Antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen prevent viral reactivation in recipients of liver grafts from anti-HBC positive donors.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Liver donors with serological evidence of resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) negative, anti-HBV core (HBc) positive) can transmit HBV infection to recipients. In the context of organ shortage, we investigated the efficacy of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) to prevent HBV infection, and assessed the infectious risk by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for HBV DNA on serum and liver tissue of anti-HBc positive donors. PATIENTS: Between 1997 and 2000, 22 of 315 patients were transplanted with liver allografts from anti-HBc positive donors. Long term HBIG therapy was administered to 16 recipients. Four naive and two vaccinated patients received no prophylaxis. RESULTS: Hepatitis B developed in the four HBV naive recipients without prophylaxis and in none of the vaccinated subjects. Among the 16 recipients receiving HBIG, one patient with residual anti-HBs titres below 50 UI/ml became HBsAg positive. The remaining 15 remained HBsAg negative and HBV DNA negative by PCR testing throughout a 20 month (range 4-39) follow up period. HBV DNA was detected by PCR in 1/22 donor serum, and in 11/21 liver grafts with normal histology. A mean of 12 months post-transplantation (range 1-23) HBV DNA was no longer detectable in graft biopsies from patients remaining HBsAg negative. CONCLUSION: Anti-HBs antibodies may control HBV replication in liver grafts from anti-HBc positive donors, without additional antiviral drugs. These grafts are thus suitable either to effectively vaccinated recipients or to those who are given HBIG to prevent HBV recurrence.

Genetic clustering of hepatitis C virus strains and severity of recurrent hepatitis after liver transplantation.

The influence of viral factors on the severity of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease is controversial. We studied 68 liver transplant patients with recurrent hepatitis C, of whom 53 were infected by genotype 1 strains. Relationships between core sequences, serum HCV RNA levels, and fibrosis scores for each patient were analyzed in pairwise fashion 5 years after transplantation. We used Mantel's test, a matrix correlation method, to evaluate the correspondence between measured genetic distances and observed phenotypic differences. No clear relationship was found when all 68 patients were analyzed. In contrast, when the 53 patients infected by genotype 1 strains were analyzed, a strong positive relationship was found between genetic distance and differences in 5-year fibrosis scores (P = 0.001) and differences in virus load (P = 0.009). In other words, the smaller the genetic distance between two patients' viral core sequences, the smaller the difference between the two patients' fibrosis scores and viral replication levels. No relationship was found between genetic distance and differences in age, sex, or immunosuppression. In multivariate analysis, the degree of fibrosis was negatively related to the virus load (r = -0.68; P = 0.003). In the particular setting of liver transplantation, and among strains with closely related phylogenetic backgrounds (genotype 1), this study points to a correlation between the HCV genetic sequence and the variability of disease expression.

Fulminant non--A-G viral hepatitis leading to liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: All hepatotropic viruses are known to cause fulminant hepatic failure (FHF). However, in 30% to 40% of patients with FHF, the precise cause remains unknown. We aimed to better define this subgroup. METHODS: We evaluated the clinical course and outcome of 7 patients admitted during a 22-month period with fulminant viral hepatitis leading to liver transplantation; none had serologic or molecular evidence of hepatitis A, B, C, D, E, or G viral infection, thus the term non-A-G viral hepatitis. All known etiologies of FHF were excluded. RESULTS: All patients had prodromal symptoms suggestive of viral causes. Mean age was 30 years. The interval between onset of jaundice and appearance of encephalopathy was 23 days (range, 4-50 days). Five patients had grade III/IV encephalopathy. Serum alanine aminotransferase levels showed a single peak of activity. The duration between first symptoms and liver transplantation was 28 days (range, 12-71 days). Results of histological study of the explanted liver showed submassive (4 patients) or massive (3 patients) hepatocyte necrosis. In all patients, results of polymerase chain reaction analysis did not detect hepatitis B virus DNA, hepatitis C virus RNA, or hepatitis G virus RNA in the explanted liver. After transplantation, 2 patients showed (6 months later) increased liver enzyme levels of undetermined cause, and results of a liver biopsy showed mild lobular hepatitis; 1 patient had lymphoproliferative disorder (Epstein-Barr virus-originated); and 1 patient, aplastic anemia, which is known to be associated with seronegative viral hepatitis. The latter patient died, whereas the other 6 patients are alive (survival rate, 86%). CONCLUSIONS: Our patients with non-A-G viral hepatitis had a severe acute onset with progressive FHF requiring liver transplantation. There is some suggestion of recurrent viral disease after transplantation implicating other unknown viruses in the etiology.

