Impact of a sepsis tracking sheet and emergency department pharmacists on sepsis compliance measures: a prospective emergency department analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Compliance with core sepsis measures in Emergency Departments (ED) remains low, with a limited number of prospective trials highlighting strategies for improvement. METHODS: A prospective historically case-controlled observational analysis assessing the pre- and post -intervention impact of a sepsis tracking sheet (STS) and the involvement of ED pharmacists. PrimaryThe primary outcome was the improvement in compliance with core sepsis measures. SecondaryThe secondary outcome was to assess the frequency of respiratory interventions and mortality with pre-defined strata of fluid resuscitation (≤ 10, 10-20, 20-30, 30, ≥ 30 cc/kg of ideal body weight). RESULTS: 194 patients were enrolled over a six -month period with a 9.3% all-cause mortality and a 10.3% rate of new respiratory interventions after fluid boluses. Post-STS implementation compliance of repeat lactate measurement was 88% (vs. 33% pre-STS), broad-spectrum antibiotic administration within 3 h of presentation improved to 96% (vs. 20% pre-STS), blood cultures were drawn on 98% of patients (vs. 9% pre-STS), and 30 cc/kg fluid boluses were administered to 39% of patients (vs. 25% pre-STS). Of the 18 deaths and 21 respiratory interventions, only two patients fell into both categories. Mortality was highest in those patients that received greater than 30 cc/kg of fluid resuscitation (50%). Respiratory interventions were greatest in the strata receiving 10-20 cc/kg of fluids (47.6%). Patients receiving the lowest fluid aliquots of < 10 cc/kg had the highest clinical severity scores but did not have higher rates of historical diagnoses of volume overload. CONCLUSION: The ED -based implementation of a sepsis tracking sheet and the involvement of dedicated ED pharmacists was effective in improving core measures of sepsis compliance. Patients receiving higher fluid aliquots did not experience higher rates of respiratory interventions, though had higher all-cause mortality. No relationship could be identified between patients getting lower aliquots of fluid and prior diagnoses of volume overload.

Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation.

This article explains the physiologic basis and fundamentals behind the technology of continuous positive airway pressure, bilevel positive airway pressure, and high flow nasal canula. Additionally, it explores some of the core literature behind their clinical applications. It will also compare HFNC with other noninvasive modalities for respiratory failure alongside clinical titration and weaning algorithms in the emergency department setting.

Subclavian atherectomy and angioplasty for coronary subclavian steal syndrome post CABG.

Coronary subclavian steal syndrome is an uncommon complication occurring in patients with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). We describe a case of a 69-year-old male with a remote history of CABG who presented with exertional left arm pain and angina. Computed Tomographic Angiography of the chest demonstrated a severe left proximal subclavian artery stenosis. The case demonstrates successful application of subclavian atherectomy with use of embolic protective device, alleviating the need of stent, for treatment of Coronary subclavian steal syndrome in patient with remote history of CABG.

Findings from a tandem clinician leadership intervention for emergency department cardiac arrest care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) care in the Emergency Department (ED) has had to be modified during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Scarce literature exists on comfort of clinicians (defined as physicians, nurses & advanced practice providers-APP's) in these new roles and their perceived understanding of new algorithms. METHODS: Routine CPA care in our ED was modified during the COVID-19 pandemic. This involved clinicians in shared leadership roles alongside COVID-19 specific changes to CPA algorithms. The new protocol was operationalized through a two-step educational intervention involving didactic education and in-situ simulations. Univariate analyses using student's t-test assessed effectiveness of this educational intervention with clinician comfort as team leaders and perceived knowledge as primary outcomes on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Subgroup analysis across physicians (attending & resident), nurses & APP's were also undertaken with an alpha of 0.05, and p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Secondary outcomes of task saturation, procedural safety and error prevention were also analyzed. RESULTS: Across 83 of 95 total participants, our primary outcome of clinician comfort in the team leader role improved from a mean value of 3.41 (SD: 1.23) pre-intervention to 4.11 (SD: 0.88) with a p-value <0.001 post intervention. Similar and statistically significant findings in clinician comfort were noted across all subgroups except attending physicians and APP's. Perceived knowledge increased from a mean value of 3.54 (SD: 1.06) pre-intervention to a mean value of 4.24 (SD: 0.67) with a p-value <0.001 post intervention. Similar and statistically significant findings in perceived knowledge were noted across all subgroups except APP's. Responses were registered in either the strongly agree or agree category with regards to task saturation (89%), procedural safety (93%) and error prevention (71%) across all clinicians post intervention. CONCLUSION: Our pilot investigation of the effectiveness of an educational intervention of a novel CPA protocol in the ED during the COVID-19 pandemic reached statistical significance with regards to clinician comfort in shared leadership roles and perceived knowledge. These findings suggest that the protocol is rapidly teachable, usable and can be efficiently disseminated across ED clinicians of varying experience, especially in pandemic settings. Further work regarding effectiveness of this new protocol in real life cardiac arrest scenarios is warranted.

Emergency department observation of mild traumatic brain injury with minor radiographic findings: shorter stays, less expensive, and no increased risk compared to hospital admission.

OBJECTIVE: The management of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) with minor radiographic findings traditionally involves hospital admission for monitoring, although this practice is expensive with unclear benefit. We implemented a protocol to manage these patients in our emergency department observation unit (EDOU), hypothesizing that this pathway was cost effective and not associated with any difference in clinical outcome. METHODS: mTBI patients with minor radiographic findings were managed under the EDOU protocol over a 3-year period from May 1, 2015 to April 30, 2018 (inclusions: ≥19 years old, isolated acute head trauma, normal neurological exam [except transient alteration in consciousness], and a computed tomography [CT] scan of the head with at least 1 of the following: cerebral contusions <1 cm in maximum extent, convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage, or closed, non-displaced skull fractures). These patients were retrospectively analyzed; clinical outcomes and charges were compared to a control cohort of matched mTBI hospital admissions over the preceding 3 years. RESULTS: Sixty patients were observed in the EDOU over the 3-year period, and 85 patients were identified for the control cohort. There were no differences in rate of radiographic progression, neurological exam change, or surgical intervention, and the overall incidence of hemorrhagic expansion was low in both groups. The EDOU group had a significantly faster time to interval CT scan (Mean Difference (MD) 3.92 hours, [95%CI 1.65, 6.19]), P = 0.001), shorter length of stay (MD 0.59 days [95% CI 0.29, 0.89], P = 0.001), and lower encounter charges (MD $3428.51 [95%CI 925.60, 5931.42], P = 0.008). There were no differences in 30-day re-admission, 30-day mortality, or delayed chronic subdural formation, although there was a high rate of loss to follow-up in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to hospital admission, observing mTBI patients with minor radiographic findings in the EDOU was associated with significantly shorter time to interval scanning, shorter length of stay, and lower encounter charges, but no difference in observed clinical outcome. The overall risk of hemorrhagic progression in this subset of mTBI was very low. Using this approach can reduce unnecessary admissions while potentially yielding patient care and economic benefits. When designing a protocol, close attention should be given to clear inclusion criteria and a formal mechanism for patient follow-up.