Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci ; 72(6): 811-817, 2017 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28329147

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Spouses of Alzheimer's disease patients (AD spouses) may experience substantial health effects associated with their partner's chronic cognitive and behavioral dysfunction. Studies examining associations between the medical experiences of AD spouses in the period before and after their partner's AD diagnosis are limited, particularly those which measure health care resource use and cost. METHODS: AD patients were identified through multiple Medicare claims containing an AD diagnostic code. Their spouses were identified through special coding in the Medicare eligibility records. The AD spouses were matched demographically to the spouses of Medicare beneficiaries without a history of AD. Longitudinal and annual cross-sectional Medicare cost comparisons utilized log-transformed linear regression. The longitudinal period of observation began 12 months before the AD patient's initial claim listing AD and continued for up to 38 months afterwards. RESULTS: The study identified 16,322 AD spouses. Total per person costs were 24% higher in AD spouses than in the controls ($694/month vs $561/month). AD spouses' excess costs began 3 months before their partners' AD diagnoses and continued for ≥30 months. Being an AD spouse predicted 29% higher Medicare costs after adjustment for chronic health status (P < .001). Increasing AD patient care complexity had a substantial impact on AD spouse Medicare costs (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study documents a link between the health status of AD spouses and AD patients. Additional research is required to elicit the mechanism behind the association between AD spouse and AD patient diagnosis.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/epidemiologia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare , Cônjuges/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Formulário de Reclamação de Seguro , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Casas de Saúde , Análise de Regressão , Cônjuges/psicologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
J Med Econ ; 20(2): 151-161, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27574722

RESUMO

AIM: To assess the cost-effectiveness of first-line pemetrexed/platinum and other commonly administered regimens in a representative US elderly population with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study utilized the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registry linked to Medicare claims records. The study population included all SEER-Medicare patients diagnosed in 2008-2009 with advanced non-squamous NSCLC (stages IIIB-IV) as their only primary cancer and who started chemotherapy within 90 days of diagnosis. The study evaluated the four most commonly observed first-line regimens: paclitaxel/carboplatin, platinum monotherapy, pemetrexed/platinum, and paclitaxel/carboplatin/bevacizumab. Overall survival and total healthcare cost comparisons as well as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for pemetrexed/platinum vs each of the other three. Unstratified analyses and analyses stratified by initial disease stage were conducted. RESULTS: The final study population consisted of 2,461 patients. Greater administrative censorship of pemetrexed recipients at the end of the study period disproportionately reduced the observed mean survival for pemetrexed/platinum recipients. The disease stage-stratified ICER analysis found that the pemetrexed/platinum incurred total Medicare costs of $536,424 and $283,560 per observed additional year of life relative to platinum monotherapy and paclitaxel/carboplatin, respectively. The pemetrexed/platinum vs triplet comparator analysis indicated that pemetrexed/platinum was associated with considerably lower total Medicare costs, with no appreciable survival difference. LIMITATIONS: Limitations included differential censorship of the study regimen recipients and differential administration of radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed/platinum yielded either improved survival at increased cost or similar survival at reduced cost relative to comparator regimens in the treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Limitations in the study methodology suggest that the observed pemetrexed survival benefit was likely conservative.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/economia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Medicare , Padrões de Prática Médica , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Estatísticos , Sistema de Registros , Programa de SEER , Estados Unidos
3.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord ; 29(4): 330-7, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25635340

RESUMO

Despite its implications on the personal and policy level, little is currently known about the specific diagnostic pathways that patients with cognitive impairment (CI) pass through before being diagnosed with Alzheimer disease (AD). Four major diagnostic pathways were identified in the Medicare claims records for 2001 to 2006: AD as initial diagnosis, cognitive disturbance followed by AD; dementia with suspected etiologies followed by AD; dementia without known cause followed by AD; and 1 triple pathway, cognitive disturbance followed by dementia without known cause followed by AD. For all of these pathways, previously low medical costs peaked during patients' month of initial diagnosis and then declined to a level substantially higher than before. The 3 CI pathways that transition to AD included another peak in costs when a secondary AD diagnosis occurred. Each time, inpatient and skilled nursing facility services were major cost contributors. The primary diagnoses on Medicare claims for the AD event were usually comorbidities rather than CI. A linear regression model adjusting for demographic factors, selected comorbidities, and overall frailty found that the transitional CI diagnoses were significant independent cost determinants. They increased Medicare expenditures by an estimated $4600 to $14,200 relative to patients whose initial CI diagnosis was AD.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Doença de Alzheimer/economia , Medicare/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença de Alzheimer/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
JAMA Psychiatry ; 72(2): 179-88, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25588123