Long-term ganciclovir therapy for hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) disease on a liver graft is associated with florid viral replication and graft failure. The aim of this study performed between 1992 and 1995 was to investigate the safety and efficacy of long-term intravenous ganciclovir for HBV infection in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Twelve patients with HBV re-infection and four with de novo HBV infection were studied. HBV DNA was positive in all (median titer: 437.5 pg/ml) and HBeAg was positive in seven. Intravenous ganciclovir was started after a median of 14.5 months from HBsAg positivation and continued for a median of 10 months. RESULTS: A complete response with HBV DNA negativation was seen in ten cases, a partial response with a decrease of more than 50% of initial HBV DNA levels in four and no response in two. Overall tolerance was good. Among the ten complete responders, two seroconverted for both HBsAg and HBeAg and one for HBsAg alone. Among these ten patients, three were re-transplanted for liver failure: two of them are alive; three had a viral breakthrough during treatment; and four remained HBV DNA negative: two are alive and two died. Partial responders and nonresponders were treated with other antiviral agents and three were re-transplanted, two of them are alive. Overall 12 out of 16 patients (75%) survived with a median follow up of 46 months. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term intravenous ganciclovir can persistently inhibit HBV DNA replication in liver transplant recipients and is well tolerated. Further evaluation should be encouraged, especially for HBV recurrence after first-line treatments.

European collaborative study on factors influencing outcome after liver transplantation for hepatitis C. European Concerted Action on Viral Hepatitis (EUROHEP) Group.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease is characterized by frequent graft infection by HCV. The prognosis and risk factors for morbidity and mortality in this condition were determined. METHODS: A retrospective study of 652 consecutive anti-HCV-positive patients undergoing liver transplantation between 1984 and 1995 in 15 European centers was conducted; 102 patients coinfected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) received immunoglobulin prophylaxis for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen. RESULTS: Overall, 5-year survival was 72%. Five-year actuarial rates of hepatitis and cirrhosis were 80% and 10%. Genotypes 1b, 1a, and 2 were detected in 214 (80%), 24 (9%), and 24 (9%) of 268 patients analyzed. The only discriminant factor for patient or graft survival was hepatocellular carcinoma as primary indication. Independent risk factors for recurrent hepatitis included the absence of HBV coinfection before transplantation (relative risk [RR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.6; P = 0.005), genotype 1b (RR, 2; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9; P = 0.01), and age > 49 years (RR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of transplantation for HCV-related disease are compromised by a significant risk of cirrhosis, although 5-year survival is satisfactory. Genotype 1b, age, and absence of pretransplantation coinfection by HBV are risk factors for recurrent HCV.

Retransplantation of the liver for recurrent hepatitis B virus infection: the Paul Brousse experience.

Recurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection of the liver graft is characterized by a severe outcome and high level of HBV replication. For many investigators, retransplantation appears contraindicated because of constant recurrence and a high mortality. We report our experience in this setting. Between January 1985 and December 1995, 10 patients who underwent retransplantation for HBV graft reinfection were studied. According to the antiviral treatment administered after HBV recurrence on the first liver graft and the protocol of antiviral prophylaxis after retransplantation, two groups were defined: group 1 underwent retransplantation before January 1992 (n = 5), and group 2 underwent retransplantation after January 1992 (n = 5). At the time of reinfection, serum HBV DNA was positive in all patients, hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg) was positive in 6 patients. Antiviral therapy was administered to 7 patients (group 1, adenine arabinoside mono phosphate [ara-Amp; n = 3]; group 2, ara-Amp [n = 5], ganciclovir [n = 4]). After retransplantation, long-term antibody to HB surface antigen (anti-HBs) immunoglobulins were administered to achieve an anti-HBs titer greater than 100 IU/L in group 1 and to achieve an anti-HBs titer greater than 500 IU/L associated with prophylactic intravenous ganciclovir administration (5 mg/kg three times weekly) for 2 years in group 2. In group 1, all patients died, either perioperatively or secondary to HBV recurrence (1 year survival, 0%). In group 2, 1 patient died 50 months after retransplantation of HBV cirrhosis on the second graft, and 4 patients remained HBsAg negative at a mean of 41 months (range, 24 to 68 months) after retransplantation. The prognosis of retransplantation for HBV recurrence was dramatically improved by the administration of antiviral therapy before retransplantation and the maintenance of a high anti-HBs level combined with antiviral therapy after retransplantation.

Long-term follow-up after liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis: evidence of recurrence of primary disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: After liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis, the long-term results and the incidence of recurrence of primary disease are unknown. METHODS: In this retrospective study we reviewed the clinical course of 25 patients transplanted for autoimmune hepatitis and followed for a mean of 5.3 years (2-8.5 years). RESULTS: The actuarial 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 91% (+/-6%) and 83% (+/-8%). The actuarial 1-year rate of acute rejection was 50% (+/-10.2%), which was comparable to that of patients transplanted for primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Autoantibodies persisted in 77% of patients, at a lower titer than before liver transplantation. Ten patients were excluded from the study of autoimmune hepatitis recurrence, one because of an early postoperative death and nine because of hepatitis C virus infection acquired before or after liver transplantation. In the remaining 15 patients, who were free of hepatitis C virus infection, 5-year patient and graft survivals were 100% and 87%, respectively. Despite triple immunosuppressive therapy, three patients (20%) developed chronic hepatitis with histological and serological features of autoimmune hepatitis in the absence of any other identifiable cause. The disease was severe in two patients, leading to graft failure and asymptomatic in another, despite marked histological abnormalities. In one of these three patients, autoimmune hepatitis recurred on the second liver graft as well. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis have an excellent survival rate although severe primary disease may recur, suggesting the need for stronger post-operative immunosuppressive therapy.

Effects of ribavirin on hepatitis C-associated nephrotic syndrome in four liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) is associated with a variety of extrahepatic disorders such as membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN), which is generally due to cryoglobulinemia. After liver transplantation for HCV cirrhosis, alpha-interferon treatment against the recurrence of HCV in the liver graft is poorly effective and may induce intractable graft rejection. METHODS: We describe the cases of four liver transplant recipients treated with ribavirin for HCV-related glomerulopathy and nephrotic syndrome. RESULTS: The nephrotic syndrome was attenuated or disappeared during ribavirin therapy, and patients showed a marked decrease in proteinuria and an increase in albuminemia. The syndrome relapsed in two patients when ribavirin therapy was stopped, and a favorable response was again obtained in both cases when the treatment was resumed. The main adverse effect of ribavirin was anemia in two patients with renal impairment. No graft rejection occurred. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that continuous therapy with low doses of oral ribavirin may improve the proteinuria of hepatitis C-related glomerulonephritis, at least in liver transplant recipients.

