[Personality dimensions and neuropsychological performance in first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia and by affective psychosis]. / Inventaire de personnalité de Eysenck et performances neuropsychologiques chez les apparentés de patients atteints de schizophrénie et de psychose affective.

Several studies have found a significant increase in the prevalence of some personality disorders in the first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia; other studies have found subtle neuropsychological deficits in these relatives. However, little is known about the specificity of the personality traits reported or about the relationship between these traits and the neuropsychological deficits. One hundred first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia (AS) and 88 first-degree relatives of affective psychotic (APA) patients completed the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire which measures extraversion, neuroticism, psychoticism. They were also administered the National Adult Reading Test (NART), the Trail Making Test (TMT) and a Verbal Fluency Test (VFT). In the AS group, the male relatives scored significantly higher on the psychoticism scale than the male relatives in the APA group. There were no significant differences in personality between female relatives of the 2 patients groups. In the AS group, the NART scores were superior when the psychoticism scores were lower and the TMT performance was better when the extraversion scores were higher. These results seem to indicate some specificity as well as sex differences of the psychoticism dimension. Moreover, the relationship between the personality dimensions and the neuropsychological performance could indicate that psychoticism increases vulnerability to schizophrenia whereas extraversion decreases it.

Neuropsychological performance of psychotic patients in community care: results from the UK700 study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare cognitive performance in chronic schizophrenic and affective psychotic patients maintained in community care. METHOD: We studied a sample of community-based patients (n = 707) with chronic psychotic disorders. Neuropsychological assessment was completed using the National Adult Reading Test (NART) and the Trail Making Test (TMT). RESULTS: Affective psychotic patients had higher premorbid IQ than schizophrenic patients before adjustment for confounding factors (P=0.03); however, after adjustment for ethnic group and social class this became non-significant (P=0.19). There were no significant differences between groups on the TMT, parts A or B. CONCLUSION: Unlike studies suggesting that schizophrenic patients are more cognitively impaired than affective psychotic patients, our study suggests a degree of cognitive homogeneity between those patients who develop a chronic illness. Measures of premorbid IQ suggest that this cognitive homogeneity exists prior to the onset of illness.

Reducing violence in severe mental illness: randomised controlled trial of intensive case management compared with standard care.

OBJECTIVES: To establish whether intensive case management reduces violence in patients with psychosis in comparison with standard case management. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with two year follow up. SETTING: Four inner city community mental health services. PARTICIPANTS: 708 patients with established psychotic illness allocated at random to intervention (353) or control (355) group. INTERVENTION: Intensive case management (caseload 10-15 per case manager) for two years compared with standard case management (30-35 per case manager). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Physical assault over two years measured by interviews with patients and case managers and examination of case notes. RESULTS: No significant reduction in violence was found in the intensive case management group compared with the control group (22.7% v 21.9%, P=0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive case management does not reduce the prevalence of violence in psychotic patients in comparison with standard care.

Verbal fluency in patients with schizophrenia and affective psychoses and their first-degree relatives.

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenic patients are known to have neuropsychological deficits including impaired verbal fluency, but it is not clear whether this latter deficit is: (a) a consequence of overall intellectual deficit; (b) shared with affective psychotic patients; or (c) shared by the relatives of schizophrenic patients; and (d) shared by the relatives of affective psychotic patients. METHODS: We administered Thurstone's Verbal Fluency Test to 45 schizophrenic patients and 72 of their relatives, and 30 affective psychotic patients and 53 of their relatives. Subjects were asked to generate as many words as possible beginning with the letters 'C' and 'S' and the total was taken as the dependent variable. Subjects also completed the National Adult Reading Test (NART) to provide a measure of (pre-morbid) IQ. RESULTS: Schizophrenic patients generated significantly fewer words than affective psychotic patients, however adjusting for NART this became non-significant. Schizophrenic (but not affective psychotic) patients generated significantly fewer words than their relatives; again adjusting for NART this became non-significant. Patients who had been exposed to obstetric complications (OC+) and those who had not (OC-) had similarly poor verbal fluency scores. Relatives of OC+ schizophrenic patients had superior verbal fluency than relatives of OC- schizophrenic patients and this remained significant after adjustment for NART. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that some families transmit impairment in verbal fluency as part of a pattern of lower overall IQ. However, in other families, relatives show largely normal neuropsychological function, and the poorer verbal performance of the schizophrenic member appears to have arisen secondary to his/her exposure to OCs.

