Lumbar spine: agreement in the interpretation of 1.5-T MR images by using the Nordic Modic Consensus Group classification form.

PURPOSE: To evaluate intra- and interobserver agreement for the interpretation of lumbar 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) images in a community setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study design was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Ramón y Cajal Hospital. According to Spanish law, for this type of study, no informed consent was necessary. Five radiologists from three hospitals twice interpreted lumbar MR examination results in 53 patients with low back pain, with at least a 14-day interval between assessments. Radiologists were unaware of the clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients and of their colleagues' assessments. At the second assessment, they were unaware of the results of the first assessment. Reports on Modic changes, osteophytes, Schmorl nodes, diffuse defects, disk degeneration, annular tears (high-signal-intensity zones), disk contour, spondylolisthesis, and spinal stenosis were collected by using the Spanish version of the Nordic Modic Consensus Group classification. The kappa statistic was used to assess intra- and interobserver agreement for findings with a prevalence of 10% or greater and 90% or lower. kappa was categorized as almost perfect (0.81-1.00), substantial (0.61-0.80), moderate (0.41-0.60), fair (0.21-0.40), slight (0.00-0.20), or poor (<0.00). RESULTS: Endplate erosions and spondylolisthesis were observed in less than 10% of images. Intraobserver reliability was almost perfect for spinal stenosis; substantial for Modic changes, Schmorl nodes, disk degeneration, annular tears, and disk contour; and moderate for osteophytes. Interobserver reliability was moderate for Modic changes, Schmorl nodes, disk degeneration, annular tears, and disk contour; fair for osteophytes; and poor for spinal stenosis. CONCLUSION: In conditions close to those of clinical practice, there was only moderate interobserver agreement in the reporting of findings at 1.5-T lumbar MR imaging. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.09090706/-/DC1.

The influence of psychological factors on low back pain-related disability in community dwelling older persons.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of fear avoidance beliefs (FAB) and catastrophizing on low back pain (LBP)-related disability in Spanish community dwelling retirees. DESIGN: Correlation between variables measured with previously validated instruments. SETTING: Majorca, Spain. PATIENTS: 1,044 community dwelling subjects attending conferences for retired persons. OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual analog scales for LBP and pain referred to the leg (LP), Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) for disability, FAB-Phys questionnaire (FABQ) for FAB, and the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) for catastrophizing. RESULTS: In subjects without clinically relevant LBP, FAB correlated moderately with catastrophizing (r = 0.535) and disability (r = 0.390), and weakly with LP (r = 0.119) and LBP (r = 0.197). In subjects with LBP, FAB correlated moderately with catastrophizing (r = 0.418) and disability (r = 0.408), and weakly with LP (0.152), but not with LBP. Correlations among CSQ, FABQ, and RMQ were similar in subjects with and without current LBP. In regression models, the coefficient for effect of FAB on disability was 0.14 for participants with no LBP, and 0.28 for those with pain. Corresponding values for catastrophizing were 0.17 and 0.19. CONCLUSION: In Spanish community dwelling retirees, the influence of FAB and catastrophizing on LBP-related disability is clinically small.

Relación entre hábitos de vida y calificaciones escolares en adolescentes / No disponible

Antecedentes: Diversos estudios han mostrado que elrendimiento académico de los adolescentes está estrechamentevinculado al consumo de alcohol y tabaco y a las horasque pasan viendo televisión. El objetivo del presente estudioes determinar la relación del tiempo viendo televisión,el tabaquismo y el consumo de alcohol con las calificacionesescolares de adolescentes de Mallorca, España.Métodos: Se registraron datos sobre la práctica de deportes,el consumo de alcohol y tabaco, el tiempo que pasanante el televisor y el número de asignaturas suspendidasen el último curso entre 7.361 escolares de 13 a 15años de edad. El nivel socioeconómico de la familia se determinóa partir de los datos proporcionados por los padresde los adolescentes. Mediante un análisis multivariantese identificaron las variables asociadas al hecho depresentar un mayor riesgo de suspender.Resultados: Las variables significativamente asociadas aproblemas académicos fueron: tabaco (odds ratio [OR] =2,64: intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 2,17-3,20); alcohol(OR = 1,58; IC del 95%: 1,34-1,87); ver más de 2 h detelevisión por día (OR = 1,42; IC del 95%: 1,19-1,69); procederdel nivel socioeconómico más bajo (OR = 5,72; ICdel 95%: 3,74-8,73) y tener más edad (OR = 1,23; IC del95%: 1,16-1,31). Las variables que se revelaron como positivamenteasociadas a un buen rendimiento académico fueron:practicar deportes a nivel competitivo (OR = 0,648; ICdel 95%: 0,594-0,787); practicar deportes más de 2 vecespor semana (OR = 0,820; IC del 95%: 0,712-0,945), y sermujer (OR = 0,422; IC del 95%: 0,373-0,477).Conclusiones: Entre los adolescentes españoles, fumar,beber alcohol, tener más años, ser varón, ver televisiónmás de 2 h al día y proceder de un nivel socioeconómicomás bajo están estrechamente asociados al fracaso escolar.Practicar deporte más de 2 veces por semana está asociadoa un mejor rendimiento académico

