A case of COVID-19 with multiple cranial neuropathies.

Various neurological manifestations involving the central and peripheral nervous system have been reported in association with COVID-19. Most common associations reported are encephalopathy, headache, ischemic, hemorrhagic stroke and transient ischemic attack, Miller Fisher syndrome, cranial neuropathies and Guillain-Barre syndrome. Of the cranial neuropathies, anosmia, and dysgeusia are the most common reported symptoms. This is a case of COVID-19 with ipsilateral fifth and seventh cranial nerve involvement with complete resolution of symptoms over a period of 3 weeks. The neurological symptoms started within 5 days of respiratory symptoms. We conclude that isolated cranial neuropathies can be the manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Neuromodulation in Intractable Epilepsy Through Responsive Vagal Nerve Stimulation: A Three-Year Retrospective Study at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.

BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) functions through neuromodulatory mechanisms to provide quality of life improvements to those with drug-resistant epilepsy. Responsive VNS (rVNS) generators are designed to further reduce seizure burden by detecting ictal tachycardia and aborting seizures soon after their onset.  Methods: Electronic medical records were accessed from January 2015 to December 2018 to identify patients with epilepsy managed with rVNS generators. Data were collected on seizure burden before and after rVNS implantation. Seizure burden was compared using t-tests, and monthly seizure reductions were gauged with the McHugh scale. Twenty-seven individuals met inclusion criteria; 10 were eliminated due to prior VNS implantation or undocumented seizure frequencies. RESULTS: The average seizure burden prior to rVNS implantation was 24.78 seizures/month. Following generator placement, the mean seizure frequencies at three months, six months, 12 months, and 18 months were 6.81, 16.57, 5.65, and 5.78 seizures/month, respectively. However, despite documented reductions in the average monthly seizure frequency, we found no statistically significant differences in seizure frequency relative to baseline. CONCLUSION: While many participants showed individual reductions in seizure burden, this study was unable to definitively conclude that rVNS therapy leads to statistically significant reduction in seizure burden.

Classification of Covert Brain Infarct Subtype and Risk of Death and Vascular Events.

Background and Purpose- To test the hypothesis that covert brain infarcts (CBIs) are more likely to be located in noneloquent brain areas compared with clinical strokes and that CBI etiological subtypes carry a differential risk of vascular events compared with people without CBI. Methods- We used brain magnetic resonance imaging from 1290 stroke-free participants in the NOMAS (Northern Manhattan Study) to evaluate for CBI. We classified CBI as cardioembolic (ie, known atrial fibrillation), large artery atherosclerosis (extracranial and intracranial), penetrating artery disease, and cryptogenic (no apparent cause). CBI localized in the nonmotor areas of the right hemisphere were considered noneloquent. We then evaluated risk of events by CBI subtype with adjusted Cox proportional models. Results- At the time of magnetic resonance imaging, 236 participants (18%) had CBI (144 [61%] distal cryptogenic, 29 [12%] distal cardioembolic, 26 [11%] large artery atherosclerosis, and 37 [16%] penetrating artery disease). Smaller (per mm, odds ratio, 0.8 [0.8-0.9]) and nonbrain stem infarcts (odds ratio, 0.2 [0.1-0.6]) were more likely to be covert. During the follow-up period (10.4±3.1 years), 398 (31%) died (162 [13%] of vascular death) and 117 (9%) had a stroke (99 [85%]) were ischemic. Risks of events varied by CBI subtype, with the highest risk of stroke (hazard ratio, 2.2 [1.3-3.7]) and vascular death (hazard ratio, 2.24 [1.29-3.88]) noted in participants with intracranial large artery atherosclerosis-related CBI. Conclusions- CBI can be classified into subtypes that have differential outcomes. Certain CBI subtypes such as those related to intracranial large artery atherosclerosis have a high risk of adverse vascular outcomes and could warrant consideration of treatment trials.