No meaningful drug interactions with doravirine, lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate coadministration.

BACKGROUND: Doravirine (DOR) is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor available as a single tablet and a three-drug combination with lamivudine (3TC) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) to treat HIV-1 infection. These analyses assessed pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions with coadministration. METHODS: Two trials were conducted. Study 1: two-period, fixed-sequence; eight healthy participants; Period 1, DOR 100 mg followed by ≥7-day washout; Period 2, TDF 300 mg once daily for 18 days, coadministration of DOR 100 mg on day 14. Study 2: three-period, crossover, 15 healthy participants; Treatment A, DOR 100 mg; Treatment B, 3TC 300 mg + TDF 300 mg; Treatment C, DOR 100 mg + 3TC 300 mg + TDF 300 mg; ≥7-day washout between periods. RESULTS: Study 1: geometric mean ratios (GMRs; 90% confidence interval [CI]) of DOR area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) and observed plasma concentrations at 24 h post-dose (C24 h; DOR+TDF/DOR) were 0.95 (0.80, 1.12) and 0.94 (0.78, 1.12), respectively. Study 2: GMRs (90% CI) of DOR AUC0-∞ and C24 h (DOR+3TC+TDF/DOR) were 0.96 (0.87, 1.06) and 0.94 (0.83, 1.06), respectively. GMRs (90% CI) of 3TC and tenofovir AUC0-∞ (DOR+3TC+TDF/3TC+TDF) were 0.94 (0.88, 1.00) and 1.11 (0.97, 1.28), respectively. Study drugs were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple doses of TDF did not have a clinically meaningful effect on DOR PK. The PK of DOR were similar when administered alone or in combination with 3TC and TDF. DOR had no meaningful effect on the PK of 3TC and tenofovir.

A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the single-dose pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of sitagliptin in pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of sitagliptin in pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind evaluation of sitagliptin in 35 patients 10 to 17 years old with T2DM at 7 clinical research sites. The safety, tolerability, PK, and PD (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 [DPP-4] inhibition and aspects of glucose metabolism) of single doses of 50, 100, and 200 mg were assessed. Appropriate transformations on the PK parameters were used and back-transformed summary statistics are reported. RESULTS: Adverse experiences were reported by eight study participants; all were of mild intensity except one (intravenous site pain of moderate intensity). PK characteristics in the young patients were comparable to reference adult data, with geometric mean ratios (youths/adults) for AUC0-∞ , Cmax , and C24hr of 0.82, 1.04, and 0.74, respectively. Single doses of 50, 100, and 200 mg sitagliptin inhibited 67.2%, 73.8%, and 81.2% of plasma DPP-4 activity over 24 hours, respectively. Least squares (LS) mean glucose concentrations 2 hours after an oral glucose tolerance test or a meal tolerance test decreased in study participants treated with sitagliptin, compared to placebo, while active LS mean glucagon-like peptide 1 concentrations increased significantly at all sitagliptin doses in both tests. CONCLUSIONS: Single doses of sitagliptin as high as 200 mg were generally well tolerated in 10- to 17-year-old male and female study participants with T2DM, and a daily sitagliptin dose of 100 mg is appropriate for evaluation in Phase III safety and efficacy studies in pediatric patients with T2DM. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00730275).

No Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Elbasvir or Grazoprevir and Buprenorphine/Naloxone in Healthy Participants and Participants Receiving Stable Opioid Agonist Therapy.