Neuropsychological performance and spectrum personality traits in the relatives of patients with schizophrenia and affective psychosis.

Neuropsychological deficits are found in both schizophrenic patients and their relatives, and some studies have shown similar, but less severe, deficits in affective psychotic patients and their relatives. We set out to establish: (a) whether schizophrenia spectrum personality traits are more common in the relatives of schizophrenic patients than, in the relatives of affective psychotic patients; and (b) what the relation is between spectrum personality traits and neuropsychological deficits in these relatives. Relatives were interviewed using the International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE), and also completed the National Adult Reading Test (NART), the Trail Making Test (TMT; Parts A and B) and Thurstone's Verbal Fluency Test (TVFT). Spectrum personality traits were equally common in 129 relatives of schizophrenic patients and 106 relatives of affective psychotic patients, but the performance of the former group was inferior to that of the latter on the NART and the TVFT. Relatives with high paranoid traits had lower NART scores than relatives without such personality traits; similarly, those with high schizoid traits took longer to complete the TMT, part B, than those without such traits; and relatives with high schizotypal traits generated significantly fewer words on the TVFT than those without such traits. We conclude that relatives of schizophrenic and affective psychotic patients share a propensity to schizophrenia spectrum traits, but relatives of the former have poorer neuropsychological performance. Furthermore, there exists an association between neuropsychological deficits and spectrum traits in both groups of relatives; in particular those with high paranoid traits have lower IQ scores than their less paranoid counterparts.

Does socioeconomic status predict course and outcome in patients with psychosis?

BACKGROUND: We examined the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and course and outcome of patients with psychosis. Two hypotheses were examined: a) patients with higher best-ever SES will have better course and outcome than those with lower best-ever SES, and b) patients with greater downward drift in SES will have poorer course and outcome than those with less downward drift. METHOD: Data were drawn from the baseline and 2-year follow-up assessments of the UK700 Case Management Trial of 708 patients with severe psychosis. The indicators of SES used were occupational status and educational achievement. Drift in SES was defined as change from best-ever occupation to occupation at baseline. RESULTS: For the baseline data highly significant differences were found between best-ever groups and negative symptoms (non-manual vs. unemployed--coef -10.5, p=0.000, 95% CIs 5.1-15.8), functioning (non-manual vs. unemployed--coef -0.6, p=0.000, 95% CIs 0.3 to -0.8) and unmet needs (manual vs. unemployed - coef 0.5, p=0.004, 95% CIs 0.2-0.9). No significant differences between best-ever groups were found for days in hospital, symptoms, perceived quality of life and dissatisfaction with services. Significant differences for clinical and social variables were found between drift and non-drift SES groups. There were no significant findings between educational groups and clinical and social variables. CONCLUSIONS: Best-ever occupation, but not educational qualifications, appeared to predict prognosis in patients with severe psychosis. Downward drift in occupational status did not result in poorer illness course and outcome.

Diagnostic value of the DSM and ICD categories of psychosis: an evidence-based approach. UK700 Group.

BACKGROUND: It is generally assumed that the distinction between affective and non-affective psychosis occasioned by modern diagnostic criteria provides a useful symptomatic contrast. METHOD: In a sample of 708 patients with chronic psychosis, the distinction of lifetime DSM-III-R and ICD-10 diagnoses of affective versus non-affective psychosis was used as a diagnostic test to detect lifetime presence of depressive, manic, positive, negative and disorganisation symptoms. RESULTS: A manic or depressive affective diagnosis was a perfect test to diagnose the presence of manic and depressive symptoms, as evidenced by very high diagnostic likelihood ratios. However, this test result was based solely on the inclusion criterion that patients with affective psychosis must have affective symptoms (guaranteeing high specificity and high likelihood ratios), and ignored the fact that patients with non-affective psychosis also had high affective symptom scores (low sensitivity). Furthermore, a non-affective psychotic diagnosis was a very poor test to diagnose correctly the presence of positive, negative and disorganisation symptoms in comparison with an affective psychotic diagnosis. In general, the DSM-III-R categories performed somewhat better as a diagnostic test than those of ICD-10. CONCLUSION: The evidence for true diagnostic value of the distinction between affective and non-affective psychotic diagnoses is weak. Rather, the distinction appears to obscure natural overlap between the symptom dimensions of the different diagnostic categories.

