The impact of patient-reported frailty on cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients after non-ST-acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: As life expectancy increases, the population of older individuals with coronary artery disease and frailty is growing. We aimed to assess the impact of patient-reported frailty on the treatment and prognosis of elderly early survivors of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). METHODS: Frailty data were obtained from two prospective trials, POPular Age and the POPular Age Registry, which both assessed elderly NSTE-ACS patients. Frailty was assessed one month after admission with the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) and was defined as a GFI-score of 4 or higher. In these early survivors of NSTE-ACS, we assessed differences in treatment and 1-year outcomes between frail and non-frail patients, considering major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, including cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke) and major bleeding. RESULTS: The total study population consisted of 2192 NSTE-ACS patients, aged ≥70 years. The GFI-score was available in 1320 patients (79 ± 5 years, 37% women), of whom 712 (54%) were considered frail. Frail patients were at higher risk for MACE than non-frail patients (9.7% vs. 5.1%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.43, p = 0.04), but not for major bleeding (3.7% vs. 2.8%, adjusted HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.65-2.32, p = 0.53). Cubic spline analysis showed a gradual increase of the risk for clinical outcomes with higher GFI-scores. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly NSTE-ACS patients who survived 1-month follow-up, patient-reported frailty was independently associated with a higher risk for 1-year MACE, but not with major bleeding. These findings emphasize the importance of frailty screening for risk stratification in elderly NSTE-ACS patients.

Safety considerations with the use of platelet inhibitors for elderly patients with non-ST- elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Introduction: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is standard treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This includes lifelong aspirin combined with a P2Y12 inhibitor for 1 year. The indication for one of the P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor) is dependent on the treatment strategy; whether patients undergo coronary angiography or are treated medically only. Tailoring antiplatelet therapy to the risk profile of the individual patient is of specific importance to the older patient.Areas covered: In this review, we discuss dual antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients with ACS. We present the options to tailor antiplatelet therapy based on platelet function testing, CYP2C19 genotyping and patients' thrombotic and bleeding risk. Finally, we discuss alternatives for dual antiplatelet therapy.Expert opinion: DAPT in elderly patients with ACS should consist of aspirin with clopidogrel or ticagrelor. Weighing patients' thrombotic and bleeding risk, based on clinical judgment or with use of specific risk scores, is probably the most convenient method to individualize antiplatelet therapy; however, CYP2C19 genotyping can also be used. In elderly patients with an increased bleeding risk, clopidogrel is a safe and effective alternative to ticagrelor. An alternative to 12 months DAPT could be ticagrelor monotherapy after a short period of DAPT.

Long-term follow-up after bypass surgery or coronary stenting in elderly with multivessel disease.

BACKGROUND: We sought to compare long-term follow-up of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with left main or multivessel disease, hypothesising that completeness of revascularisation and severity of coronary artery disease are predictors of adverse outcomes. METHODS: Patients aged ≥75 years with multivessel disease or left main disease who underwent PCI or CABG between 2012-2016 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Baseline characteristics from the index procedure were collected. Severity of coronary artery disease and completeness of revascularisation were assessed. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality, in addition we captured major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, bleedings, recurrent angina and new onset atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: A total of 597 patients were included. Median follow-up was 4 years (interquartile range 2.8-5.3 years). At baseline, patients in the PCI group more often had a previous medical history of CABG and more frequently underwent an urgent procedure compared with patients in the CABG group. Mortality at 5­year follow-up was significantly higher in patients who underwent PCI compared with CABG (39.9% vs 25.4%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), repeat revascularisation and recurrent angina occurred more frequently after PCI, while occurrence of bleedings and new onset atrial fibrillation were more frequent after CABG. Neither completeness of revascularisation nor severity of coronary artery disease was a predictor for any of the outcomes. CONCLUSION: Long-term mortality was higher in elderly patients with multivessel disease undergoing PCI compared with CABG. In addition, patients undergoing PCI had a higher risk of ACS, repeat revascularisation and recurrent angina.

A practical guide on how to handle patients with bleeding events while on oral antithrombotic treatment.

Bleeding is a feared complication in patients who are treated with antithrombotic therapy (oral anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy). Management of antithrombotic therapy after bleeding poses a dilemma where restarting the crucial medication could lead to recurrent bleeding, while interrupting or even discontinuing treatment could increase the thrombotic risk. In this review, we provide recommendations regarding the treatment of patients with a bleeding event while on oral antithrombotic therapy, based on the literature and expert opinion.

Management of elderly patients with a non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Elderly patients with an acute coronary syndrome are underrepresented in randomised controlled trials. Neither the European Society of Cardiology nor the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology acute coronary syndrome guidelines provide specific recommendations for elderly patients. However, elderly patients are at higher thrombotic and bleeding risk compared with younger patients leading to difficulties in choosing the optimal treatment. In this review, we discuss the uncertainties we encounter in treating elderly patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and suggest treatment options based on the existing literature.