The aims of these phase I trials were to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction between elbasvir (EBR) or grazoprevir (GZR) and buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NAL). Trial 1 was a single-dose trial in healthy participants. Trial 2 was a multiple-dose trial in participants on BUP/NAL maintenance therapy. Coadministration of EBR or GZR with BUP/NAL had minimal effect on the pharmacokinetics of BUP/NAL, EBR, and GZR. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs (90% CI)) for BUP, norbuprenorphine, and NAL AUC0-∞ were 0.98 (0.89-1.08), 0.97 (0.86-1.09), and 0.88 (0.78-1.00) in the presence/absence of EBR; 0.98 (0.81-1.19), 1.13 (0.97-1.32), and 1.10 (0.82-1.47) in the presence/absence of GZR. The GMRs (90% CI) for EBR and GZR AUC0-∞ in the absence/presence of BUP/NAL were 1.22 (0.98-1.52) and 0.86 (0.63-1.18). In conclusion, no dose adjustment for BUP/NAL, EBR, or GZR is required for patients with HCV infection receiving EBR/GZR and BUP/NAL maintenance therapy.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, short-term monotherapy study of doravirine in treatment-naive HIV-infected individuals.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the antiviral activity, pharmacokinetics, and safety of doravirine in nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-naïve, HIV-infected men. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, two-panel, dose-escalation study. METHODS: In two sequential panels, 18 individuals received doravirine [25 mg (Panel A) or 200 mg (Panel B)] or matching placebo once daily for 7 days. Plasma samples were collected daily for measurement of HIV-1 RNA levels and doravirine pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: For the mean change from baseline in HIV RNA (log10 copies/ml) at 24 h after the day 7 dose, the mean difference (90% confidence interval) between doravirine and placebo was -1.37 (-1.60, -1.14) in the 25-mg group and -1.26 (-1.51, -1.02) in the 200-mg group. None of the participants had viral breakthrough. Increases in mean AUC0-24 h, Cmax, and C24 h were slightly less than dose-proportional, with median Tmax of 1.0-2.0 h. Steady state was achieved after 3-5 days of once-daily dosing. At steady state, accumulation ratios (day 7/day 1) for AUC0-24 h, Cmax, and C24 h were 1.2-1.6. The calculated effective t1/2 (10-16 h) was similar to that in HIV-uninfected individuals. Adverse events were limited in number, transient, and generally mild to moderate in intensity. One participant had a serious adverse event of elevated liver enzymes (judged probably not drug related) in concurrence with a newly acquired hepatitis C infection. CONCLUSION: Doravirine monotherapy demonstrated robust antiviral activity at both dose levels, without evidence of viral resistance, and was generally well tolerated. Doravirine pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected individuals were similar to those in uninfected individuals receiving similar doses in prior studies.

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of doravirine, a novel HIV non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, after single and multiple doses in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Doravirine is a novel non-nucleoside inhibitor of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase with potent activity against wild-type virus (95% inhibitory concentration 19 nM, 50% human serum). Doravirine has low potential to cause drug-drug interactions since it is primarily eliminated by oxidative metabolism and does not inhibit or significantly induce drug-metabolizing enzymes. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics and safety of doravirine were investigated in two double-blind, dose-escalation studies in healthy males. Thirty-two subjects received single doses of doravirine (6-1,200 mg) or matching placebo tablets; 40 subjects received doravirine (30-750 mg) or matching placebo tablets once daily for 10 days. In addition, the effect of doravirine (120 mg for 14 days) on single-dose pharmacokinetics of the CYP3A substrate midazolam was evaluated (10 subjects). RESULTS: The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of doravirine was achieved within 1-5 h with an apparent terminal half-life of 12-21 h. Consistent with single-dose pharmacokinetics, steady state was achieved after approximately 7 days of once daily administration, with accumulation ratios (day 10/day 1) of 1.1-1.5 in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve during the dosing interval (AUC0-24 h), Cmax and trough plasma concentration (C24 h). All dose levels produced C24 h>19 nM. Administration of 50 mg doravirine with a high-fat meal was associated with slight elevations in AUC time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) and C24 h with no change in Cmax. Midazolam AUC0-∞ was slightly reduced by coadministration of doravirine (geometric mean ratio 0.82, 90% CI 0.70, 0.97). There was no apparent relationship between adverse event frequency or intensity and doravirine dose. No rash or significant central nervous system events other than headache were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Doravirine is generally well tolerated in single doses up to 1,200 mg and multiple doses up to 750 mg once daily for up to 10 days, with a pharmacokinetic profile supportive of once-daily dosing. Doravirine at steady state slightly reduced the exposure of coadministered midazolam, to a clinically unimportant extent.

Context-dependent neuronal differentiation and germ layer induction of Smad4-/- and Cripto-/- embryonic stem cells.

Activation of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) receptors typically elicits mesodermal development, whereas inhibition of this pathway induces neural fates. In vitro differentiated mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells with deletion of the TGF-beta pathway-related factors Smad4 or Cripto exhibited increased numbers of neurons. Cripto-/- ES cells developed into neuroecto-/epidermal cell types, while Smad4-/- cells also displayed mesodermal differentiation. ES cell differentiation into catecholaminergic neurons showed that these ES cells retained their ability to develop into dopaminergic and serotonergic neurons with typical expression patterns of midbrain and hindbrain genes. In vivo, transplanted ES cells to the mouse striatum became small neuronal grafts, or large grafts with cell types from all germ layers independent of their ES cell genotype. This demonstrates that Smad4-/- and Cripto-/- ES cells favor a neural fate in vitro, but also express the mesodermal phenotype, implying that deletion of either Smad4 or Cripto is not sufficient to block nonneuronal tissue formation.