Familiarity, personality, and foraging performance in three-spined sticklebacks.

Animals can gain large benefits from living in groups but must coordinate with their groupmates in order to do so. Social interactions between groupmates drive overall group coordination and are influenced by the characteristics of individual group members. In particular, consistent inter-individual differences in behaviour (e.g. boldness) and familiarity between individuals in groups profoundly affect the individual interactions that mediate group coordination. However, the effects of boldness and familiarity have mostly been studied in isolation. Here we describe how familiarity and boldness interact to affect individual performance, leadership, and group coordination in small shoals of three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) solving a novel foraging task. Groups of higher average boldness were less cohesive, but only when group members were familiar with one another. Familiarity affected shy and bold individuals' foraging performance and leadership tendencies differently depending on group characteristics: the shyest group member experienced declining foraging success and leadership with increased group boldness in familiar groups, but experienced the opposite effect on foraging and no effect on leadership in unfamiliar groups. The boldest group member, in contrast, exhibited the opposite pattern: leading and eating more with increasing group boldness in familiar groups, but eating less with increasing group boldness in unfamiliar groups. These results suggest that both boldness and familiarity are important for establishing group behaviour and coordination, and that consistent inter-individual differences in behaviour may primarily impact group coordination once familiarity has been established.

Coping with strangers: how familiarity and active interactions shape group coordination in Corydoras aeneus.

Social groups composed of familiar individuals exhibit better coordination than unfamiliar groups; however, the ways familiarity contributes to coordination are poorly understood. Prior social experience probably allows individuals to learn the tendencies of familiar group-mates and respond accordingly. Without prior experience, individuals would benefit from strategies for enhancing coordination with unfamiliar others. We used a social catfish, Corydoras aeneus, that uses discrete, observable tactile interactions to assess whether active interactions could facilitate coordination, and how their role might be mediated by familiarity. We describe this previously understudied physical interaction, 'nudges', and show it to be associated with group coordination and cohesion. Furthermore, we investigated nudging and coordination in familiar/unfamiliar pairs. In all pairs, we found that nudging rates were higher during coordinated movements than when fish were together but not coordinating. We observed no familiarity-based difference in coordination or cohesion. Instead, unfamiliar pairs exhibited significantly higher nudging rates, suggesting that unfamiliar pairs may be able to compensate for unfamiliarity through increased nudging. By contrast, familiar individuals coordinated with comparatively little nudging. Second, we analysed nudging and cohesion within triplets of two familiar and one unfamiliar individual (where familiar individuals had a choice of partner). Although all individuals nudged at similar rates, the unfamiliar group-mate was less cohesive than its familiar group-mates and spent more time alone. Unfamiliar individuals that nudged their group-mates more frequently exhibited higher cohesion, indicating that nudging may facilitate cohesion for the unfamiliar group-mate. Overall, our results suggest that nudges can mitigate unfamiliarity, but that their usage is reduced in the case of familiar individuals, implying a cost is associated with the behaviour.