Background: Several studies have shown that academicperformance in adolescents is closely related to alcohol intake,smoking, and the number of hours spent watching television.The aim of the present study was to determine theassociation between the time spent watching television,smoking and alcohol intake with academic grades in adolescentsin Majorca (Spain).Methods: Data on sports activity, alcohol intake, smoking,the number of hours spent watching television and thenumber of subjects failed in the previous academic yearwere collected from 7,361 secondary school students aged13-15 years old. The family’s socioeconomic position wasdetermined by data provided by the adolescents’ parents.Multivariate analysis was used to identify the variables associatedwith a greater risk of failure.Results: The variables significantly associated with academicproblems were smoking (OR = 2.64; 95% CI: 2.17-3.20), alcohol intake (OR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.34-1.87), watchingmore than two hours of television per day (OR =1.42; 95% CI: 1.19-1.69), coming from a family with a lowsocioeconomic position (OR = 5.72; 95% CI: 3.74-8.73),and older age (OR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.16-1.31). The variablespositively associated with good academic performancewere practising sports at competition level (OR = 0.648;95% CI: 0.594-0.787), taking part in sports more than twicea week (OR = 0.820; 95% CI: 0.712-0.945), and femalesex (OR = 0.422; 95% CI: 0.373-0.477).Conclusions: Among Spanish adolescents, smoking, drinkingalcohol, older age, male sex, watching television formore than two hours per day, and low socioeconomic positionwere closely related to academic failure. Practisingsport more than twice a week was associated with betteracademic performance

A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies.

STUDY DESIGN: A modified Delphi study conducted with 28 experts in back pain research from 12 countries. OBJECTIVE: To identify standardized definitions of low back pain that could be consistently used by investigators in prevalence studies to provide comparable data. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Differences in the definition of back pain prevalence in population studies lead to heterogeneity in study findings, and limitations or impossibilities in comparing or summarizing prevalence figures from different studies. METHODS: Back pain definitions were identified from 51 articles reporting population-based prevalence studies, and dissected into 77 items documenting 7 elements. These items were submitted to a panel of experts for rating and reduction, in 3 rounds (participation: 76%). Preliminary results were presented and discussed during the Amsterdam Forum VIII for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain, compared with scientific evidence and confirmed and fine-tuned by the panel in a fourth round and the preparation of the current article. RESULTS: Two definitions were agreed on a minimal definition (with 1 question covering site of low back pain, symptoms observed, and time frame of the measure, and a second question on severity of low back pain) and an optimal definition that is made from the minimal definition and add-ons (covering frequency and duration of symptoms, an additional measure of severity, sciatica, and exclusions) that can be adapted to different needs. CONCLUSION: These definitions provide standards that may improve future comparisons of low back pain prevalence figures by person, place and time characteristics, and offer opportunities for statistical summaries.