Incidence of hepatitis C in patients receiving different preparations of hepatitis B immunoglobulins after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation is a clinical problem. Polyclonal immunoglobulins against hepatitis B surface antigen (HBIGs) prevent the recurrence of HBV infection, but no effective prophylaxis is available for HCV infection. Before screening of blood donors was introduced in France, HBIGs may have contained antibody to HCV (anti-HCV). OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of HBIG on the occurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation before and after 1990. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Liver transplantation unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 428 consecutive patients who had liver transplantation because of cirrhosis between 1984 and 1994. MEASUREMENTS: Detection of serum HCV RNA before and 1 year after transplantation and findings on liver graft biopsy. RESULTS: Among the 218 patients who had HCV infection before transplantation, the incidence of HCV viremia after transplantation was lower in those receiving HBIG than in those not receiving HBIG (25 of 46 patients [54%] compared with 162 of 172 patients [94%]; P < 0.001). In patients receiving HBIG, the incidence of HCV viremia after transplantation was lower among those who had transplantation before March 1990 than among those who had transplantation after this date (15 of 33 patients [45%] compared with 10 of 13 patients [77%]; P = 0.05). Among the 210 patients without HCV infection before transplantation, acquired infection was significantly less frequent in those receiving HBIG than in those not receiving HBIG (18 of 68 patients [26%] compared with 40 of 86 patients [47%]; P < 0.001). Passively transmitted anti-HCV was transiently detected in patients receiving HBIG before March 1990. Multivariate analysis in patients with HCV infection before transplantation showed that the absence of HBIG and transplantation after March 1990 were independent significant risk factors for chronic hepatitis C after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Polyclonal immunoglobulins that are treated for viral decontamination and contain anti-HCV could prevent HCV infection.

[Compartmental distribution of hepatitis C virus quasispecies in mononuclear cells and liver].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the role of the infection of monouclear cells by hepatitis C virus(HCV) in the chronicity of HCV infection. METHODS: Direct sequencing of the amplified hypervariable region (HVR) gene of HCV was used to distinguish main HCV quasispecies infecting non-hepatocytes from those infecting hepatocytes and circulating virions. The main HCV quasispecies in peripheral blood mononuclear cells(PBMC), liver-associated mononuclear cells (LAMC), serum and liver samples from 6 patients with chronic hepatitis C and from 6 patients with HCV-related cirrhosis were analysed and compared. RESULTS: The main HCV qusispecies in the livers were different from those in PBMC in 3 transplanted cirrhotic patients and 5 patients with chronic hepatitis C. Different substitutions existed between PBMC and LAMC in 3 of 6 patients analysed. Mutations were observed within the first 50 amino acids of E2 gene, which induced amino acid change in 6 of 9 patients analysed. CONCLUSION: In chronically infected patients, the detection of HCV RNA in mononuclear cells is not due to the adsorption of circulating virions but a significant infection. The compartmental distribution of HCV quasispecies in hepatocytes and mononuclear cells could be involved in the chronicity of HCV infection.

Long-term longitudinal study of intrahepatic hepatitis C virus replication after liver transplantation.

Recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation is common and can lead to severe liver diseases. Although immunosuppression and high levels of viremia suggest a direct pathogenicity of hepatitis C virus (HCV), the relations between viral replication and long-term histological course are still unknown. Thirty-three patients with a mean histological follow-up of 3.5 years (3 months - 8.6 years) were analyzed. Nineteen patients were infected by genotype 1b. Liver HCV RNA was determined in parallel with the quantitation of an internal control (28S ribosomal RNA) by competitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Lobular hepatitis (LH) and chronic active hepatitis (CAH) occurred in 27 and 19 patients, respectively. Levels of liver HCV RNA determined in 84 biopsies were higher in cases of LH than in the other patterns (82 +/- 123 vs. 19 +/- 38; P < .01) and were unrelated to the genotype. Progression from LH to CAH was associated with a highly significant decrease of liver HCV RNA (P = .006), which was not observed in patients with stable histology. Among patients with CAH, those infected by genotype 1b had more severe liver damage and lower levels of liver HCV RNA than others (P = .04). Multivariate analysis showed that high levels of liver HCV RNA at the time of the first posttransplantation biopsy was an independent predictor of CAH (P = .01). After liver transplantation, the progression to CAH together with a decrease of liver HCV RNA suggests that a host's response is involved in the long-term viral pathogenicity. This response may be stronger and liver disease more severe in patients with high levels of replication at the time of LH and in those infected by genotype 1b.

