Costs associated with potentially unnecessary postoperative healthcare encounters after lumbar spine surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Excessive use of postoperative imaging after lumbar surgery has been documented, becoming a target for cutting costs. This must be balanced with the patient's need for information and allay their postoperative concerns. PURPOSE: To determine the incidence and associated costs of patient interactions with the healthcare system, outside the standard follow up routine, in the first postoperative year. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive series of 200 patients who underwent lumbar fusions from 2018 to 2019 from a multi-surgeon single tertiary spine center. OUTCOME MEASURES: All healthcare encounters: phone calls, office and emergency department visits, and additional testing METHODS: A consecutive series of 200 patients who underwent lumbar fusions from 2018 to 2019 were identified. All non-routine healthcare encounters: phone calls, office and emergency department visits, and additional testing were collected. Direct costs for all healthcare services were determined using the Medicare Allowable rates. Indirect costs were determined using local, median income, length of office visits, and distance from the clinic to the patient's home. RESULTS: Of 200 patients, 14 with thoracic fusion were excluded. The mean age of the 186 included patients was 58.26 years and 85 (46%) were male. Forty-seven percent (87/186) had only routine postoperative visits and 24 had revision surgery. Seventy-five patients made a total of 102 phone calls, 55 office visits, leading to 38 diagnostic studies none of which led to an additional intervention. Using Medicare Allowable rates, the mean direct cost was $776 per patient and the using a median income of $16/h the mean indirect cost was $124 per patient. There were no differences in the baseline characteristics among the patients who only had routine post-op encounters, had non-routine encounters or had a repeat surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Forty percent of the patients undergoing lumbar surgery had a healthcare encounter outside their routine follow up that did not result in additional intervention after their index operation. These potentially unnecessary encounters create additional cost and inconvenience to both the patient and healthcare system. Providing patient reassurance is important and providers should identify ways to reduce associated costs through patient education, virtual visits, or new technologies to monitor patient's postoperative progress.

A novel intramedullary nail to control interfragmentary motion in diaphyseal tibial fractures.

Numerous animal and human studies have demonstrated the benefit of controlled interfragmentary motion on fracture healing. In this study, we quantified interfragmentary motion and load transfer in tibial fractures fixed using a novel intramedullary nail (IMN) that allows controlled axial motion. Fifty composite tibias with various fracture patterns were utilized. For all test conditions, two interlocking screws were used to fix the nail in the proximal metaphysis, and two interlocking screws through the distal metaphysis. The nail allowed either no motion (static mode) or 1 mm (dynamic mode) of cyclic axial motion between the two fracture fragments for every fracture pattern tested. As expected, strain shielding was more prominent under static nail conditions. In contrast, specimens tested under dynamic nail conditions transferred axial load between the fracture fragments such that strains near the fracture site were generally similar to those measured on an intact tibia. Maximum shear strains proximal to the fracture were significantly lower in specimens with oblique or butterfly fracture patterns (p < 0.01) compared to intact specimens. This decrease in shear strain indicates that strain shielding effects were likely present due to the implant. However, strain shielding appeared to be reduced in tensile and compressive principal strains. In summary, the novel IMN allowed controlled axial motion between the fragments in a variety of common diaphyseal tibial fracture patterns. Clinical Significance: The present in vitro biomechanical study investigated a novel intramedullary nail capable of controlled axial interfragmentary motion which may potentially enhance fracture healing.

Is load control necessary to produce physiological AP displacement and axial rotation in wear testing of TAR?

The International Standard Organization, ISO 22622, specifies two options for joint wear simulator evaluation of total ankle replacements (TARs): load-controlled and displacement-controlled. In the present study, the load-controlled testing parameters were applied to cadaveric specimens to quantify and compare the observed sagittal translations and axial rotations to those specified under the displacement-controlled option. Twelve cadaveric specimens were stripped of extraneous tissues, keeping surrounding ankle ligaments. A halo was used to produce plantarflexion and dorsiflexion of the talus through two screws, while a baseplate resisted axial loads. The axial force and torque were applied to the tibia and fibula under force and torque feedback control. An anterior-posterior force was applied to the tibia. Plantarflexion-dorsiflexion were applied using rotation control. To protect the cadaveric specimens, loads were applied at 50% of the specified load profile while plantarflexion-dorsiflexion rotation was applied as specified. There was variation among specimens in magnitudes of anterior-posterior displacement with peaks ranging from 3.3 mm posteriorly to 3.0 mm anteriorly. Likewise, there was variation among specimens in magnitude of axial rotation, with peaks ranging from 11° external rotation to 4.5° internal rotation. However, the mean magnitudes of AP displacement and axial rotation did not exceed those specified by ISO 22622.