Childhood schizotypy and positive symptoms in schizophrenic patients predict schizotypy in relatives.

BACKGROUND: Schizotypy is one phenotypic expression of the familial-genetic liability to schizophrenia, but its precise relationship to frank psychotic symptoms remains unclear. We, therefore, set out to examine the relationships between (a) premorbid personality in schizophrenic patients, (b) the psychopathology they showed, and (c) schizotypal traits in their relatives. METHOD: Ninety consecutively admitted schizophrenic patients were interviewed with the Present State Examination (PSE). Their mothers were interviewed concerning their childhood personality and social adjustment, and 121 of their well relatives were evaluated with three different schizotypal scales. Factor analyses were carried out on (a) the nine main psychotic symptoms from the patients' PSE interview, and on (b) the schizotypal features derived from the scales completed by the first-degree relatives. Correlation coefficients were calculated between premorbid personality traits, and factor scores in probands and in relatives. RESULTS: No relationship was found between childhood schizoid-schizotypal personality traits and any particular dimension of psychopathology in patients. The positive syndrome in patients was correlated with higher scores for relatives on the three schizotypy scales, but did not predict any specific pattern of schizotypy in the relatives. Premorbid schizoid-schizotypal traits were also correlated with schizotypy in the relatives. CONCLUSIONS: Schizotypy in relatives has a familial relationship with schizoid-schizotypal traits in the childhood, and with positive symptoms during the illness, of schizophrenic patients.

Premorbid IQ in patients with functional psychosis and their first-degree relatives.

Numerous studies have found deficits in premorbid IQ in schizophrenic patients, but it is not clear whether this deficit is shared by (a) patients with other functional psychoses, and (b) relatives of these patients. Ninety-one schizophrenic patients, 66 affective psychotic patients (29 schizoaffective and 37 manic or depressed), and 50 normal control subjects were administered the National Adult Reading Test (NART) which provides an estimate of premorbid IQ. The NART was also completed by 85 first-degree relatives of schizophrenic patients and by 65 first-degree relatives of affective psychotic patients. After adjustments were made for sex, social class, ethnicity and years of education, schizophrenic patients had significantly lower premorbid IQ than their relatives, the affective psychotic patients and controls. Manic and depressed patients had significantly lower NART scores than their first-degree relatives, but schizoaffective patients did not, and neither group differed significantly from controls. There was no significant difference in premorbid IQ between patients who had experienced obstetric complications (OC+) and those who had not (OC-). Both OC+ and OC- schizophrenic patients differed significantly from their relatives, but the disparity was greatest between OC+ patients and their relatives. Relatives of OC+ schizophrenic patients had significantly higher IQ than relatives of OC- schizophrenic patients.

Are schizophrenics neuropsychologically impaired affected psychotics? Neuropsychological performance and personality traits in relatives.

Neuropsychological deficits are found in both schizophrenic patients and their relatives, and some studies have shown similar, but less severe, deficits in affective psychotic patients and their relatives. We set out to establish - whether schizophrenia spectrum personality traits are more common in the relatives of schizophrenic patients than relatives of affective psychotic patients; - what is the relationship between spectrum personality traits and neuropsychological deficits in these relatives. Relatives were interviewed using the International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE), and also completed the National Adult Reading Test (NART), the Trail Making Test (TMT: Parts A and B) and Thurstone's Verbal Fluency Test (TVFT). Spectrum personality traits were equally common in the 129 relatives of schizophrenic and 106 relatives of affective psychotic patients. Relatives of psychotic patients who themselves had high paranoid traits had lower NART scores than those without such personality traits (p=0.007);similarly, those with high schizoid personality traits took longer to complete the TMT, part B than those without such traits (p=0.0l); and relatives with high schizotypal traits generated significantly fewer words on the verbal fluency test than those without such traits (p=0.04).