De novo and apparent de novo hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to clarify the aetiology of apparent de novo HBV infection after liver transplantation. METHODS: Twenty out of 570 HBsAg negative patients (3.5%) became HBsAg positive after transplantation and were studied. Donor and recipient sera were retrospectively tested for HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc, and HBV DNA by PCR. Donor and recipient livers were tested for HBV DNA by PCR on paraffin-embedded tissue. RESULTS: Group 1: HBV infection of donor origin (eight patients): one donor serum was HBsAg positive, three were serum HBV DNA positive, four were liver HBV DNA positive. Group 2: reactivation of latent HBV infection (eight patients) with detection of HBV DNA in pretransplant serum (seven patients) or in native liver (one patient): three were anti-HBs positive, two anti-HBc positive, and three with fulminant hepatitis had no serological HBV markers. Group 3: undetermined origin (four patients) defined by absence of HBV DNA in pretransplant donor and/or recipient sera and liver; however, acquired infection was suspected from two anti-HBs and anti-HBc positive donors. Two patients became HBsAg negative, and five HBV DNA negative. One died from HBV-cirrhosis and two were retransplanted. In the others, the last histology showed cirrhosis (three), chronic hepatitis (nine), acute hepatitis (one), and non-specific change (four patients). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of de novo HBV infection in liver transplant patients was 3.5%; the aetiology was determined in 16/20 patients: from the donor in eight, and from the recipient in eight. One should be cautious when donors or recipients are anti-HBc or both anti-HBs and anti-HBc positive.

Evidence for selection of hepatitis B mutants after liver transplantation through peripheral blood mononuclear cell infection.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite anti-HBs immunoglobulin therapy, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection recurs in a high proportion of patients transplanted for HBsAg positive and serum HBV DNA negative chronic liver disease. The contribution of HBV genetic variability to disease recurrence has not been yet thoroughly addressed. We have therefore undertaken a detailed comparison of preS/S and preC/C sequences in two selected patients with recurrence of HBsAg and HBV DNA after transplantation. METHODS: PreS/S and preC/C regions were amplified by PCR from the serum, peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) and liver tissues of two patients transplanted for end stage HBV-related cirrhosis. Samples were taken both pre- and post-transplantation. HBV-sequences from four to nine clones were determined and compared. RESULTS: A mixing of different HBV DNA molecules was observed within and between serum, liver and PBMC samples. Sequences from both patients showed mutations in the preC region which abolished HBeAg secretion, and in the preS2 initiation codon which prevented preS2 envelope protein production. In addition, for both patients, deletions in the preS2 domain (3 and 21 base pairs) led to the expression of modified preS1 envelope protein. For one patient, the predominant HBs protein sequence found in the PBMC before transplantation showed four specific mutations. One of these mutations was in the "a" determinant (codon 144, asparagine to glycine change) of the major envelope protein. These mutations were not detected, as predominant mutations, in the liver and serum pre-orthotopic liver transplant samples. In contrast, after liver transplantation, this was the major form identified in serum, liver and PBMC. CONCLUSIONS: Our results have shown the selection of different HBV DNA molecules in liver and mononuclear cells. In addition, they provide direct evidence for the role of PBMC in the infection of liver grafts and support the hypothesis that infection of PBMC might lead to selection of HBV variants which would escape immune therapy. Finally, we provide in vivo evidence for reinfection of the liver by HBV particles lacking preS2 envelope protein expression.

An open trial of interferon alfa recombinant for hepatitis C after liver transplantation: antiviral effects and risk of rejection.