Fear avoidance beliefs do not influence disability and quality of life in Spanish elderly subjects with low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Correlation between previously validated questionnaires. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of fear avoidance beliefs (FAB) with disability and quality of life in elderly Spanish subjects. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: As opposed to Anglo-Saxon and Northern European patients, in Spanish low back pain (LBP) patients of working age, the influence of FAB on disability and quality of life is sparse and much less than that of pain. The influence of FAB on LBP-related disability and quality of life in the elderly is unknown. METHODS: A visual analogue scale (VAS), the Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ), the FAB-Phys questionnaire (FABQ), and the SF-12 questionnaire were used to assess LBP, disability, fear avoidance beliefs, and quality of life in 661 institutionalized elderly in Spain, 439 of whom had LBP. RESULTS: In all subjects, FAB correlated with LBP (r = 0.477), disability (r = 0.458), the Physical Component Summary of SF-12 (PCS SF-12) (r = -0.389), and the Mental Component Summary of SF-12 (MCS SF-12) (r = -0.165). In subjects with LBP, FABs only correlated weakly with disability (r = -0.110). The stronger correlations were found between LBP and disability, both in all subjects (r = 0.803) and LBP patients (r = 0.445). Regression models including all the participants showed that the influence of FABs on physical quality of life was sparse and that FABs were not associated with either disability or mental quality of life. In elderly subjects with LBP, FABs were not associated with either disability or quality of life. CONCLUSION: In Spanish institutionalized elderly subjects, FABs only have a minor influence on physical quality of life, and none on disability or mental quality of life. In elderly subjects with LBP, differences in FABs are not associated with differences in disability or quality of life. Further studies should explore the potential value of FABs in the elderly in other settings.

Prognostic factors for neuroreflexotherapy in the treatment of subacute and chronic neck and back pain: a study of predictors of clinical outcome in routine practice of the Spanish National Health Service.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort follow-up study. OBJECTIVES: To refine the indication criteria for neuroreflexotherapy (NRT) in the treatment of subacute and chronic neck (NP), thoracic (TP) and low back pain (LBP) in the Spanish National Health Service (SNHS), by identifying prognostic factors for clinical outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: NRT consists of the temporary subcutaneous implantation of surgical devices in trigger points. Previous randomized controlled trials have shown its efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness for treating subacute and chronic LBP. Clinical audits in routine practice have shown similar results in NP, TP, and LBP patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 1514 patients from the SNHS in the Balearic Islands in which a NRT intervention was performed and who were discharged between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2005, were included in this study. Treatment failure was defined as a baseline score equivalent to or lower than the corresponding one at discharge for local pain, referred pain, or LBP-related disability. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed for each of those variables. Maximal models included reason for referral (NP, TP, or LBP), age, sex, baseline values for each variable, number of days in which the surgical devices used in NRT were left implanted, duration of the current episode, time elapsed since the first episode, and previous failed surgery for the current episode. Calibration of the models was assessed through the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, while discrimination was assessed through the area under the ROC curve and the Nagelkerke R test. RESULTS: When referred to NRT, patients' median (IQR) duration of the episode was 210 (90, 730) days. Failure rates ranged between 9.9% for local pain and 14.5% for disability. Variables associated with a worst prognosis for local pain, referred pain, and disability were surgical devices remaining implanted for a shorter duration and, especially, a longer pain duration. Patients referred for NP were more likely to improve than those referred for TP or LBP. Regarding the evolution of local and referred pain, lesser improvement was observed in the least severe complaint at baseline. Models showed a good calibration. The area under the ROC curve ranged between 0.719 and 0.804, and R ranged between 0.101 and 0.255. CONCLUSION: A longer duration of the current episode is the worst detected prognostic factor for response to NRT, but prognostic models are inaccurate for predicting the clinical outcome of a given patient. In order to improve the success rate of this technology, these results only support earlier referral for patients complying with current indication criteria.

A comparison of two short education programs for improving low back pain-related disability in the elderly: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Cluster randomized clinical trial. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of 2 minimal education programs for improving low back pain (LBP)-related disability in the elderly. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No education program has shown effectiveness on low back pain (LBP)-related disability in the elderly. METHODS: A total of 129 nursing homes (6389 residents) in northern Spain were invited to participate in the study. The actual participants were 12 nursing homes randomly assigned to 3 groups and 661 subjects. An independent physician gave a 20-minute talk with slide projections summarizing the content of the Back Book (active management group), the Back Guide (postural hygiene group), and a pamphlet on cardiovascular health (controls). Disability was measured with the Roland-Morris questionnaire (RMQ). Blind assessments were performed before the intervention, and 30 and 180 days later. The effect of the intervention on disability was estimated by generalized mixed linear random effects models. RESULTS: Mean age of participants ranged between 79.9 and 81.2 years. Disability improved in all groups, but at the 30-day assessment the postural education group showed an additional improvement of 1.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-1.9), RMQ points and at the 180-day assessment the active education group an additional improvement of 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.6-3.4). In the subset of subjects with LBP when entering the study, postural education had no advantages over controls, while an additional improvement of 3.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.5- 4.5) RMQ points at the 180-day assessment was observed in the active education group. CONCLUSION: In institutionalized elderly, the handing out of the Back Book supported by a 20-minute group talk improves disability 6 months later, and is even more effective in those subjects with LBP.