To what extent does symptomatic improvement result in better outcome in psychotic illness? UK700 Group.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of therapeutic interventions in psychosis is increasingly reported in terms of reductions in different symptom dimensions. It remains unclear, however, to what degree such symptomatic changes are accompanied by improvement in other measures such as service use, quality of life, and needs for care. METHODS: A sample of 708 patients with chronic psychotic illness was assessed on three occasions over 2 years (baseline, year 1 and year 2). A multilevel analysis was conducted to examine to what degree reduction in psychopathological scores derived from factor analysis of the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS), was associated with improvement in service use, disability, subjective outcomes and measures of self-harm. RESULTS: Reduction in positive, negative, depressive and manic symptoms over the study period were all independently associated with lessening of social disability. Reduction in negative symptoms, and to a lesser extent in positive and manic symptoms, was associated with less time in hospital and more time living independently, whereas changes in positive and manic symptoms resulted in fewer admissions. Subjective outcomes such as improvement in quality of life, perceived needs for care and dissatisfaction with services showed the strongest associations with reduction in depressive symptoms. Reduction in positive symptoms was associated with decreased likelihood of parasuicide. Results did not differ according to diagnostic category. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that changes in distinct psychopathological dimensions independently and differentially influence outcome. Therapeutic interventions aimed at reducing symptoms of more than one dimension are likely to have more widespread effects.

Schizophrenic patients and their first-degree relatives show an excess of mixed-handedness.

An excess of mixed-handedness in schizophrenia has been reported. However, it is not established whether this excess is manifest in non-schizophrenic psychoses, nor whether the underlying etiology is genetic or environmental. We investigated these issues in a group of patients with schizophrenia (n=94), affective psychosis (n=63), other psychosis (n=26); their respective first-degree relatives (total n=183) and a control group (n=85). A narrow definition of mixed-handedness was used corresponding to groups 5 and 6 as defined by the Annett Handedness Questionnaire. We found an excess of mixed-handedness in the schizophrenic group compared with controls (OR=5.2, 1.4-18.6, p<0.006). There was no difference between the other psychotic groups and controls. There was a trend for an excess of mixed-handedness in the first-degree relatives (n=99) of schizophrenic patients (p=0.055), but not in the relatives of affective or other psychotic patients. There was a striking linear trend in the proportion of mixed-handedness between controls, the relatives and the schizophrenic patients (chi2=7.0, p=0.008). There was no association between mixed-handedness and a history of pregnancy or birth complications in the schizophrenic group. There was some evidence for impaired sociability in the mixed-handed schizophrenic patients. Our results indicate that the excess of mixed-handedness in schizophrenia may have a genetic basis.

A comparison of the utility of dimensional and categorical representations of psychosis. UK700 Group.

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of any diagnostic scheme is directly related to its ability to provide clinically useful information on need for care. In this study, the clinical usefulness of dimensional and categorical representations of psychotic psychopathology were compared. METHOD: A total of 706 patients aged 16-65 years with chronic psychosis were recruited. Psychopathology was measured with the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). Lifetime RDC, DSM-III-R, and ICD-10 diagnoses and ratings of lifetime psychopathology were made using OPCRIT. Other clinical measures included: (i) need for care; (ii) quality of life; (iii) social disability; (iv) satisfaction with services; (v) abnormal movements; (vi) brief neuropsychological screen; and (vii) over the last 2 years--illness course, symptom severity, employment, medication use, self-harm, time in hospital and living independently. RESULTS: Principal component factor analysis of the 65 CPRS items on cross-sectional psychopathology yielded four dimensions of positive, negative, depressive and manic symptoms. Regression models comparing the relative contributions of dimensional and categorical representations of psychopathology with clinical measures consistently indicated strong and significant effects of psychopathological dimensions over and above any effect of their categorical counterparts, whereas the reverse did not hold. The effect of psychopathological dimensions was mostly cumulative: high ratings on more than one dimension increased the contribution to the clinical measures in a dose-response fashion. Similar results were obtained with psychopathological dimensions derived from lifetime psychopathology ratings using the OCCPI. CONCLUSIONS: A dimensional approach towards classification of psychotic illness offers important clinical advantages.

