[Soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus]. / Récepteurs solubles au tumor necrosis factor chez des malades ayant un lupus systémique.

OBJECTIVE: To study the variations of type II soluble receptors for tumor necrosis factor (sR-TNF) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and investigate their use in the clinical setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with systemic lupus were followed for a mean 3 years. sR-TNF and other immunological parameters (C reactive protein, anti-DNA antibodies, C3 and C4 complement fractions, soluble receptors for interleukin 2) were measured in sera at different points of the disease course. The systemic lupus activity measure (SLAM) was determined at each point, and confronted with the biology results. The study was cross sectional for the group and longitudinal for the patients. RESULTS: sR-TNF was the immunological parameter which correlated best with SLAM. It also correlated with sedimentation rate, C reactive protein, thrombopenia, anemia, creatinine level, anti-DNA antibodies and sR-IL2. The longitudinal study pointed out however that this finding is not consistent for each patient. CONCLUSION: A rise in sR-TNF related to systemic lupus activity but is of limited practical interest for individual patient follow-up.

[Treatment of lupus glomerulonephritis with intravenous cyclophosphamide]. / Traitement des glomérulonéphrites lupiques par le cyclophosphamide en emboles intraveineux.

The treatment of severe lupus nephritis remains problematic. We have analysed retrospectively 17 patients with corticoresistant lupus nephritis treated with pulse cyclophosphamide. Single monthly doses (500 mg/m2) were given by intravenous infusion with a mean of 10.4 infusions per patient (3 to 18). A comparison of parameters at entry and at the end of the treatment revealed an improvement in proteinuria (4.8 vs 1.9 g/24 h; p < 0.013) whereas mean serum creatinine level and SLAM (Systemic Lupus Activity Measure) remained stable. The results were identical at follow up (mean: 14.5 months). Most of the therapeutic effect was achieved as soon as the 6th pulse. Further treatment was beneficial for four patients only. None of the studied parameters (serum creatinine level, renal biopsy, SLAM) was predictive of a response to an extended course of pulse cyclophosphamide. The infusions were definitively stopped in one patient and delayed in two others because of serious adverse effects. The data indicate that, in mean term, monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide was associated with a substantial amelioration of 24 hours urinary protein level. An amelioration of the renal function was however, uncommon.