Non-specific low back pain in primary care in the Spanish National Health Service: a prospective study on clinical outcomes and determinants of management.

BACKGROUND: The Spanish National Health Service is a universal and free health care system. Non-specific low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent disorder, generating large health and social costs. The objectives of this study were to describe its management in primary care, to assess patient characteristics that influence physicians' decisions, and to describe clinical outcome at 2 months. METHODS: A cross-sectional sample of 648 patients with non-specific low back pain was recruited by 75 physicians (out of 361-20.8%) working in 40 primary care centers in 10 of the 17 administrative regions in Spain, covering 693,026 out of the 40,499,792 inhabitants. Patients were assessed on the day they were recruited, and prospectively followed-up 14 and 60 days later. The principal patient characteristics that were analyzed were: sex, duration of the episode, history of LBP, working status, severity of LBP, leg pain and disability, and results of straight leg raising test. Descriptors of management were: performance of the straight leg raising test, ordering of diagnostic procedures, prescription of drug treatment, referral to physical therapy, rehabilitation or surgery, and granting of sick leave. Regression analysis was used to analyze the relationship between patients' baseline characteristics and physicians' management decisions. Only workers were included in the models on sick leave. RESULTS: Mean age (SD) of included patients was 46.5 (15.5) years, 367 (56.6%) were workers, and 338 (52.5%) were females. Median (25th-75th interquartile range) duration of pain when entering the study was 4 (2-10) days and only 28 patients (4.3%) had chronic low back pain. Diagnostic studies included plain radiographs in 43.1% of patients and CT or MRI scans in 18.8%. Drug medication was prescribed to 91.7% of patients, 19.1% were sent to physical therapy or rehabilitation, and 9.6% were referred to surgery. The main determinants of the clinical management were duration of the episode and, to a lesser extent, the intensity of the pain (especially leg pain), a positive straight leg raising test, and degree of disability. The main determinant of sick leave was the degree of disability, followed by the characteristics of the labor contract and the intensity of leg pain (but not low back pain). After at least 2 months of treatment, 37% of patients were still in pain and approximately 10% of patients had not improved or had worsened. CONCLUSION: Although the use of X-Rays is high, determinants of physicians' management of LBP in primary care made clinical sense and were consistent with patterns suggested by evidence-based recommendations. However, after 2 months of treatment more than one third of patients continued to have back pain and about 10% had worsened.

Effect of firmness of mattress on chronic non-specific low-back pain: randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: A firm mattress is commonly believed to be beneficial for low-back pain, although evidence supporting this recommendation is lacking. We assessed the effect of different firmnesses of mattresses on the clinical course of patients with chronic non-specific low-back pain. METHODS: In a randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial, we assessed 313 adults who had chronic non-specific low-back pain, but no referred pain, who complained of backache while lying in bed and on rising. Mattress firmness is rated on a scale developed by the European Committee for Standardisation. The H(s) scale starts at 1.0 (firmest) and stops at 10.0 (softest). We randomly assigned participants firm mattresses (H(s)=2.3) or medium-firm mattresses (H(s)=5.6). We did clinical assessments at baseline and at 90 days. Primary endpoints were improvements in pain while lying in bed, pain on rising, and disability. FINDINGS: At 90 days, patients with medium-firm mattresses had better outcomes for pain in bed (odds ratio 2.36 [95% CI 1.13-4.93]), pain on rising (1.93 [0.97-3.86]), and disability (2.10 [1.24-3.56]) than did patients with firm mattresses. Throughout the study period, patients with medium-firm mattresses also had less daytime low-back pain (p=0.059), pain while lying in bed (p=0.064), and pain on rising (p=0.008) than did patients with firm mattresses. INTERPRETATION: A mattress of medium firmness improves pain and disability among patients with chronic non-specific low-back pain.

Risk factors for non-specific low back pain in schoolchildren and their parents: a population based study.