Prevalence and characteristics of patients with severe mental illness and borderline intellectual functioning. Report from the UK700 randomised controlled trial of case management.

BACKGROUND: Low cognitive ability and developmental delays have been implicated in the causation of mental illness. AIMS: To examine the prevalence, socio-demographic characteristics, psychopathology and social functioning profiles of people with low intelligence and recurrent psychotic illness. METHOD: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of case management provided the opportunity to explore associations between mental illness and borderline intellectual functioning (assessed using the National Adult Reading test). RESULTS: Overall prevalence of borderline intelligence was 18%. Significant positive associations were shown with: being Black Caribbean; having a father who worked in a manual occupation; lower educational achievement; having had special education; longer course of illness. Those with borderline intelligence had greater disability and were more likely to suffer extrapyramidal side-effects and show evidence of negative symptoms. Educational achievement, history of special education and social class were the best socio-demographic predictors of intellectual level. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients who attend generic psychiatric services have considerable intellectual deficits. This may lead to difficulties in other domains of adaptive functioning, and merits further investigation as well as clinical vigilance.

Life events, ethnicity and perceptions of discrimination in patients with severe mental illness.

BACKGROUND: Whilst it is commonly believed that black and ethnic minority (B&EM) people living in the UK experience social disadvantage compared with the white British (WB) population, no study has specifically addressed this issue in patients with severe mental illness. We sought to test the hypothesis that B&EM patients experience more negative life events than their WB counterparts, and to examine the extent to which they attribute these events to discrimination. METHOD: Thirty-four WB, 78 African Caribbean (AC) and 35 other ethnic minority patients with psychotic illnesses, defined using Research Diagnostic Criteria, were asked to complete a Racial Life Event Questionnaire examining life events and perceptions of discrimination at baseline and 12 and 24 months later. RESULTS: African Caribbean patients experienced more 'Financial' life events across the study period, otherwise there were no significant differences between patient groups in number of life events experienced. The B&EM group collectively (n = 113), however, were significantly more likely than the WB group (n = 34) to attribute 'Assault', and 'Legal' life events to discrimination. The AC patient group were significantly more likely than the other two ethnic groups to attribute the 'Financial' and 'Health' life events they experienced to discrimination. The B&EM group was also significantly more likely, and particularly the AC patient group, to report that members of their own ethnic group are adversely affected by discrimination. Further analyses showed skin colour rather than ethnicity or nationality to be the major contributing factor to perception of discrimination; thus, the Irish (n = 11) had similar scores to the WB while Africans (n = 16) scored like the ACs. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that B&EM patients do not experience significantly more life events than WB patients; however, their perception of these events is clearly different, and significantly more often attributed to racism. It is reasonable to suppose that patients may be disinclined to utilise services they believe to be prejudiced against them on the basis of their skin colour, and service providers need to be aware of this in order to create health care services that B&EM patients feel confident to use.

Obstetric complications and familial morbid risk of psychiatric disorders.

Obstetric complications (OCs) have been found to occur in higher frequency in patients with schizophrenia. One explanation for this finding is that the genes that contribute to the schizophrenia phenotype also influence the likelihood to experience OCs. If this were true, morbid risk of psychiatric illness should be higher in the first-degree relatives of both schizophrenic and control probands exposed to OCs, compared to probands not exposed to OCs. We set out to test this hypothesis. Information on OCs, blind to family history of psychiatric disorder, was collected retrospectively through maternal interview in 151 psychotic patients and 100 controls. Family history (FH) in relatives of cases (n = 600) and controls (n = 461) was assessed with the FH-RDC and through personal interviews. Tests for associations between family history and OCs were conducted using Cox proportional hazard regression. In the cases, familial morbid risk of affective disorder was greater in those with a history of OCs (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.9, P = 0.007). Analyses examining individual complications revealed associations between FH of affective disorder and pre-eclampsia (HR = 2.9, P = 0.003) and FH of affective disorder and breech presentation (HR = 2.8, P = 0.02), especially when family history in the relatives was confined to affective illness in the mother (HR pre-eclampsia = 4.4, P = 0.009; HR breech-presentation = 4.2, P = 0.008). In controls, affective illness in the mother was not only associated with breech presentation (HR = 7.0, P = 0.01) and pre-eclampsia (HR = 4.4, P = 0.03) but also with other complications. Familial morbid risk of schizophrenia and related psychoses was not associated with OCs. The positive associations between OCs and familial morbid risk of affective disorder suggest that the factors that contribute to familial aggregation of affective symptoms in psychotic patients also influence the likelihood to experience OCs. Although the proportion of OCs that could be attributed to these factors was very small, part of the relationship between family history of affective disorder and psychosis may be mediated by OCs.

