RESUMO
We aimed to evaluate how the need for social services programs is associated with outcomes amongst patients with cervical cancer undergoing chemoradiation with a single institution, retrospective analysis of patients from January 1, 2015-July 31, 2018. Demographic, clinical, and social services utilization data were collected. Descriptive statistics and Chi-squared tests were performed. Kaplan-Meier curves estimated progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Among 117 eligible patients, median household income was $45,782 ($19,771 - $96,222). There was no difference in stage among income cohorts. Uninsured/publically insured patients had a higher stage at diagnosis than those privately insured (p = 0.003). Patients used 0-5 assistance programs during treatment. 77.6% of low income versus 54.2% of high income patients utilized ≥1 program. Assistance with lodging was utilized more often in low than high income patients. (36.2% vs 15.7%, p = 0.013). 58.3% of patients completed therapy in less than 56 days. Patients who completed therapy in >56 days utilized 1.44 social services while patients completing in ≤56 days used 1.06 (p = 0.102). Social security disability utilization trended towards completion times >56 days (p = 0.064). There was no difference in PFS or OS based on income or social services utilized. Financial toxicities associated with therapy are not limited to uninsured/publically insured or low income patients as over 50% of high income patients utilized at least one service. Additionally, the trend towards significance between enrollment in disability and completion of chemoradiation >56 days may highlight a group of at risk patients who need additional support.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients who did not enroll on a clinical trial and identify barriers that may limit enrollment among patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) presenting for first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with stage II-IV EOC from 10/2009-4/2013, a time period during which multiple trials were available to all EOC patients, including optimally debulked, suboptimally debulked, or undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Enrollment status, demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment details were recorded. SAS version 9.3 was used for all analyses. RESULTS: 144 patients met study criteria; 67% were enrolled on a trial. Enrolled patients were significantly younger (median 61 vs 68years, p=0.002). Stage (p=0.30), race (p=0.75), and performance status (p=0.38) were similar between enrolled and non-enrolled patients. Distance did not impact enrollment, as nearly half of patients in both groups lived >50miles from the treatment center (39.0% vs 47.8%, p=0.36). Mode of chemotherapy administration significantly differed based on participation (all p<0.05). Despite similar residual disease status (p=1.00) and number of chemotherapy regimens received (p=0.59), patients treated on trial had a higher 3-year survival rate (70.7% vs 51.7%, p=0.031). The difference in median progression-free survival approached significance (20.2 vs 9.2months, p=0.091). CONCLUSION: In an institution where the culture is to offer clinical trials to all eligible patients, 33% of front-line EOC patients did not participate. Increasing age was associated with non-participation. Modifiable barriers must be overcome so that trial enrollment can better reflect true EOC demographics.