The aim of this open trial was to assess the efficacy and the safety of interferon (IFN) alfa therapy in liver transplant recipients with chronic active hepatitis caused by hepatitis C virus. In July 1991, among 447 liver recipients regularly observed at our institution, 46 had developed HCV-related chronic active hepatitis defined by piece meal necrosis. Fourteen of these 46 patients received IFN alfa 3 mIU three times weekly for a planned duration of 6 months and were compared to the 32 untreated patients. Genotyping and quantification of viremia were performed using type-specific amplification and branched DNA assay. Histological follow-up was available in all patients and routinely before and after IFN therapy. Treated and untreated patients did not differ regarding gender, age, length of follow-up, maximum histological score, and genotypes (41 of 46 were of type 1b). Induction of chronic rejection was observed in 5 of 14 treated patients leading to retransplantation in 3. In contrast, chronic rejection occurred in 1 of 32 untreated patients (P < .005) during the posttransplantation follow-up. Among the 9 treated patients without rejection, a decrease of transaminases or of HCV RNA levels of more than 50% were observed in 8 and 4, respectively; 2 patients had a complete response, and 1 did not relapse after discontinuation of IFN. Histological improvement occurred in 2 of the treated patients and in none of the untreated patients. IFN therapy in liver transplant recipients has poor antiviral effect and can induce chronic rejection. Its use in this setting should be cautious.

Influence of the genotypes of hepatitis C virus on the severity of recurrent liver disease after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Several genotypes of hepatitis C virus (HCV) have been identified by phylogenetic analysis, but their clinical relevance remains elusive. Liver transplantation for HCV-related cirrhosis offers a unique opportunity for prospective studies of this issue. METHODS: Sixty anti-HCV-positive liver recipients with precise virological and histological assessments were included. HCV genotype was determined with both type-specific capsid primers and a line probe genotyping assay. RESULTS: HCV genotype 1b was the predominant type before transplantation (40 of 60 patients); after liver transplantation, acute and chronic active hepatitis developed more frequently in these patients than in patients infected by other genotypes (31 of 40 and 24 of 40 vs. 8 of 20 and 4 of 20 patients). Actuarial rates of acute hepatitis and chronic active hepatitis were 77% and 59%, respectively, 3 years after transplantation in patients infected by type 1b and 40% (P = 0.008) and 22% (P = 0.004) in those infected by other types. There was no statistical relation between the level of HCV viremia and HCV genotypes both before and after transplantation. In contrast, after transplantation, serum HCV RNA values were significantly increased in patients who developed hepatitis after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides direct evidence that HCV 1b is associated with more aggressive recurrent liver disease than other genotypes.

Hepatitis B virus precore mutations and HBeAg negative reactivation of chronic hepatitis B after interferon therapy.

The objective of this study was to look for HBV precore mutations in three patients with chronic active hepatitis B who developed HBV-DNA-positive/HBeAg-negative reactivation after HBe seroconversion induced by interferon therapy. Direct sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products was performed on serum collected before and after HBe seroconversion. In two patients precore sequence showed only wild-type HBV before and after interferon therapy. In one patient, precore sequence showed only wild-type HBV before interferon therapy and a mixed infection by wild-type HBV and precore mutant viruses (1858 and 1896 nucleotide mutations) after treatment. The presence of HBeAg/anti-HBe immune complexes was found after HBe seroconversion in all cases. Our results suggest that: 1) precore mutations are not always found in patients with chronic hepatitis B who develop HBV DNA-positive/HBeAg-negative reactivation; and 2) HBeAg negativity, despite the presence of wild-type HBV, might be due to HBeAg/anti-HBe immune complexes. We speculate that the production of these immune complexes may be favored by interferon therapy.