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: More than 1 in 5 disabled people with dual Medicare-Medicaid enrollment have schizophrenia or a bipolar disorder (ie, a serious mental illness). The effect of their transition from Medicaid drug coverage, which varies in generosity across states, to the Medicare Part D drug benefit is unknown. Many thousands make this transition annually. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of transitioning from Medicaid drug benefits to Medicare Part D on medication use by patients with a serious mental illness and to determine the influence of Medicaid drug caps. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In time-series analysis of continuously enrolled patient cohorts (2004-2007), we estimated changes in medication use before and after transitioning to Part D, comparing states that capped monthly prescription fills with states with no prescription limits. We used Medicaid and Medicare claims from a 5% national sample of community-dwelling, nonelderly disabled dual enrollees with schizophrenia (n = 5554) or bipolar disorder (n = 3675). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Psychotropic treatments included antipsychotics for schizophrenia and antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, and lithium for bipolar disorder. We measured monthly rates of untreated illness, intensity of treatment, and overall prescription medication use. RESULTS: Prior to Part D, the prevalence of untreated illness among patients with a bipolar disorder was 30.0% in strict-cap states and 23.8% in no-cap states. In strict-cap states, the proportion of untreated patients decreased by 17.2% (relatively) 1 year after Part D, whereas there was no change in the proportion of untreated patients in no-cap states. For patients with schizophrenia, the untreated rate (20.6%) did not change in strict-cap states, yet it increased by 23.3% (from 11.6%) in no-cap states. Overall medication use increased substantially after Part D in strict-cap states: prescription fills were 35.5% higher among patients with a bipolar disorder and 17.7% higher than predicted among schizophrenic patients; overall use in no-cap states was unchanged in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The effects of transitioning from Medicaid to Medicare Part D on essential treatment of serious mental illness vary by state. Transition to Part D in states with strict drug benefit limits may reduce rates of untreated illness among patients with bipolar disorders, who have high levels of overall medication use. Access to antipsychotic treatment may decrease after Part D for patients with a serious mental illness living in states with relatively generous uncapped Medicaid coverage.


Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/economia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/economia , Medicaid/economia , Medicare Part D/economia , Psicotrópicos/economia , Esquizofrenia/economia , Adulto , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare Part D/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Psicotrópicos/uso terapêutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 14: 291, 2014 Jul 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25001114

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The burden experienced by spouses of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) may have negative consequences for their physical health. We describe here a method for analyzing United States Medicare records to determine the changes in health service use and costs experienced by spouses after their marital partner receives an AD diagnosis. METHODS: We initially identified all beneficiaries in the 2001-2005 Medicare 5% sample who had multiple claims listing the ICD-9 diagnostic code for AD, 331.0. The 5% sample includes spouses who share a Medicare account with their marital partners because they lack a sufficient work history for full eligibility on their own. A matched cohort study assessed incremental health costs in the spouses of AD patients versus a control group of spouses of non-AD patients. Longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses tracked the impact of a patient's AD diagnosis on his or her spouse's healthcare costs. RESULTS: Our method located 54,593 AD patients of whom 11.5% had spouses identifiable via a shared Medicare account. AD diagnosis in one member of a couple was associated with significantly higher monthly Medicare payments for the other member's healthcare. The spouses' elevated costs commenced 2 to 3 months before their partners' AD diagnosis and persisted over the follow-up period. After 31 months, the cumulative additional Medicare reimbursements totaled a mean $4,600 in the spouses of AD patients. This excess was significant even after accounting for differences in baseline health status between the cohorts. CONCLUSION: The study methodology provides a framework for comprehensively evaluating medical costs of both chronically ill patients and their spouses. This method also provides monthly data, which makes possible a longitudinal evaluation of the cost effects of specific health events. The observed correlations provide a coherent demonstration of the interdependence between AD patients' and spouses' health. Future research should examine caregiving burden and other possible factors contributing to the AD spouses' health outcomes. It should also extend the method presented here to evaluations of other chronic diseases of the elderly.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/economia , Gastos em Saúde , Medicare/economia , Cônjuges , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Doença de Alzheimer/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Idoso Fragilizado , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
Value Health ; 14(1): 61-9, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21211487