Premorbid social functioning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: similarities and differences.

OBJECTIVE: This research examined social functioning in childhood and adolescence among patients with schizophrenia and patients with bipolar disorder compared with healthy subjects and investigated the relation between premorbid adjustment and risk factors for psychosis. METHOD: Maternal recall was used to assess the premorbid adjustment of patients with schizophrenia (N = 70) and patients with bipolar disorder (N = 28) recruited from a survey of consecutive hospital admissions for psychosis and of healthy comparison subjects (N = 100) drawn from the same catchment area. RESULTS: The patients with schizophrenia had significantly poorer premorbid adjustment in childhood and adolescence than the comparison subjects and were impaired in both sociability and school adjustment. The patients with bipolar disorder exhibited poorer social impairment in adolescence than the comparison subjects, though to a lesser degree than the schizophrenic subjects, but functioned well at school. There were significant linear trends in the risk of psychosis with worsening premorbid functioning, which was most marked in the schizophrenic group, and a specific linear relation between low birth weight and poor premorbid adjustment among the schizophrenic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired premorbid social functioning is not specific to schizophrenia and is seen also in bipolar disorder. The data support the view that poor premorbid social adjustment is one manifestation of vulnerability to adult psychotic disorders. These results are consistent with other findings pointing to early developmental deficits in patients who subsequently develop psychosis.

Increased rate of psychosis among African-Caribbeans in Britain is not due to an excess of pregnancy and birth complications.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the increased rate of psychotic illness among African-Caribbeans living in Britain is due to an excess of pregnancy and birth complications (PBCs). METHOD: We therefore compared the frequency of PBCs in a group of White psychotic patients (n = 103) and a comparable group of patients of African-Caribbean origin (n = 61); the latter consisted of 30 first-generation (born in the Caribbean) and 31 second-generation (born in Britain) individuals. RESULTS: White psychotic patients were more than twice as likely to have a history of PBCs as their African-Caribbean counterparts (odds ratio = 2.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-6.47, P = 0.062). The same trend was observed among patients with a DSM-III diagnosis of schizophrenia (odds ratio = 1.65, 95% CI 0.56-4.97, P = 0.32). The rate of PBCs was similar among the first- and second-generation Caribbean psychotic patients. CONCLUSIONS: The increased rate of psychotic illness that has been reported among the African-Caribbean population in Britain is not due to an increased prevalence of PBCs.

Comparison of the family history with the family study method: report from the Camberwell Collaborative Psychosis Study.

We assessed the accuracy of the family history (FH-RDC) and family study (SADS-L) methods for obtaining information about the presence of psychopathology in 274 first-degree relatives of patients with psychotic disorders. The family history method had only modest sensitivity, 40.8% for affective disorders and 58.6% for psychotic disorders, but high specificity, 94.1% for affective disorders and 98.7% for psychotic disorders. For both disorders, sensitivity was higher for relatives who had had previous psychiatric admissions. However, with the family study method, we found that relatives with affective disorder were more likely to be interviewed than those relatives with other disorders. Hence, the family study method may be prone to selection bias that distorts morbid risk estimates. We conclude that the best way of collecting information regarding family psychopathology is to interview directly as many relatives as possible and to collect supplementary family history information on unavailable relatives.