A survey of adolescent schoolchildren and their parents through a self-administered questionnaire was conducted to determine the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) in schoolchildren and their parents and to assess its association with exposure to known and presumed risk factors. A previously validated, self-administered questionnaire was used for collecting information on back pain history, anthropometric measures, physical and sports activity, academic problems, hours of leisure sitting, smoking, and alcohol intake. Schoolchildren between the ages of 13 and 15 in schools of the island of Mallorca and their parents (n=16,394) took part in the study. The lifetime prevalence of LBP was 50.9% for boys and 69.3% for girls; point prevalence (7 days) was 17.1% for boys and 33% for girls. There was a significant association with LBP and pain in bed (OR=13.82, 95% CI: 10.47-18.25, P<0.001), reporting scoliosis (OR=2.87, 95% CI: 2.45-3.37, P<0.001), reporting difference in leg length (OR=1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.56, P=0.033), practice of any sport more than twice a week (OR=1.23, 95% CI: 1.09-1.39, P=0.001) and being female (OR=1.11, 95% CI: 1.04-1.19, P=0.001). There was no association found between LBP and body mass index, the manner in which books were transported, hours of leisure sitting, alcohol intake or cigarette smoking. Among parents, the lifetime prevalence of LBP was 78.2% for mothers and 62.6% for fathers; point prevalence (7 days) was 41% for mothers and 24.3% for fathers, and there were significant associations with LBP and pain in bed (OR=18.07, 95% CI: 14.72-22.19, P<0.001), report of scoliosis (OR=8.77, 95% CI: 6.44-11.95, P<0.001), report of difference in leg length (OR=2.21, 95% CI: 1.60-3.04, P<0.001), being a university graduate (OR=1.89, 95% CI: 1.21-2.98, P=0.006), being female (OR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.33-1.67, P<0.001), and swimming (OR=1.10, 95% CI: 1.4-1.18, P=0.002). There was no association found between LBP and alcohol intake, cigarette smoking or the practice of other sports. Although there was a positive association in terms of scoliosis between biological parents and their children (P<0.001), there was no association found in familial (biological or not) occurrence of LBP. The prevalence of LBP among adolescents in southern Europe is similar to northern Europe, it is comparable to that in adults, and is associated with several factors. There is a strong association between pain in bed or upon rising in both adolescents and adults. Scoliosis, but not LBP, appears to be related to heredity. Further longitudinal studies are necessary to establish risk factors that are predictive for LBP in adolescents.

Validation of the spanish version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire.

STUDY DESIGN: Validation of a translated, culturally adapted questionnaire. OBJECTIVES: To translate and culturally adapt the Spanish version of the Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ), and to validate its use for assessing disability in Spanish patients with low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The RMQ is a reliable evaluation instrument for disability, but no validated Spanish version is available. METHODS: Translation/retranslation of the English version of the RMQ was done blindly and independently by four different individuals, and adapted by a team that included five primary care physicians, three back specialists, and two methodologists. The study was done in the primary care setting in Mallorca, with 195 patients who visited their physician for acute or chronic LBP: 50 in the pilot study and 145 in the validation study. Individuals were given the RMQ and three other scales (VAS, Oswestry, and EuroQol) on their first visit and 14 days later. For the pilot study, on the first visit, patients were also given a second RMQ with the questions in a different order and they were subsequently asked for comprehension of each item of the questionnaire. RESULTS: Only 2 questions were partially rephrased after the pilot study, and no request for aid in interpretation was made during the validation study. Scores of the two RMQs on day 1 were 10.04 (SD, 5.01) and 10.9 (SD, 4.8), with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.874. The 95% limits of agreement by the Bland-Altman method was 0.340 +/- 4.81. Cronbach's alpha was 0.8375 (day 1) and 0.9140 (day 15) in the validation. Concurrent validity, measured by comparing RMQ responses with the results of VAS, was r = 0.347 (P = 0.0000) for day 1,and r = 0.570 (P = 0.0000) for day 15. Construct validity, tested by determining the correlation between the Spanish RMQ and the Spanish adaptation of the Oswestry Questionnaire, yielded r = 0.197 (P = 0.0061) on day 1 and r = 0.341 (P = 0.0000) on day 15. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the RMQ has good comprehensibility, internal consistency, and reliability, and is an adequate and useful instrument for the assessment of disability caused by LBP.

Un estudio necesario, pero un 'Comité de Expertos' superfluo / A necessary study, but a superfluous 'Expert Committee'

No disponible