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Although the global rate of multiple sclerosis (MS) is low, a few studies have documented high costs. Costs are highly variable depending on MS stage. This study was designed to assess the economic burden of Medicare-eligible patients by MS type in the United States using a claims-based classification algorithm to examine cost variation by disease stage. METHODS: A sample of 2003 to 2006 Medicare patients was selected. Cases were classified as pre-existing progressive MS or pre-existing relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS); the latter were further subdivided into relapsing, remitting, or stable. RESULTS: The sample had 5044 MS subjects, of whom 34.4% had prevalent progressive MS and 65.6% had prevalent RRMS. There were many chronic, comorbid conditions. The mean all-cause Medicare expenditures (not including self-administered medications) per person-year for MS in 2006 were $23,630 for prevalent progressive patients and $5887 for prevalent RRMS patients. Within the RRMS type, Medicare expenditures per person per month in 2006 were $1418 for relapsing patients, $608 for remitting patients, and $331 for stable patients. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial cost advantages to Medicare for keeping RRMS patients in a stable health state and in keeping them from advancing in disability severity. The overall cost advantage would be diminished by the large cost burden of comorbidity, which would likely remain fixed with improved MS therapies.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Medicare/economia , Esclerose Múltipla Crônica Progressiva/economia , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econométricos , Análise Multivariada , Análise de Regressão , Estados Unidos
7.
Health Serv Res ; 44(3): 1010-28, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19291168

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of a soft cap (a ceiling on utilization beyond which insured enrollees pay a higher copayment) on low-income elders' use of prescription drugs. DATA SOURCES AND SETTING: Claims and enrollment files for the first year ( June 2002 through May 2003) of the Illinois SeniorCare program, a state pharmacy assistance program, and Medicare claims and enrollment files, 2001 through 2003. SeniorCare enrolled non-Medicaid-eligible elders with income less than 200 percent of Federal Poverty Level. Minimal copays increased by 20 percent of prescription cost when enrollee expenditures reached $1,750. RESEARCH DESIGN: Models were estimated for three dependent variables: enrollees' average monthly utilization (number of prescriptions), spending, and the proportion of drugs that were generic rather than brand. Observations included all program enrollees who exceeded the cap and covered two periods, before and after the cap was exceeded. PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: On average, enrollees exceeding the cap reduced the number of drugs they purchased by 14 percent, monthly expenditures decreased by 19 percent, and the proportion generic increased by 4 percent, all significant at p<.01. Impacts were greater for enrollees with greater initial spending, for enrollees without one of five chronic illness diagnoses in the previous calendar year, and for enrollees with lower income. CONCLUSIONS: Near-poor elders enrolled in plans with caps or coverage gaps, including Part D plans, may face sharp declines in utilization when they exceed these thresholds.


Assuntos
Custo Compartilhado de Seguro/economia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/economia , Assistência Médica/economia , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Planos Governamentais de Saúde/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Controle de Custos , Uso de Medicamentos/economia , Medicamentos Genéricos/economia , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Illinois , Formulário de Reclamação de Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicare Part D/economia , Modelos Econométricos , Pobreza/economia , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
8.
Am J Public Health ; 97(6): 1053-9, 2007 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17463389

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The 1996 introduction of antiretroviral medications changed Medicare's role in providing HIV care. We analyzed Medicare's patient database in an effort to document the new HIV therapies' effects on expenditures and outcomes. METHODS: We examined the medical billing records of a 5% national Medicare sample from 1997 through 2003. The cohort was stratified by year and categorized by age, race/ethnicity, gender, and Medicare status. Population summaries were categorized according to presence of major chronic diseases and HIV-related conditions. RESULTS: The number of Medicare beneficiaries with HIV increased from 42520 in 1997 to 76500 in 2003, whereas mortality among this group fell by 35%. HIV-associated infections declined by as much as 43% (mycoses). Heart and liver disease and diabetes increased by more than 50%. Adjusted annual per person Medicare expenditures fell 28%; expenditures were 49% higher for Blacks than for Whites. CONCLUSIONS: Improved HIV medical management has led to fewer deaths and has shifted treatment toward chronic care. However, successful management is complicated by conditions that have not been historically linked to HIV and whose effects vary according to race/ethnicity.


Assuntos
Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade/economia , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Medicare/economia , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Pessoas com Deficiência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/etnologia , Infecções por HIV/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Regressão , Estados Unidos
9.
Ment Retard ; 44(3): 212-23, 2006 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16677066

RESUMO

Childhood injuries lead to increased morbidity and result in significant costs to public insurance programs. People with mental retardation, most of whom are covered by Medicaid, are at high risk for injury, which has implications for community inclusion, a central policy goal. Medicaid data from inpatient, outpatient, and long-term care settings represent an important new resource for injury surveillance in this population. Injury prevalence for 8.4 million Medicaid-eligible children in 26 states was measured using 1999 eligibility and claims data; 36.9% Medicaid beneficiaries ages 1 to 20 with mental retardation had at least one injury claim as compared with 23.5% of those without mental retardation. Prevalence rates are reported by gender and age for a variety of injury types.


Assuntos
Deficiência Intelectual/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Formulário de Reclamação de Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância da População , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos , Ferimentos e Lesões/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...