system. RESULTS: The workgroup developed and recommended 73 milestones for Goal 2 and 56 milestones for Goal 3. DISCUSSION: To advance the implementation of the U.S. national Alzheimer's plan, the U.S. government should adopt these recommended milestones, or develop similar milestones, to be incorporated into the national plan.

Community outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: school-based cluster of neurologic disease associated with household transmission of respiratory illness.

BACKGROUND: We investigated an outbreak of severe neurologic disease and pneumonia that occurred among students at 4 schools in Rhode Island. METHODS: We identified cases of encephalitis, encephalomyelitis, and pneumonia that occurred among schoolchildren from 1 September 2006 through 9 February 2007, and we performed serologic tests, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis, and culture for the detection of multiple pathogens in oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal specimens. Students with positive results of M. pneumoniae IgM serologic testing and no alternative diagnosis were considered to be infected with M. pneumoniae. At school A, we used questionnaires to identify students and their household contacts who made visits to physicians for pneumonia and cough. We compared observed and expected rates of pneumonia. RESULTS: Rates of pneumonia among elementary students (122 cases/1000 student-years) were > 5-fold higher than expected. Three students had encephalitis or encephalomyelitis, and 76 had pneumonia. Of these 2 groups of students, 2 (66%) and 57 students (75%), respectively, had M. pneumoniae infection. M. pneumoniae was detected by PCR in 10 students with pneumonia; 5 of these specimens were cultured, and M. pneumoniae was isolated in 4. Of 202 households of students attending school A, 20 (10%) accounted for 61% of visits to physicians for pneumonia or cough. Of 19 household contacts of students with pneumonia, 8 (42%) developed pneumonia and 6 (32%) reported visits for cough. CONCLUSIONS: M. pneumoniae caused a community-wide outbreak of cough illness and pneumonia and was associated with the development of life-threatening neurologic disease. Although M. pneumoniae was detected in schools, its transmission in households amplified the outbreak. Interrupting household transmission should be a priority during future outbreaks.

Critical review of resident assessment protocols.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of all 18 federally mandated Resident Assessment Protocols (RAPs) by measuring their adherence to established criteria for clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). DESIGN: Analytical evaluation. SETTING: United States nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen federally mandated RAPs. MEASUREMENTS: Each RAP was evaluated using review criteria based on the 1992 Institute of Medicine criteria for measuring the quality of clinical practice guidelines. Criteria included measurements of RAP validity, reliability/reproducibility, clinical applicability, clinical flexibility, clarity/format, scheduled review, expertise needed to complete, multidisciplinary process, and resources needed to complete. Two reviewers, each a geriatrician with expertise in nursing home medicine, evaluated each RAP on the degree of compliance with each criterion using a 2-point scale for each criterion. RESULTS: Overall, no individual RAP met all of the review criteria. The Urinary Incontinence RAP best approximated all the review criteria. The Pressure Ulcer RAP received the lowest score. Notable deficiencies in most of the RAPs included poor validity, documentation, reliability, clinical flexibility, and clinical applicability. CONCLUSION: The RAPs synthesize large amounts of information into key points and recommendations. Nevertheless, RAPs perform poorly when held to formal standards expected for CPGs. Based on these findings, the authors and a technical expert panel convened by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality generated recommendations that might improve the use and quality of future RAPs.