Do sick newborn infants benefit from participation in a randomized clinical trial?

BACKGROUND: Adult participants in randomized controlled trials often have better outcomes than patients who are eligible but not enrolled. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether newborn infants who were allocated to placebo in an investigational drug trial had better outcomes than infants who were eligible but not randomized (eligible NR). STUDY DESIGN: During a randomized controlled trial of antithrombin therapy in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome, data were collected prospectively on all 76 infants in the eligible NR group. Study outcomes were compared with those of all 61 infants who were randomized to placebo. The same exogenous surfactant was used in all patients. RESULTS: In the placebo group the mean (SD) birth weight was 1201 (314) g, mean (SD) gestational age was 28.8 (2.3) weeks, and 51% were male. In infants in the eligible NR group, mean (SD) birth weight was 1141 (262) g, mean (SD) gestational age was 28.3 (2. 3) weeks, and 58% were male; 57% of infants in both groups had been exposed to steroids before birth. The median duration of mechanical ventilation was reduced from 6.2 days in the eligible NR group to 4. 8 days in the placebo group (P =.008). There was also a trend toward less frequent and less severe intraventricular hemorrhage in trial participants. CONCLUSIONS: These data are consistent with the hypothesis that sick newborn infants may benefit from participation in a randomized controlled trial.

A placebo-controlled randomized trial of antithrombin therapy in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is associated with decreased plasma activity of antithrombin (AT) and increased formation of thrombin. We tested whether AT reduces thrombin formation, improves gas exchange, and decreases the duration of mechanical ventilation and supplemental oxygen. One hundred twenty-two infants were randomized to pasteurized AT concentrate or to placebo. Two ml/kg (equivalent to 100 IU AT/kg) were followed by 1 ml/kg (50 IU/kg) every 6 h for 48 h. Outcome measures included plasma AT activity, thrombin-AT (TAT) complex, prothrombin fragment (F1+2), the ratio of arterial to alveolar oxygen pressure [(a/A)PO2], and the ventilator efficiency index (VEI). In the AT group (n = 61), mean (SD) birth weight was 1,198 (301) g, mean (SD) gestational age (GA) was 28.3 (2.0) wk, 54% were male. In the placebo group (n = 61), mean (SD) birth weight was 1,201 (315) g, mean (SD) GA was 28.8 (2. 3) wk, 51% were male. In treated infants, AT activity was raised to means of 1.69 and 2.25 U/ml at 24 and 48 h, respectively. Corresponding means in control infants were 0.37 and 0.44 U/ml (p < 0.0001). F1+2, but not TAT, was significantly reduced by AT (p = 0. 004). VEI and (a/A)PO2 were similar in both groups throughout the first week of life. Median days receiving mechanical ventilation were 7.1 (AT) versus 4.8 (placebo), p = 0.0014. Median days receiving supplemental oxygen were 7.9 (AT) versus 5.5 (placebo), p < 0.0001. There were seven (11.5%) deaths in the AT group and three (4.9%) deaths in the placebo group. We conclude that treatment with AT cannot be recommended in premature infants with RDS.

Does vitamin C cause hemolysis in premature newborn infants? Results of a multicenter double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that vitamin C supplementation of premature neonates is associated with hemolysis. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of vitamin C supplementation (50 mg/day) was undertaken in premature neonates (birth weight, 1000 to 1500 gm). Infants were randomly assigned to receive vitamin C (Ce-Vi-Sol) (n = 32) or placebo (n = 24) for 14 days. Twenty-three subjects per group were required to detect a difference of 1 SD in corrected carboxyhemoglobin values (alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.10). RESULTS: Day 14 vitamin C levels were lower in control subjects than in supplemented neonates (62 +/- 24 vs 125 +/- 62 micromol/L, p = 0.005). There was no difference in corrected blood carboxyhemoglogin concentrations (0.72 +/- 0.44 vs 0.72 +/- 0.23%; p = 0.95), other parameters of hemolysis, weight gain, blood sampled, presumed septic episodes, necrotizing enterocolitis, feeding intolerance, or transfusion. On day 14, bilirubin values were higher in control subjects than in the supplemented group (77 +/- 37 vs 55 +/- 33 micromol/L; p = 0.04). When a distant outlier in the nonsupplemented group was excluded (163 micromol/L), statistical significance was lost (73 +/- 32 vs 55 +/- 33 micromol/L; p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Oral supplementation of premature infants with vitamin C is not associated with evidence of increased erythrocyte destruction, hyperbilirubinemia, or other morbidity.

Determinants of parental authorization for involvement of newborn infants in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: Parents have the right to decide on behalf of their infants whether to enroll them in controlled clinical trials. We determined the degree to which such parental decisions are influenced by risk and benefit considerations compared with other factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Parents who had recently given or declined consent to one of three controlled trials in the neonatal intensive care unit. INTERVENTION: Parents were asked to complete a questionnaire that consisted of 15 sociodemographic items and 13 scaled responses to statements assessing the probability and magnitude of risk and benefit as well as perceived illness severity, attitudes toward research, and the consent process. ANALYSIS: Responses were subjected to factor analysis to identify underlying constructs. The sample was then randomly split, and multiple regression was performed on each half. RESULTS: The response rate was 83% (103 of 124) for those who had consented and 86% (37 of 43) for those who had declined. Factor analysis yielded three factors: (1) illness severity, (2) perceptions of risk or benefit and attitudes to research, and (3) sociodemographic characteristics. Multiple linear regression showed a significant multiple correlation of consent decision (r = .502), but only the second factor contributed. The analyses on split halves of the sample were comparable. Thirty-two percent of all parents agreed with the statement, "I would prefer to have the doctors advise me whether my baby should be in the study, rather than asking me to decide." CONCLUSIONS: In making consent decisions on behalf of their newborn infants, parents are influenced by risk and benefit assessments, attitudes toward research, and the integrity of the consent process. Illness severity or sociodemographic characteristics do not seem to be of similar importance. Rather than making the decision alone, a significant minority of parents would prefer to have the physicians advise them whether to volunteer their infants for a clinical trial.