Low frequency of precore hepatitis B virus mutants in anti-hepatitis B e-positive reactivation after loss of hepatitis B e antigen in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of hepatitis B virus (HBV) precore mutations in patients with anti-HBe-positive chronic hepatitis B with or without previous known HBe antigen (HBeAg) viremic phase, and to assess the potential implication of precore mutants in HBeAg-negative reactivation after loss of HBeAg. Nineteen patients were studied: 7 had a previous HBeAg-positive phase and had spontaneous or therapeutically induced loss of HBeAg (group A); 12 had no previous HBeAg-positive phase (group B). Direct sequencing of PCR products was performed on serum collected during the anti-HBe-positive phase in the two groups. In group A, precore sequencing showed that 5 patients were infected by wild-type virus, 1 patient was infected with a precore mutant, and 1 patient was found to be infected by a mixture of wild-type and precore mutant viruses. In group B, precore sequencing showed that only 1 patient was infected with wild-type virus and that 11 were infected with precore mutants. In a few patients, the presence of HBeAg within immune complexes may explain HBeAg negativity. In conclusion, our results show that, in patients with anti-HBe-positive chronic hepatitis B: (1) precore mutations creating a stop codon are more frequently found in those without known previous HBeAg positivity; (2) after loss of HBeAg, the patients who have anti-HBe-positive reactivation are infected by wild-type virus, which suggests that reactivation is not related to precore mutations; (3) HBeAg negativity may be caused by immune complexes formation.

Long-term clinical and virological outcome after liver transplantation for cirrhosis caused by chronic delta hepatitis.

Liver transplantation for liver diseases related to hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) remains problematic because of the risk of viral recurrence. We report here the long-term virological outcome of patients transplanted for HDV-related liver cirrhosis (HDV cirrhosis). From December 1984 to December 1990, 76 patients with HDV cirrhosis underwent liver transplantation. Before transplantation, all the patients were HBsAg-positive/anti-HDV positive, and all but one were HBV DNA-negative by dot blot hybridization. HDV RNA was detected by HDV RT-PCR and liver HDAg by fluorescent HDV Ab. After transplantation, all the patients except four received continuous long-term anti-HBs passive immunoprophylaxis. The actuarial 5-year survival was 88%. All patients who did not receive anti-HBs immunoprophylaxis remained HBsAg-positive and developed hepatitis. Among the 68 patients receiving antiHBs immunoprophylaxis with a minimum follow-up of 2 months, HBsAg reappeared in 7 (10.3%) after a mean of 17 months. These seven patients developed hepatitis, with simultaneous HBV and HDV replication; and four cleared later HBsAg. Patients without HBV reinfection were studied for HDV reinfection: liver HD Ag or serum HDV RNA were present in 88% of the patients during the first year, without developing hepatitis; however, they were no longer detectable after 2 years in 95% of the patients. In conclusion, liver transplantation for HDV cirrhosis gives good results, with a 5-year actuarial survival of 88%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The course of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation.

Hepatitis C virus-induced liver disease is becoming a main indication for liver transplantation. Recurrence of hepatitis after transplantation has been reported, but its long-term consequences are unknown. Seventy-nine patients positive for hepatitis C virus (group 1) and 106 subjects negative for hepatitis C virus antibody (group 2) with a mean follow-up of 4 yr were retrospectively studied by means of serology, nested polymerase chain reaction and branched-DNA technology before and after liver transplantation. The actuarial rates of hepatitis C virus-related acute hepatitis were 72% and 20% at 4 yr in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Progression to chronic active hepatitis occurred in 61% and 36% of the subjects within 3 yr of the onset of recurrent and acquired hepatitis, respectively. No case of acute graft failure and two cases of cirrhosis were related to recurrent or acquired hepatitis C virus liver disease. Hepatitis C virus RNA levels were significantly increased in cases of hepatitis after transplantation. In contrast, the pretransplant hepatitis C virus RNA level was not predictive of recurrence. Our results establish the general persistence of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation, the frequency and the severe course of recurrent liver disease. However, liver transplantation in hepatitis C virus antibody-positive patients still has a good medium-term prognosis.