Studying the history of histopathology in preclinical medical education as a guide for the uniform integration of radiology in medical education.

Radiology and pathology, though distinct fields within medical education, share a common foundation in their essential roles for accurate diagnosis and understanding of diseases. While pathology, particularly histopathology, has long been integrated into preclinical medical education in the United States, radiology education has traditionally been less emphasized. This paper examines the historical development of histopathology training in medical education and its central role, contrasting it with the comparatively peripheral position of radiology education. We explore the historical context of medical education in the United States, tracing the integration of histopathology following the Flexner Report of 1910. In contrast, radiology, emerging later as a specialized field, has faced challenges in achieving comparable integration into medical curricula. Despite the increasing importance of medical imaging in diagnosis and treatment, radiology education remains variable and often lacking in standardization across medical schools. We highlight the need for greater emphasis on radiology education to better prepare medical students for modern clinical practice, where medical imaging plays an increasingly pivotal role. A call for a comprehensive assessment of radiology education and advocacy for its integration into preclinical curricula is made, emphasizing the importance of collaboration between the radiology profession and accrediting bodies to ensure competence in imaging across medical specialties. As medical imaging continues to advance and become more integral to healthcare, it is imperative that medical education reflects this evolution by establishing radiology as a fundamental component of preclinical training.

Imaging in urethral stricture disease: an educational review of current techniques with a focus on MRI.

Urethral stricture disease refers to narrowing of the urethral lumen obstructing the flow of urine. Urethral strictures can significantly impact daily life due to incontinence, incomplete emptying, hesitancy, and increased risk of urinary tract infections. Imaging is central to the evaluation of suspected urethral stricture, as assessment of stricture length and severity is crucial for guidance of surgical management. The currently employed modalities include radiography, chiefly retrograde urethrography (RUG) and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG); magnetic resonance urethrography (MRU); and sonourethrography (SUG). MRU has become a recent focus of research as it provides high spatial resolution, multiplanar capacity, and soft tissue type differentiation for evaluation of periurethral compartments and concurrent soft tissue defects. The protocol for MRU has evolved over the years to now include dynamic micturition imaging and image reconstruction options. In this review, we discuss each of the imaging modalities used in the diagnosis and evaluation of urethral stricture and provide an overview of literature on MRU over the last decade, including suggested indications that have not yet been incorporated into current guidelines. We delineate scenarios where special diagnostic imaging beyond radiography is beneficial, providing examples from our practice and description of our techniques for each modality.